You cannot select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
26 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
26 lines
1.3 KiB
Markdown
# Proposal to do SRV lookups after .well-known to discover homeservers
|
|
|
|
Currently there is a logistical error proposed by [MSC1708](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/1708)
|
|
which results in some homeservers unable to migrate to the new functionality
|
|
proposed by [MSC1711](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/1711). This
|
|
can happen if the delegated homeserver cannot obtain a valid TLS certificate for
|
|
the domain, and an SRV record is used for backwards compatibility reasons.
|
|
|
|
Specifically, in order to be compatible with requests from both Synapse 0.34 and 1.0,
|
|
servers can have both a SRV and a .well-known file, with Synapse presenting a certificate
|
|
corresponding to the target of the .well-known. Synapse 0.34 is then happy because it
|
|
will follow the SRV (and won't care about the incorrect certificate); Synapse 1.0 is
|
|
happy because it will follow the .well-known (and will see the correct cert).
|
|
|
|
## Proposal
|
|
|
|
We change the order of operations to perform a .well-known lookup before falling
|
|
back to resolving the SRV record. This allows for domains to delegate to other
|
|
hostnames and maintains backwards compatibility with older homeservers.
|
|
|
|
## Tradeoffs
|
|
|
|
More HTTP hits will be made due to the .well-known lookup being first. This is
|
|
somewhat mitigated by servers caching the responses appropriately, and using
|
|
connection pools where possible.
|