|
|
|
|
@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ redactions" to ensure the room is cleaned up, though those senders can begin to
|
|
|
|
|
as best effort (currently, moderation bots in particular work incredibly hard to ensure they get *every*
|
|
|
|
|
event redacted, but can run into delivery, reliability, and completeness issues with 1:1 redactions).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It's also important to note that this proposal intends to compliment mass redactions and coexist in
|
|
|
|
|
It's also important to note that this proposal intends to complement mass redactions and coexist in
|
|
|
|
|
whatever room version mass redactions land in. This proposal has narrow scope and is fairly blunt as
|
|
|
|
|
a measure, which may not be desirable in all situations. For example, only a user's last dozen or so
|
|
|
|
|
messages may be worth redacting rather than the hundreds they sent prior to the ones which got them
|
|
|
|
|
|