|
|
@ -120,12 +120,9 @@ allow peeking; you have to be joined to see the members, and users who don't
|
|
|
|
want to be seen by the public to be member of the group are added to the
|
|
|
|
want to be seen by the public to be member of the group are added to the
|
|
|
|
subgroup.
|
|
|
|
subgroup.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
XXX: is there a use case today for having a group where users are unaware of the
|
|
|
|
In future, there may be a usecase for groups where members are unaware of the
|
|
|
|
other users' membership? e.g. if I am a member of `+scandalous:matrix.org`
|
|
|
|
other users' membership. This would also be useful for other rooms, and is left
|
|
|
|
should i have a way to stop other members knowing that I am? One solution here
|
|
|
|
for a future proposal.
|
|
|
|
could be "auditorium mode", where users cannot see other users' identities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
(unless they speak). This could be added later, however, and would also be
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
useful for normal rooms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Flair
|
|
|
|
## Flair
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|