From 3910458d06ce968dfbdae3d171b75140a6cff20e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Andrew Morgan <1342360+anoadragon453@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 12 Nov 2025 17:19:48 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] typo Co-authored-by: Hubert Chathi --- proposals/4293-redact-on-ban.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/proposals/4293-redact-on-ban.md b/proposals/4293-redact-on-ban.md index 1fda88568..4190b7b1f 100644 --- a/proposals/4293-redact-on-ban.md +++ b/proposals/4293-redact-on-ban.md @@ -57,7 +57,7 @@ redactions" to ensure the room is cleaned up, though those senders can begin to as best effort (currently, moderation bots in particular work incredibly hard to ensure they get *every* event redacted, but can run into delivery, reliability, and completeness issues with 1:1 redactions). -It's also important to note that this proposal intends to compliment mass redactions and coexist in +It's also important to note that this proposal intends to complement mass redactions and coexist in whatever room version mass redactions land in. This proposal has narrow scope and is fairly blunt as a measure, which may not be desirable in all situations. For example, only a user's last dozen or so messages may be worth redacting rather than the hundreds they sent prior to the ones which got them