|
|
@ -252,8 +252,14 @@ inform the other with suitable proof.
|
|
|
|
The proofs can be:
|
|
|
|
The proofs can be:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- An *event chain* that shows an auth event is *not* an ancestor of the event.
|
|
|
|
- An *event chain* that shows an auth event is *not* an ancestor of the event.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This can be done by giving the full ancestor chains up to the depth of the
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
invalid auth event.
|
|
|
|
- Given an event (and event chain?) showing that authorization had been revoked.
|
|
|
|
- Given an event (and event chain?) showing that authorization had been revoked.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If a server discovers it cannot prove the other side is wrong, then it accepts
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
that the other is correct; i.e. we always accept that the other side is correct
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
unless we can prove otherwise.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
State Resolution
|
|
|
|
State Resolution
|
|
|
|