Previously, titles would appear that do not link to a subchema definition.
It would also mean that named subschemas would appear without being clearly referenced.
Now, the type clearly shows the nesting of objects
and subschema definitions should be clearly referenced.
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Upgrade version of Hugo used to build the spec in CI
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Escape HTML manually in property-type partial
The behavior of `delimit` changed,
so Hugo doesn't recognize "safe" HTML passed to it anymore, so it escapes nested HTML links.
To fix that we escape the schema data manually
and consider the output of the partial as "safe".
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Add changelog
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
Makes it easier to use, like resolve-refs. It just needs to be called once.
Fixes an issue with m.call.* events not displaying the common fields
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
Since we already have three of these, and I'm about to add a fourth, let's pull
it out to a common definition.
We could, of course, keep defining the grammar each time it's used, but
defining it in an appendix helps us be consistent for future API design.
The split was not clear between property-type and type-or-title,
so it was not obvious which partial should be called for recursion.
That resulted in an error where type-or-title was only called for objects and array items, even if it also resolves
arrays of types.
This makes the split clearer. property-type must be called for any schema,
and object-type-or-title is only called for object schemas.
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Use the resolve-refs partial as soon as possible
Call it right after accessing the site.Data,
since it is recursing it will solve all references in the tree.
That way we don't need to wonder where to call it,
we trust the validators that the refs will be used in the right place.
* Enable strict $ref rule in OpenAPI validator
* Document use of $ref to compose examples
* Fix schema path in event-fields shortcode
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Fix `v` tag_name prefix sneaking into npm version
* Fix `yarn version` failing in CI due to no git global ident name
* Add changelog
* Rename 1765.misc to 1765.clarification
* Break out non-JSON request/response content types as tables
Currently we display this as a table like "image/png|image/jpeg" and description on a single line, but we're using a table. This breaks the join out to individual rows.
* changelog
It was not enabled before the docsy update and it messes with
the TOC highlighting during the transition.
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Deprecate the `font` HTML tag
Rationale:
MSC4077 allows to deprecate HTML tags
that are deprecated in the WHATWG standard,
if they can be replaced by tags with the same feature.
`font` is deprecated and can be replaced by `span`
with the `data-mx-bg-color` and `data-mx-color` attributes.
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Add changelog
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Add deprecation info box
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Spec for MSC3981
This writes up https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3981
Hopefully this is relatively straightforward, apart from having to add
the parameters and response field in all three places. I tried to factor
these out but it seems references just aren't supported in the right
places currently (see https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec/pull/1745
for my efforts). Path parameters can't be optional, so it can't be done
that way either.
* Missed schemas
* newsfile
* Actually it clearly isn't going to support markdown, is it?
* grammar
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* grammar
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Clarity
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Clarity
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Typo
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* More clarity.
Note this is counter what the MSC actually proposed to add, but
I think it's clear that this is what it meant.
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* clarification around implementation requirement, and mention new label
* add changelog
* fix typo
* Fix typos
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Add missing 'in' in SSO specification
Signed-off-by: Johannes Marbach <n0-0ne+github@mailbox.org>
* Use standard changelog entry for typos
---------
Signed-off-by: Johannes Marbach <n0-0ne+github@mailbox.org>
Co-authored-by: Hubert Chathi <hubert@uhoreg.ca>
* Convert m.call.candidates schema to YAML
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Clarify that sdpMid and sdpMLineIndex are not required in `m.call.candidates`
MSC2746, merged in v1.17,
introduced the end-of-candidates candidate,
where only the `candidate` property is set to an empty string.
Besides, the [WebRTC specification](https://www.w3.org/TR/webrtc/)
says that only one of those fields is required in a normal candidate.
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Add changelog
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Link to the "End-of-candidates" section, and clarify what "empty" means
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Disambiguate uses of PublicRoomsChunk
Make sure that different objects don't share the same title.
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Clarify that extra fields of space hierarchy children are not required
There is no `children_state` field,
the `room_type` is only set for spaces
and the description of `allowed_room_ids` says that the field can be omitted.
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
Kévin Commaille