tailscale

Commit Graph

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Brad Fitzpatrick	64a24e796b	wgengine/tstun: fix 32-bit alignment again	4 years ago
Brad Fitzpatrick	abe095f036	wgengine/tstun: make Close safe for concurrent use	4 years ago
Brad Fitzpatrick	16a9cfe2f4	wgengine: configure wireguard peers lazily, as needed wireguard-go uses 3 goroutines per peer (with reasonably large stacks & buffers). Rather than tell wireguard-go about all our peers, only tell it about peers we're actively communicating with. That means we need hooks into magicsock's packet receiving path and tstun's packet sending path to lazily create a wireguard peer on demand from the network map. This frees up lots of memory for iOS (where we have almost nothing left for larger domains with many users). We should ideally do this in wireguard-go itself one day, but that'd be a pretty big change. Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>	4 years ago
Brad Fitzpatrick	a89d610a3d	wgengine/tstun: move sync.Pool to package global sync.Pools should almost always be packate globals, even though in this case we only have exactly 1 TUN device anyway, so it matters less. Still, it's unusual to see a Pool that's not a package global, so move it.	4 years ago
Brad Fitzpatrick	10ac066013	all: fix vet warnings	4 years ago
Dmytro Shynkevych	19867b2b6d	tstun: remove buggy-looking log line. This log line looks buggy, even though lacking a filter is expected during bringup. We already know if we forget to SetFilter: it breaks the magicsock test, so no useful information is lost. Resolves #559. Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shynkevych <dmytro@tailscale.com>	4 years ago
Brad Fitzpatrick	724ad13fe1	wgengine/tstun: fix alignment of 64-bit atomic field We had a test for it, but no 32-bit builder apparently. :( Fixes #529	4 years ago
Brad Fitzpatrick	23e74a0f7a	wgengine, magicsock, tstun: don't regularly STUN when idle (mobile only for now) If there's been 5 minutes of inactivity, stop doing STUN lookups. That means NAT mappings will expire, but they can resume later when there's activity again. We'll do this for all platforms later. Updates tailscale/corp#320 Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>	4 years ago
Dmytro Shynkevych	511840b1f6	tsdns: initial implementation of a Tailscale DNS resolver (#396 ) Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shynkevych <dmytro@tailscale.com>	4 years ago
Dmytro Shynkevych	02231e968e	wgengine/tstun: add tests and benchmarks (#436 ) Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shynkevych <dmytro@tailscale.com>	4 years ago
Dmytro Shynkevych	059b1d10bb	wgengine/packet: refactor and expose UDP header marshaling (#408 ) Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shynkevych <dmytro@tailscale.com>	4 years ago
Dmytro Shynkevych	737124ef70	tstun: tolerate zero reads Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shynkevych <dmytro@tailscale.com>	4 years ago
Dmytro Shynkevych	635f7b99f1	wgengine: pass tun.NativeDevice to router Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shynkevych <dmytro@tailscale.com>	5 years ago
Dmytro Shynkevych	33b2f30cea	wgengine: wrap tun.Device to support filtering and packet injection (#358 ) Right now, filtering and packet injection in wgengine depend on a patch to wireguard-go that probably isn't suitable for upstreaming. This need not be the case: wireguard-go/tun.Device is an interface. For example, faketun.go implements it to mock a TUN device for testing. This patch implements the same interface to provide filtering and packet injection at the tunnel device level, at which point the wireguard-go patch should no longer be necessary. This patch has the following performance impact on i7-7500U @ 2.70GHz, tested in the following namespace configuration: ┌────────────────┐ ┌─────────────────────────────────┐ ┌────────────────┐ │ $ns1 │ │ $ns0 │ │ $ns2 │ │ client0 │ │ tailcontrol, logcatcher │ │ client1 │ │ ┌─────┐ │ │ ┌──────┐ ┌──────┐ │ │ ┌─────┐ │ │ │vethc│───────┼────┼──│vethrc│ │vethrs│──────┼─────┼──│veths│ │ │ ├─────┴─────┐ │ │ ├──────┴────┐ ├──────┴────┐ │ │ ├─────┴─────┐ │ │ │10.0.0.2/24│ │ │ │10.0.0.1/24│ │10.0.1.1/24│ │ │ │10.0.1.2/24│ │ │ └───────────┘ │ │ └───────────┘ └───────────┘ │ │ └───────────┘ │ └────────────────┘ └─────────────────────────────────┘ └────────────────┘ Before: --------------------------------------------------- \| TCP send \| UDP send \| \|------------------------\|------------------------\| \| 557.0 (±8.5) Mbits/sec \| 3.03 (±0.02) Gbits/sec \| --------------------------------------------------- After: --------------------------------------------------- \| TCP send \| UDP send \| \|------------------------\|------------------------\| \| 544.8 (±1.6) Mbits/sec \| 3.13 (±0.02) Gbits/sec \| --------------------------------------------------- The impact on receive performance is similar. Signed-off-by: Dmytro Shynkevych <dmytro@tailscale.com>	5 years ago

14 Commits (5f807c389e4d332fc43a1fc6349f2db1e16092ca)