|
|
|
@ -409,27 +409,144 @@ Inputs:
|
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
|
- The key/values specified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Propagation
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
Propagation ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
The goals of propagation are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Profile updates should propagate to all rooms the user is in.
|
|
|
|
|
- Profile updates should propagate to all rooms the user is in so
|
|
|
|
|
rooms can display change events. Due to this, profile propagation
|
|
|
|
|
HAS to be in the event graph for the room, in order to place it in
|
|
|
|
|
the right position.
|
|
|
|
|
- We should support different kinds of profiles for different rooms.
|
|
|
|
|
- Propagation should avoid flicker between joining a room and getting
|
|
|
|
|
profile information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In v1, this was achieved by sending ``displayname`` and ``avatar_url``
|
|
|
|
|
keys inside the ``content`` of an ``m.room.member`` event. This event
|
|
|
|
|
type was chosen in order to prevent flicker on the client, as all the
|
|
|
|
|
information came down in one lump.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This had a number of problems associated with it:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- It conflated profile info and membership info, simply to avoid client
|
|
|
|
|
flicker.
|
|
|
|
|
- Name/avatar changes created more ``m.room.member`` events which meant
|
|
|
|
|
they needed to be included in the auth chains for federation. This
|
|
|
|
|
created long auth chains which is suboptimal since home servers need
|
|
|
|
|
to store the auth chains forever.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
These problems can be resolved by creating an ``m.room.member.profile``
|
|
|
|
|
event which contains profile information. This reduces the number of
|
|
|
|
|
``m.room.member`` events over federation, since profile changes are of
|
|
|
|
|
a different event type. This also prevents conflation of profile changes
|
|
|
|
|
and membership changes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However, this introduces its own set of problems, namely flicker. The
|
|
|
|
|
client would receive the ``m.room.member`` event first, followed by
|
|
|
|
|
the ``m.room.member.profile`` event, which could cause a flicker. In
|
|
|
|
|
addition, federation may not send both event types in a single transaction,
|
|
|
|
|
resulting in missing information on the receiving home server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For federation, these problems can be resolved by sending the
|
|
|
|
|
``m.room.member`` event as they are in v1 (with ``displayname`` and
|
|
|
|
|
``avatar_url`` in the ``content``). The receiving home server will then
|
|
|
|
|
extract these keys and create a server-generated ``m.room.member.profile``
|
|
|
|
|
event. To avoid confusion with duplicate information, the ``avatar_url``
|
|
|
|
|
and ``displayname`` keys should be removed by the receiving home server.
|
|
|
|
|
When a client requests these events (either from the event stream
|
|
|
|
|
or from an initial sync), the server will send the generated
|
|
|
|
|
``m.room.member.profile`` event under the ``unsigned.profile`` key of the
|
|
|
|
|
``m.room.member`` event. Subsequent profile updates are just sent as
|
|
|
|
|
``m.room.member.profile`` events.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For clients, profile information is now *entirely* represented in
|
|
|
|
|
``m.room.member.profile`` events. To avoid flicker, this event is
|
|
|
|
|
combined with the ``m.room.member`` event under an ``unsigned.profile``
|
|
|
|
|
key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In v1, users have a single profile. This information is duplicated for
|
|
|
|
|
every room the user is in. This duplication means that things like
|
|
|
|
|
display names *could* change on a room-by-room basis. However, this is
|
|
|
|
|
extremely inefficient when updating the display name, as you have to
|
|
|
|
|
send ``num_joined_rooms`` events to inform everyone of the update.
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case #1: @user:domain "User" joins a room
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's no easy solution to this. The room needs a record of the name
|
|
|
|
|
changes; it's not good enough to send it just to the users (the set of
|
|
|
|
|
all users in all rooms the user changing their display name is in), as
|
|
|
|
|
new users who join later still need to know about these changes. The
|
|
|
|
|
ordering information needs to be preserved as well.
|
|
|
|
|
HS --> HS:
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
content: {
|
|
|
|
|
displayname: "User",
|
|
|
|
|
membership: "join"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
type: "m.room.member",
|
|
|
|
|
[...]
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receiving HS transformation:
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
content: {
|
|
|
|
|
<remove displayname key>
|
|
|
|
|
membership: "join"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
type: "m.room.member",
|
|
|
|
|
[...]
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Receiving HS creates new server-generated event:
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
content: {
|
|
|
|
|
displayname: "User"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
type: "m.room.member.profile",
|
|
|
|
|
[...]
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client sees: (e.g. from event stream / initial sync)
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
content: {
|
|
|
|
|
membership: "join"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
type: "m.room.member",
|
|
|
|
|
unsigned: {
|
|
|
|
|
profile: {
|
|
|
|
|
content: {
|
|
|
|
|
displayname: "User"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
type: "m.room.member.profile",
|
|
|
|
|
[...]
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
[...]
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Case #2: @user:domain "User" updates their display name to "User2"
|
|
|
|
|
(they are already in the room)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
HS --> HS:
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
content: {
|
|
|
|
|
displayname: "User2"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
prev_content: {
|
|
|
|
|
displayname: "User"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
type: "m.room.member.profile",
|
|
|
|
|
[...]
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client sees:
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
content: {
|
|
|
|
|
displayname: "User2"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
prev_content: {
|
|
|
|
|
displayname: "User"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
type: "m.room.member.profile",
|
|
|
|
|
[...]
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An improvement would be to allow the client to not automatically share
|
|
|
|
|
updates of their profile information to all rooms.
|
|
|
|
|
The removal of the ``displayname`` and ``avatar_url`` keys from ``m.room.member``
|
|
|
|
|
can only be done if the client trusts their HS, as it will break the sending HS's
|
|
|
|
|
signature. Requesting the "raw" federation event will have to return these keys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Account Management API ``[ONGOING]``
|
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
|