|
|
@ -321,6 +321,10 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
prefs := *nn[0].Prefs
|
|
|
|
prefs := *nn[0].Prefs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Note: a totally fresh system has Prefs.LoggedOut=false by
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// default. We are logged out, but not because the user asked
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// for it, so it doesn't count as Prefs.LoggedOut==true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[0].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, *nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, *nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
@ -343,6 +347,7 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[0].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, *nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, *nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
@ -383,6 +388,7 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// Trying to log in automatically sets WantRunning.
|
|
|
|
// Trying to log in automatically sets WantRunning.
|
|
|
|
// BUG: that should have happened right after Login().
|
|
|
|
// BUG: that should have happened right after Login().
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[0].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -555,16 +561,18 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// User wants to logout.
|
|
|
|
// User wants to logout.
|
|
|
|
t.Logf("\n\nLogout (async)")
|
|
|
|
t.Logf("\n\nLogout (async)")
|
|
|
|
notifies.expect(1)
|
|
|
|
notifies.expect(2)
|
|
|
|
b.Logout()
|
|
|
|
b.Logout()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(1)
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(2)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"StartLogout"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
// BUG: now is not the time to unpause.
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"unpause", "StartLogout"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: WantRunning is false here, which is right. But
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].State)
|
|
|
|
// it changes to true in subsequent logout attempts, which is
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
// wrong in those attempts.
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, *nn[0].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[1].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[1].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Let's make the logout succeed.
|
|
|
|
// Let's make the logout succeed.
|
|
|
@ -574,21 +582,27 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
cc.send(nil, "", false, nil)
|
|
|
|
cc.send(nil, "", false, nil)
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(1)
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(1)
|
|
|
|
// BUG: now is not the time to unpause.
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"unpause"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, *nn[0].State)
|
|
|
|
// BUG: WantRunning should be false after manual logout.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// A second logout should do nothing, since the prefs haven't changed.
|
|
|
|
// A second logout should do nothing, since the prefs haven't changed.
|
|
|
|
t.Logf("\n\nLogout2 (async)")
|
|
|
|
t.Logf("\n\nLogout2 (async)")
|
|
|
|
notifies.expect(0)
|
|
|
|
notifies.expect(1)
|
|
|
|
b.Logout()
|
|
|
|
b.Logout()
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
notifies.drain(0)
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(1)
|
|
|
|
// BUG: the backend has already called StartLogout, and we're
|
|
|
|
// BUG: the backend has already called StartLogout, and we're
|
|
|
|
// still logged out. So it shouldn't call it again.
|
|
|
|
// still logged out. So it shouldn't call it again.
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"StartLogout"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"StartLogout"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// BUG: Prefs should not change here. Already logged out.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -601,6 +615,7 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(1)
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(1)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
// BUG: second logout shouldn't cause WantRunning->true !!
|
|
|
|
// BUG: second logout shouldn't cause WantRunning->true !!
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
@ -616,6 +631,7 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(1)
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(1)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"Logout"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"Logout"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
@ -629,6 +645,7 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(1)
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(1)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
// BUG: third logout shouldn't cause WantRunning->true !!
|
|
|
|
// BUG: third logout shouldn't cause WantRunning->true !!
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
@ -664,16 +681,14 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// BUG: We already called Shutdown(), no need to do it again.
|
|
|
|
// BUG: We already called Shutdown(), no need to do it again.
|
|
|
|
// BUG: Way too soon for UpdateEndpoints.
|
|
|
|
// BUG: Way too soon for UpdateEndpoints.
|
|
|
|
// BUG: We've forgotten that we logged out earlier.
|
|
|
|
// BUG: don't unpause because we're not logged in.
|
|
|
|
// Shouldn't cc.Login() until the user engages, or else we
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"Shutdown", "New", "UpdateEndpoints", "unpause"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
// defeat the "no traffic until `tailscale up`" logic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// BUG: strictly, it should pause, not unpause, here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"Shutdown", "New", "UpdateEndpoints", "Login", "unpause"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(2)
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(2)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, *nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, *nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
@ -684,17 +699,19 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// (This simulates an admin reviving a key that you previously
|
|
|
|
// (This simulates an admin reviving a key that you previously
|
|
|
|
// disabled.)
|
|
|
|
// disabled.)
|
|
|
|
t.Logf("\n\nLoginFinished3")
|
|
|
|
t.Logf("\n\nLoginFinished3")
|
|
|
|
notifies.expect(2)
|
|
|
|
notifies.expect(3)
|
|
|
|
cc.setAuthBlocked(false)
|
|
|
|
cc.setAuthBlocked(false)
|
|
|
|
cc.send(nil, "", true, &netmap.NetworkMap{
|
|
|
|
cc.send(nil, "", true, &netmap.NetworkMap{
|
|
|
|
MachineStatus: tailcfg.MachineAuthorized,
|
|
|
|
MachineStatus: tailcfg.MachineAuthorized,
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(2)
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(3)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"unpause"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"unpause"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].LoginFinished)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].LoginFinished)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.Starting, *nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[2].State)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[0].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.Starting, *nn[2].State)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Now we've logged in successfully. Let's disconnect.
|
|
|
|
// Now we've logged in successfully. Let's disconnect.
|
|
|
@ -711,6 +728,7 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.Stopped, *nn[0].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.Stopped, *nn[0].State)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[1].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// One more restart, this time with a valid key, but WantRunning=false.
|
|
|
|
// One more restart, this time with a valid key, but WantRunning=false.
|
|
|
@ -722,20 +740,16 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: cc.Shutdown() is correct here, since we didn't call
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: cc.Shutdown() is correct here, since we didn't call
|
|
|
|
// b.Shutdown() explicitly ourselves.
|
|
|
|
// b.Shutdown() explicitly ourselves.
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"Shutdown", "New", "UpdateEndpoints", "unpause"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
// BUG: UpdateEndpoints should be called here since we're not WantRunning.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"Shutdown", "New", "UpdateEndpoints", "pause"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(2)
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(2)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
prefs := *nn[0].Prefs
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[0].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
// BUG: NeedsLogin is incorrect. We are already logged in.
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.Stopped, *nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
// This is the cause of bug tailscale/corp#1660.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// (Whenever we enter the NeedsLogin state, the UI will
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// sent the user a notification that they should log in.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, *nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This time, let's have the control server spontaneously
|
|
|
|
// This time, let's have the control server spontaneously
|
|
|
@ -744,25 +758,35 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
// it. (Normally we should call b.Login() first, but we already
|
|
|
|
// it. (Normally we should call b.Login() first, but we already
|
|
|
|
// tested that up above.)
|
|
|
|
// tested that up above.)
|
|
|
|
t.Logf("\n\nLoginFinished4")
|
|
|
|
t.Logf("\n\nLoginFinished4")
|
|
|
|
notifies.expect(3)
|
|
|
|
notifies.expect(1)
|
|
|
|
cc.setAuthBlocked(false)
|
|
|
|
cc.setAuthBlocked(false)
|
|
|
|
cc.send(nil, "", true, &netmap.NetworkMap{
|
|
|
|
cc.send(nil, "", true, &netmap.NetworkMap{
|
|
|
|
MachineStatus: tailcfg.MachineAuthorized,
|
|
|
|
MachineStatus: tailcfg.MachineAuthorized,
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(3)
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(1)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"unpause"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: No call to Login() here since !WantRunning at
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// startup time.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].LoginFinished)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].LoginFinished)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// State is still ipn.Stopped, as expected.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Request connection.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The state machine didn't call Login() earlier, so now it needs to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
t.Logf("\n\nWantRunning4 -> true")
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
notifies.expect(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
b.EditPrefs(&ipn.MaskedPrefs{
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
WantRunningSet: true,
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Prefs: ipn.Prefs{WantRunning: true},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(2)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"unpause", "Login"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// BUG: I would expect Prefs to change first, and state after.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[2].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.Starting, *nn[0].State)
|
|
|
|
// BUG: WantRunning spontaneously shifted to true.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This should happen if a user calls b.Login(), but not if
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// a login spontaneously finishes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// This could lead to a bug where the control server could
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// remotely cause a node to re-connect when it's supposed to
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// be in the Stopped state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[1].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.Starting, *nn[2].State)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The last test case is the most common one: restarting when both
|
|
|
|
// The last test case is the most common one: restarting when both
|
|
|
@ -775,40 +799,32 @@ func TestStateMachine(t *testing.T) {
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: cc.Shutdown() is correct here, since we didn't call
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: cc.Shutdown() is correct here, since we didn't call
|
|
|
|
// b.Shutdown() ourselves.
|
|
|
|
// b.Shutdown() ourselves.
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"Shutdown", "New", "UpdateEndpoints", "Login", "unpause"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"Shutdown", "New", "UpdateEndpoints", "Login"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(2)
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(2)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].Prefs)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
prefs := *nn[0].Prefs
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(false, nn[0].Prefs.LoggedOut)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(true, nn[0].Prefs.WantRunning)
|
|
|
|
// BUG: NeedsLogin is very wrong, it could trigger a login
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.Starting, *nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
// notification. (It goes away quickly once the control
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.Starting, b.State())
|
|
|
|
// server gets back to us, but this race condition is
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// enough to probably cause spurious notifications. I think
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// I've seen this on Windows.)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
//
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Probably we should go to Starting right away here, since
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// WantRunning==true and we believe (so far) that our key
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// is valid.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, *nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.NeedsLogin, b.State())
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// Control server accepts our valid key from before.
|
|
|
|
// Control server accepts our valid key from before.
|
|
|
|
t.Logf("\n\nLoginFinished5")
|
|
|
|
t.Logf("\n\nLoginFinished5")
|
|
|
|
notifies.expect(2)
|
|
|
|
notifies.expect(1)
|
|
|
|
cc.setAuthBlocked(false)
|
|
|
|
cc.setAuthBlocked(false)
|
|
|
|
cc.send(nil, "", true, &netmap.NetworkMap{
|
|
|
|
cc.send(nil, "", true, &netmap.NetworkMap{
|
|
|
|
MachineStatus: tailcfg.MachineAuthorized,
|
|
|
|
MachineStatus: tailcfg.MachineAuthorized,
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
})
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(2)
|
|
|
|
nn := notifies.drain(1)
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{"unpause"}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal([]string{}, cc.getCalls())
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].LoginFinished)
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[0].LoginFinished)
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: No prefs change this time. WantRunning stays true.
|
|
|
|
// NOTE: No prefs change this time. WantRunning stays true.
|
|
|
|
assert.NotNil(nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
// We were in Starting in the first place, so that doesn't
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.Starting, *nn[1].State)
|
|
|
|
// change either.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
assert.Equal(ipn.Starting, b.State())
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|