matrix-spec/content/client-server-api/modules/receipts.md

Receipts

{{< changed-in v="1.4" >}} Added private read receipts.

This module adds in support for receipts. These receipts are a form of acknowledgement of an event. This module defines the m.read receipt for indicating that the user has read up to a given event, and m.read.private to achieve the same purpose without any other user being aware. Primarily, m.read.private is intended to clear notifications without advertising read-up-to status to others.

Sending a receipt for each event can result in sending large amounts of traffic to a homeserver. To prevent this from becoming a problem, receipts are implemented using "up to" markers. This marker indicates that the acknowledgement applies to all events "up to and including" the event specified. For example, marking an event as "read" would indicate that the user had read all events up to the referenced event. See the Receiving notifications section for more information on how read receipts affect notification counts.

{{< added-in v="1.4" >}} Read receipts exist in three major forms:

• Unthreaded: Denotes a read-up-to receipt regardless of threads. This is how pre-threading read receipts worked.
• Threaded, main timeline: Denotes a read-up-to receipt for events not in a particular thread. Identified by the thread ID main.
• Threaded, in a thread: Denotes a read-up-to receipt within a particular thread. Identified by the event ID of the thread root.

Threaded read receipts are discussed in further detail below.

Events

{{< changed-in v="1.4" >}} Each user_id, receipt_type, and categorisation (unthreaded, or thread_id) tuple must be associated with only a single event_id.

{{% event event="m.receipt" %}}

Client behaviour

{{< changed-in v="1.4" >}} Altered to support threaded read receipts.

In /sync, receipts are listed under the ephemeral array of events for a given room. New receipts that come down the event streams are deltas which update existing mappings. Clients should replace older receipt acknowledgements based on user_id, receipt_type, and the thread_id (if present). For example:

Client receives m.receipt:
  user = @alice:example.com
  receipt_type = m.read
  event_id = $aaa:example.com
  thread_id = undefined

Client receives another m.receipt:
  user = @alice:example.com
  receipt_type = m.read
  event_id = $bbb:example.com
  thread_id = main

The client does not replace any acknowledgements, yet.

Client receives yet another m.receipt:
  user = @alice:example.com
  receipt_type = m.read
  event_id = $ccc:example.com
  thread_id = undefined

The client replaces the older acknowledgement for $aaa:example.com
with this new one for $ccc:example.com, but does not replace the
acknowledgement for $bbb:example.com because it belongs to a thread.

Client receives yet another m.receipt:
  user = @alice:example.com
  receipt_type = m.read
  event_id = $ddd:example.com
  thread_id = main

Now the client replaces the older $bbb:example.com acknowledgement with
this new $ddd:example.com acknowledgement. The client does NOT replace the
older acknowledgement for $ccc:example.com as it is unthreaded.

Clients should send read receipts when there is some certainty that the event in question has been displayed to the user. Simply receiving an event does not provide enough certainty that the user has seen the event. The user SHOULD need to take some action such as viewing the room that the event was sent to or dismissing a notification in order for the event to count as "read". Clients SHOULD NOT send read receipts for events sent by their own user.

Similar to the rules for sending receipts, threaded receipts should appear in the context of the thread. If a thread is rendered behind a disclosure, the client hasn't yet shown the event (or any applicable read receipts) to the user. Once they expand the thread though, a threaded read receipt would be sent and per-thread receipts from other users shown.

A client can update the markers for its user by interacting with the following HTTP APIs.

{{% http-api spec="client-server" api="receipts" %}}

Private read receipts

{{% added-in v="1.4" %}}

Some users would like to mark a room as read, clearing their notification counts, but not give away the fact that they've read a particular message yet. To achieve this, clients can send m.read.private receipts instead of m.read to do exactly that: clear notifications and not broadcast the receipt to other users.

Servers MUST NOT send the m.read.private receipt to any other user than the one which originally sent it.

Between m.read and m.read.private, the receipt which is more "ahead" or "recent" is used when determining the highest read-up-to mark. See the notifications section for more information on how this affects notification counts.

If a client sends an m.read receipt which is "behind" the m.read.private receipt, other users will see that change happen but the sending user will not have their notification counts rewound to that point in time. While uncommon, it is considered valid to have an m.read (public) receipt lag several messages behind the m.read.private receipt, for example.

Threaded read receipts

{{% added-in v="1.4" %}}

If a client does not use threading, then they will simply only send "unthreaded" read receipts which affect the whole room regardless of threads.

A threaded read receipt is simply one which has a thread_id on it, targeting either a thread root's event ID or main for the main timeline.

Threading introduces a concept of multiple conversations being held in the same room and thus deserve their own read receipts and notification counts. An event is considered to be "in a thread" if it meets any of the following criteria:

• It has a rel_type of m.thread.
• It has child events with a rel_type of m.thread (in which case it'd be the thread root).
• Following the event relationships, it has a parent event which qualifies for one of the above. Implementations should not recurse infinitely, though: a maximum of 3 hops is recommended to cover indirect relationships.

Events not in a thread but still in the room are considered to be part of the "main timeline", or a special thread with an ID of main.

The following is an example DAG for a room, with dotted lines showing event relationships and solid lines showing topological ordering.

This DAG can be represented as 3 threaded timelines, with A and B being thread roots:

With this, we can demonstrate that:

• A threaded read receipt on I would mark A, B, and I as read.
• A threaded read receipt on E would mark C and E as read.
• An unthreaded read receipt on D would mark A, B, C, and D as read.

Note that marking A as read with a threaded read receipt would not mean that C, E, G, or H get marked as read: Thread A's timeline would need its own threaded read receipt at H to accomplish that.

The read receipts for the above 3 examples would be:

{
  "$I": {
    "m.read": {
      "@user:example.org": {
        "ts": 1661384801651,
        "thread_id": "main" // because `I` is not in a thread, but is a threaded receipt
      }
    }
  },
  "$E": {
    "m.read": {
      "@user:example.org": {
        "ts": 1661384801651,
        "thread_id": "$A" // because `E` is in Thread `A`
      }
    }
  },
  "$D": {
    "m.read": {
      "@user:example.org": {
        "ts": 1661384801651
        // no `thread_id` because the receipt is *unthreaded*
      }
    }
  }
}

Conditions on sending read receipts apply similarly to threaded and unthreaded read receipts. For example, a client might send a private read receipt for a threaded event when the user expands that thread.

Server behaviour

For efficiency, receipts SHOULD be batched into one event per room before delivering them to clients.

Some receipts are sent across federation as EDUs with type m.receipt. The format of the EDUs are:

{
    <room_id>: {
        <receipt_type>: {
            <user_id>: { <content (ts & thread_id, currently)> }
        },
        ...
    },
    ...
}

These are always sent as deltas to previously sent receipts. Currently only a single <receipt_type> should be used: m.read. m.read.private MUST NOT appear in this federated m.receipt EDU.

Security considerations

As receipts are sent outside the context of the event graph, there are no integrity checks performed on the contents of m.receipt events.