|
|
@ -422,7 +422,7 @@ further discussion should happen in GitHub comments.
|
|
|
|
Not in this MSC but that can be considered in the future.
|
|
|
|
Not in this MSC but that can be considered in the future.
|
|
|
|
1. _Why not Reddit-style single-letter type specifiers? That's almost
|
|
|
|
1. _Why not Reddit-style single-letter type specifiers? That's almost
|
|
|
|
as compact as a sigil, still pretty clearly conveys the type,
|
|
|
|
as compact as a sigil, still pretty clearly conveys the type,
|
|
|
|
and nicely avoids the confusion described in the previous question._
|
|
|
|
and nicely avoids the singular vs. plural confusion._
|
|
|
|
Reddit-style prefixes would eventually produce bigger ambiguity as
|
|
|
|
Reddit-style prefixes would eventually produce bigger ambiguity as
|
|
|
|
primary notation; but they can be handy as shortcuts. As discussed
|
|
|
|
primary notation; but they can be handy as shortcuts. As discussed
|
|
|
|
further below, the current proposal provides enough space to define
|
|
|
|
further below, the current proposal provides enough space to define
|
|
|
|