|
|
|
|
@ -364,7 +364,7 @@ property under `m.new_content`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A particular constraint applies to events which replace a [reply](#rich-replies):
|
|
|
|
|
in contrast to the original reply, there should be no `m.in_reply_to` property
|
|
|
|
|
in the the `m.relates_to` object, since it would be redundant (see
|
|
|
|
|
in the `m.relates_to` object, since it would be redundant (see
|
|
|
|
|
[Applying `m.new_content`](#applying-mnew_content) above, which notes that the
|
|
|
|
|
original event's `m.relates_to` is preserved), as well as being contrary to the
|
|
|
|
|
spirit of the event relationships mechanism which expects only one "parent" per
|
|
|
|
|
|