|
|
|
Instant Messaging
|
|
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _module:im:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This module adds support for sending human-readable messages to a room. It also
|
|
|
|
adds support for associating human-readable information with the room itself
|
|
|
|
such as a room name and topic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Events
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{m_room_message_event}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. admonition:: Rationale
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not all clients can display all message types. The most commonly supported
|
|
|
|
message type is raw text. As a result, we chose to have a textual fallback
|
|
|
|
display method represented by the ``body`` key. This means that even if the
|
|
|
|
client cannot display a particular ``msgtype``, they can still display
|
|
|
|
*something*, even if it is just plain text.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{m_room_message_feedback_event}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usage of this event is discouraged for several reasons:
|
|
|
|
- The number of feedback events will grow very quickly with the number of users
|
|
|
|
in the room. This event provides no way to "batch" feedback, unlike the
|
|
|
|
`receipts module`_.
|
|
|
|
- Pairing feedback to messages gets complicated when paginating as feedback
|
|
|
|
arrives before the message it is acknowledging.
|
|
|
|
- There are no guarantees that the client has seen the event ID being
|
|
|
|
acknowledged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _`receipts module`: `module:receipts`_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{m_room_name_event}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{m_room_topic_event}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m.room.message msgtypes
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each `m.room.message`_ MUST have a ``msgtype`` key which identifies the type
|
|
|
|
of message being sent. Each type has their own required and optional keys, as
|
|
|
|
outlined below. If a client cannot display the given ``msgtype`` then it MUST
|
|
|
|
display the fallback plain text ``body`` key instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{msgtype_events}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client behaviour
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients SHOULD verify the structure of incoming events to ensure that the
|
|
|
|
expected keys exist and that they are of the right type. Clients can discard
|
|
|
|
malformed events or display a placeholder message to the user. Redacted
|
|
|
|
``m.room.message`` events MUST be removed from the client. This can either be
|
|
|
|
replaced with placeholder text (e.g. "[REDACTED]") or the redacted message can
|
|
|
|
be removed entirely from the messages view.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Events which have attachments (e.g. ``m.image``, ``m.file``) SHOULD be
|
|
|
|
uploaded using the `content repository module`_ where available. The
|
|
|
|
resulting ``mxc://`` URI can then be used in the ``url`` key. The
|
|
|
|
attachment SHOULD be uploaded *prior* to sending the event in order to stop a
|
|
|
|
race condition where the recipient receives a link to a non-existent attachment.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _`content repository module`: `module:content`_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendations when sending messages
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients can send messages using ``POST`` or ``PUT`` requests. Clients SHOULD use
|
|
|
|
``PUT`` requests with `transaction IDs`_ to make requests idempotent. This
|
|
|
|
ensures that messages are sent exactly once even under poor network conditions.
|
|
|
|
Clients SHOULD retry requests using an exponential-backoff algorithm for a
|
|
|
|
certain amount of time T. It is recommended that T is no longer than 5 minutes.
|
|
|
|
After this time, the client should stop retrying and mark the message as "unsent".
|
|
|
|
Users should be able to manually resend unsent messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Users may type several messages at once and send them all in quick succession.
|
|
|
|
Clients SHOULD preserve the order in which they were sent by the user. This
|
|
|
|
means that clients should wait for the response to the previous request before
|
|
|
|
sending the next request. This can lead to head-of-line blocking. In order to
|
|
|
|
reduce the impact of head-of-line blocking, clients should use a queue per room
|
|
|
|
rather than a global queue, as ordering is only relevant within a single room
|
|
|
|
rather than between rooms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _`transaction IDs`: `sect:txn_ids`_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local echo
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messages SHOULD appear immediately in the message view when a user presses the
|
|
|
|
"send" button. This should occur even if the message is still sending. This is
|
|
|
|
referred to as "local echo". Clients SHOULD implement "local echo" of messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients need to be able to pair up the "remote echo" from the server with the
|
|
|
|
"local echo" to prevent duplicate messages being displayed. Ideally this pairing
|
|
|
|
would occur transparently to the user: the UI would not flicker as it transitions
|
|
|
|
from local to remote. Flickering cannot be fully avoided in version 1 of the
|
|
|
|
client-server API. Two scenarios need to be considered:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The client sends a message and the remote echo arrives on the event stream
|
|
|
|
*after* the request to send the message completes.
|
|
|
|
- The client sends a message and the remote echo arrives on the event stream
|
|
|
|
*before* the request to send the message completes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the first scenario, the client will receive an event ID when the request to
|
|
|
|
send the message completes. This ID can be used to identify the duplicate event
|
|
|
|
when it arrives on the event stream. However, in the second scenario, the event
|
|
|
|
arrives before the client has obtained an event ID. This makes it impossible to
|
|
|
|
identify it as a duplicate event. This results in the client displaying the
|
|
|
|
message twice for a fraction of a second before the the original request to send
|
|
|
|
the message completes. Once it completes, the client can take remedial actions
|
|
|
|
to remove the duplicate event by looking for duplicate event IDs. Version 2 of
|
|
|
|
the client-server API resolves this by attaching the transaction ID of the
|
|
|
|
sending request to the event itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Displaying membership information with messages
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients may wish to show the display name and avatar URL of the room member who
|
|
|
|
sent a message. This can be achieved by inspecting the ``m.room.member`` event
|
|
|
|
for that user ID.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a user paginates the message history, clients may wish to show the
|
|
|
|
**historical** display name and avatar URL for a room member. This is possible
|
|
|
|
because older ``m.room.member`` events are returned when paginating. This can
|
|
|
|
be implemented efficiently by keeping two sets of room state: old and current.
|
|
|
|
As new events arrive and/or the user paginates back in time, these two sets of
|
|
|
|
state diverge from each other. New events update the current state and paginated
|
|
|
|
events update the old state. When paginated events are processed sequentially,
|
|
|
|
the old state represents the state of the room *at the time the event was sent*.
|
|
|
|
This can then be used to set the historical display name and avatar URL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Server behaviour
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homeservers SHOULD enforce that ``m.room.message`` events have textual ``body``
|
|
|
|
and ``msgtype`` keys by 400ing the request to send a message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security considerations
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messages sent using this module are not encrypted. Encryption can be layered
|
|
|
|
over the top of this module: where the plaintext format is an ``m.room.message``
|
|
|
|
conforming to this module. This can be achieved using the `E2E module`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients should sanitise **all keys** for unsafe HTML to prevent Cross-Site
|
|
|
|
Scripting (XSS) attacks. This includes room names and topics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _`E2E module`: `module:e2e`_
|
|
|
|
|