Add draft core_model.rst
parent
8b4a35e341
commit
a2d9e8ca22
@ -0,0 +1,112 @@
|
|||||||
|
Models
|
||||||
|
======
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Client
|
||||||
|
------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Server
|
||||||
|
------
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Events
|
||||||
|
------
|
||||||
|
An event is a collection of data (the `payload`) and metadata associated with
|
||||||
|
it to be distributed across servers and is the primary data unit in Matrix.
|
||||||
|
Events are extensible so that clients and servers can add extra fields to the
|
||||||
|
payload or metadata that are not in this specification.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Events are distributed to interested servers upon creation. Historical events
|
||||||
|
may be requested from servers, though servers are not required to produce all
|
||||||
|
or any events requested.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
All events have a metadata `type` field that is used by client and servers to
|
||||||
|
determine how the payload should be processed and used. There are a number of
|
||||||
|
types reserved by the protocol for particular uses, but otherwise types may be
|
||||||
|
defined by applications, clients or servers for their own purposes.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Graph
|
||||||
|
~~~~~
|
||||||
|
Each event has a list of zero or more `parent` events. These relations form
|
||||||
|
directed acyclic graphs of events, called `event graphs`. Every event graph has
|
||||||
|
a single root event.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Event graphs give a partial ordering of events, i.e. given two events one may
|
||||||
|
be considered to have come before the other if one is an ancestor of the other.
|
||||||
|
Since two events may be on separate branches, not all events can be compared in
|
||||||
|
this manner.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Every event has a metadata `depth` field that is a positive integer that is
|
||||||
|
strictly greater than the depths of any of its parents. The root event should
|
||||||
|
have a depth of 1.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
[Note: if one event is before another, then it must have a strictly smaller
|
||||||
|
depth]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Integrity
|
||||||
|
~~~~~~~~~
|
||||||
|
Portions of events will be signed by one or more servers or clients. The parent
|
||||||
|
relations, type, depth and payload (as well as other metadata fields that will
|
||||||
|
be specified) must be signed by the originating server. [Note: Thus, once an
|
||||||
|
event is distributed and referenced by later events, they effectively become
|
||||||
|
immutable].
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The payload may also be encrypted by clients, except in the case where the
|
||||||
|
payload need to be interpreted by the servers. A list of event types that
|
||||||
|
cannot have an encrypted payload are given later.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
State
|
||||||
|
-----
|
||||||
|
Event graphs may have meta information associated with them, called `state`.
|
||||||
|
State can be updated over time by servers or clients, subject to
|
||||||
|
authentication.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The state of a graph is split into `sections` that can be atomically updated
|
||||||
|
independently of each other.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
State is stored within the graph itself, and can be computed by looking at the
|
||||||
|
graph in its entirety. Thus we can define the state at a given event to be the
|
||||||
|
state of the sub graph of all events "before" and including that event.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Some sections of the state may determine behaviour of the protocol, including
|
||||||
|
authorization and distribution. These sections must not be encrypted.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
State Events
|
||||||
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||||
|
`State events` are events that update a section of the state of a graph. These
|
||||||
|
state events hold all the same properties of events, and are part of the event
|
||||||
|
graph. The payload of the event is the replacement value for the particular
|
||||||
|
section of state being updated.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
State events must also include a `state_key` metadata field, which in
|
||||||
|
conjunction with the type field defines the section of state that is to be
|
||||||
|
updated.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
State Resolution
|
||||||
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||||
|
A given state section may have multiple state events associated with it in a
|
||||||
|
given graph. A consistent method of selecting which state event takes
|
||||||
|
precedence is therefore required.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
This is done by taking the latest state events, i.e. the set of events that
|
||||||
|
either incomparable or after every other event. A state resolution algorithm is
|
||||||
|
then applied to this set to select one.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The state resolution algorithm must be transitive and not depend on server
|
||||||
|
state, as it must consistently select the same event irrespective of the server
|
||||||
|
or the order the events were received in.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
State Dictionary
|
||||||
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||||
|
The state dictionary is the mapping from sections of state to the state events
|
||||||
|
which set the section to its current value. The state dictionary, like the
|
||||||
|
state itself, depends on the events currently in the graph and so is updated
|
||||||
|
with each new event received.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Since the sections of the state are defined by a pair of strings that came from
|
||||||
|
the type and state_key of the events that update them, the state dictionary can
|
||||||
|
be defined as a mapping from the pair (type, state_key) to a state event with
|
||||||
|
those values in the graph.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Deleting State
|
||||||
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||||||
|
TODO
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue