|
|
|
.. Copyright 2016 OpenMarket Ltd
|
|
|
|
..
|
|
|
|
.. Licensed under the Apache License, Version 2.0 (the "License");
|
|
|
|
.. you may not use this file except in compliance with the License.
|
|
|
|
.. You may obtain a copy of the License at
|
|
|
|
..
|
|
|
|
.. http://www.apache.org/licenses/LICENSE-2.0
|
|
|
|
..
|
|
|
|
.. Unless required by applicable law or agreed to in writing, software
|
|
|
|
.. distributed under the License is distributed on an "AS IS" BASIS,
|
|
|
|
.. WITHOUT WARRANTIES OR CONDITIONS OF ANY KIND, either express or implied.
|
|
|
|
.. See the License for the specific language governing permissions and
|
|
|
|
.. limitations under the License.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instant Messaging
|
|
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _module:im:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This module adds support for sending human-readable messages to a room. It also
|
|
|
|
adds support for associating human-readable information with the room itself
|
|
|
|
such as a room name and topic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Events
|
|
|
|
------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{m_room_message_event}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{m_room_message_feedback_event}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Usage of this event is discouraged for several reasons:
|
|
|
|
- The number of feedback events will grow very quickly with the number of users
|
|
|
|
in the room. This event provides no way to "batch" feedback, unlike the
|
|
|
|
`receipts module`_.
|
|
|
|
- Pairing feedback to messages gets complicated when paginating as feedback
|
|
|
|
arrives before the message it is acknowledging.
|
|
|
|
- There are no guarantees that the client has seen the event ID being
|
|
|
|
acknowledged.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _`receipts module`: `module:receipts`_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{m_room_name_event}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{m_room_topic_event}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{m_room_avatar_event}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{m_room_pinned_events_event}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
m.room.message msgtypes
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Each `m.room.message`_ MUST have a ``msgtype`` key which identifies the type
|
|
|
|
of message being sent. Each type has their own required and optional keys, as
|
|
|
|
outlined below. If a client cannot display the given ``msgtype`` then it SHOULD
|
|
|
|
display the fallback plain text ``body`` key instead.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some message types support HTML in the event content that clients should prefer
|
|
|
|
to display if available. Currently ``m.text``, ``m.emote``, and ``m.notice``
|
|
|
|
support an additional ``format`` parameter of ``org.matrix.custom.html``. When
|
|
|
|
this field is present, a ``formatted_body`` with the HTML must be provided. The
|
|
|
|
plain text version of the HTML should be provided in the ``body``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients should limit the HTML they render to avoid Cross-Site Scripting, HTML
|
|
|
|
injection, and similar attacks. The strongly suggested set of HTML tags to permit,
|
|
|
|
denying the use and rendering of anything else, is: ``font``, ``del``, ``h1``,
|
|
|
|
``h2``, ``h3``, ``h4``, ``h5``, ``h6``, ``blockquote``, ``p``, ``a``, ``ul``,
|
|
|
|
``ol``, ``sup``, ``sub``, ``li``, ``b``, ``i``, ``u``, ``strong``, ``em``,
|
|
|
|
``strike``, ``code``, ``hr``, ``br``, ``div``, ``table``, ``thead``, ``tbody``,
|
|
|
|
``tr``, ``th``, ``td``, ``caption``, ``pre``, ``span``, ``img``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Not all attributes on those tags should be permitted as they may be avenues for
|
|
|
|
other disruption attempts, such as adding ``onclick`` handlers or excessively
|
|
|
|
large text. Clients should only permit the attributes listed for the tags below.
|
|
|
|
Where ``data-mx-bg-color`` and ``data-mx-color`` are listed, clients should
|
|
|
|
translate the value (a 6-character hex color code) to the appropriate CSS/attributes
|
|
|
|
for the tag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:``font``:
|
|
|
|
``data-mx-bg-color``, ``data-mx-color``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:``span``:
|
|
|
|
``data-mx-bg-color``, ``data-mx-color``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:``a``:
|
|
|
|
``name``, ``target``, ``href`` (provided the value is not relative and has a scheme
|
|
|
|
matching one of: ``https``, ``http``, ``ftp``, ``mailto``, ``magnet``)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:``img``:
|
|
|
|
``width``, ``height``, ``alt``, ``title``, ``src`` (provided it is a `Matrix Content (MXC) URI`_)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:``ol``:
|
|
|
|
``start``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
:``code``:
|
|
|
|
``class`` (only classes which start with ``language-`` for syntax highlighting)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, web clients should ensure that *all* ``a`` tags get a ``rel="noopener"``
|
|
|
|
to prevent the target page from referencing the client's tab/window.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Tags must not be nested more than 100 levels deep. Clients should only support the subset
|
|
|
|
of tags they can render, falling back to other representations of the tags where possible.
|
|
|
|
For example, a client may not be able to render tables correctly and instead could fall
|
|
|
|
back to rendering tab-delimited text.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In addition to not rendering unsafe HTML, clients should not emit unsafe HTML in events.
|
|
|
|
Likewise, clients should not generate HTML that is not needed, such as extra paragraph tags
|
|
|
|
surrounding text due to Rich Text Editors. HTML included in events should otherwise be valid,
|
|
|
|
such as having appropriate closing tags, appropriate attributes (considering the custom ones
|
|
|
|
defined in this specification), and generally valid structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A special tag, ``mx-reply``, may appear on rich replies (described below) and should be
|
|
|
|
allowed if, and only if, the tag appears as the very first tag in the ``formatted_body``.
|
|
|
|
The tag cannot be nested and cannot be located after another tag in the tree. Because the
|
|
|
|
tag contains HTML, an ``mx-reply`` is expected to have a partner closing tag and should
|
|
|
|
be treated similar to a ``div``. Clients that support rich replies will end up stripping
|
|
|
|
the tag and its contents and therefore may wish to exclude the tag entirely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. Note::
|
|
|
|
A future iteration of the specification will support more powerful and extensible
|
|
|
|
message formatting options, such as the proposal `MSC1225 <https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1225>`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{msgtype_events}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client behaviour
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients SHOULD verify the structure of incoming events to ensure that the
|
|
|
|
expected keys exist and that they are of the right type. Clients can discard
|
|
|
|
malformed events or display a placeholder message to the user. Redacted
|
|
|
|
``m.room.message`` events MUST be removed from the client. This can either be
|
|
|
|
replaced with placeholder text (e.g. "[REDACTED]") or the redacted message can
|
|
|
|
be removed entirely from the messages view.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Events which have attachments (e.g. ``m.image``, ``m.file``) SHOULD be
|
|
|
|
uploaded using the `content repository module`_ where available. The
|
|
|
|
resulting ``mxc://`` URI can then be used in the ``url`` key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients MAY include a client generated thumbnail image for an attachment under
|
|
|
|
a ``info.thumbnail_url`` key. The thumbnail SHOULD also be a ``mxc://`` URI.
|
|
|
|
Clients displaying events with attachments can either use the client generated
|
|
|
|
thumbnail or ask its homeserver to generate a thumbnail from the original
|
|
|
|
attachment using the `content repository module`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _`content repository module`: `module:content`_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Recommendations when sending messages
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the event of send failure, clients SHOULD retry requests using an
|
|
|
|
exponential-backoff algorithm for a
|
|
|
|
certain amount of time T. It is recommended that T is no longer than 5 minutes.
|
|
|
|
After this time, the client should stop retrying and mark the message as "unsent".
|
|
|
|
Users should be able to manually resend unsent messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Users may type several messages at once and send them all in quick succession.
|
|
|
|
Clients SHOULD preserve the order in which they were sent by the user. This
|
|
|
|
means that clients should wait for the response to the previous request before
|
|
|
|
sending the next request. This can lead to head-of-line blocking. In order to
|
|
|
|
reduce the impact of head-of-line blocking, clients should use a queue per room
|
|
|
|
rather than a global queue, as ordering is only relevant within a single room
|
|
|
|
rather than between rooms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Local echo
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messages SHOULD appear immediately in the message view when a user presses the
|
|
|
|
"send" button. This should occur even if the message is still sending. This is
|
|
|
|
referred to as "local echo". Clients SHOULD implement "local echo" of messages.
|
|
|
|
Clients MAY display messages in a different format to indicate that the server
|
|
|
|
has not processed the message. This format should be removed when the server
|
|
|
|
responds.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients need to be able to match the message they are sending with the same
|
|
|
|
message which they receive from the event stream. The echo of the same message
|
|
|
|
from the event stream is referred to as "remote echo". Both echoes need to be
|
|
|
|
identified as the same message in order to prevent duplicate messages being
|
|
|
|
displayed. Ideally this pairing would occur transparently to the user: the UI
|
|
|
|
would not flicker as it transitions from local to remote. Flickering can be
|
|
|
|
reduced through clients making use of the transaction ID they used to send
|
|
|
|
a particular event. The transaction ID used will be included in the event's
|
|
|
|
``unsigned`` data as ``transaction_id`` when it arrives through the event stream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients unable to make use of the transaction ID are likely to experience
|
|
|
|
flickering when the remote echo arrives on the event stream *before*
|
|
|
|
the request to send the message completes. In that case the event
|
|
|
|
arrives before the client has obtained an event ID, making it impossible to
|
|
|
|
identify it as a remote echo. This results in the client displaying the message
|
|
|
|
twice for some time (depending on the server responsiveness) before the original
|
|
|
|
request to send the message completes. Once it completes, the client can take
|
|
|
|
remedial actions to remove the duplicate event by looking for duplicate event IDs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculating the display name for a user
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients may wish to show the human-readable display name of a room member as
|
|
|
|
part of a membership list, or when they send a message. However, different
|
|
|
|
members may have conflicting display names. Display names MUST be disambiguated
|
|
|
|
before showing them to the user, in order to prevent spoofing of other users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To ensure this is done consistently across clients, clients SHOULD use the
|
|
|
|
following algorithm to calculate a disambiguated display name for a given user:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. Inspect the ``m.room.member`` state event for the relevant user id.
|
|
|
|
2. If the ``m.room.member`` state event has no ``displayname`` field, or if
|
|
|
|
that field has a ``null`` value, use the raw user id as the display
|
|
|
|
name. Otherwise:
|
|
|
|
3. If the ``m.room.member`` event has a ``displayname`` which is unique among
|
|
|
|
members of the room with ``membership: join`` or ``membership: invite``, use
|
|
|
|
the given ``displayname`` as the user-visible display name. Otherwise:
|
|
|
|
4. The ``m.room.member`` event has a non-unique ``displayname``. This should be
|
|
|
|
disambiguated using the user id, for example "display name
|
|
|
|
(@id:homeserver.org)".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. TODO-spec
|
|
|
|
what does it mean for a ``displayname`` to be 'unique'? Are we
|
|
|
|
case-sensitive? Do we care about homograph attacks? See
|
|
|
|
https://matrix.org/jira/browse/SPEC-221.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Developers should take note of the following when implementing the above
|
|
|
|
algorithm:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The user-visible display name of one member can be affected by changes in the
|
|
|
|
state of another member. For example, if ``@user1:matrix.org`` is present in
|
|
|
|
a room, with ``displayname: Alice``, then when ``@user2:example.com`` joins
|
|
|
|
the room, also with ``displayname: Alice``, *both* users must be given
|
|
|
|
disambiguated display names. Similarly, when one of the users then changes
|
|
|
|
their display name, there is no longer a clash, and *both* users can be given
|
|
|
|
their chosen display name. Clients should be alert to this possibility and
|
|
|
|
ensure that all affected users are correctly renamed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The display name of a room may also be affected by changes in the membership
|
|
|
|
list. This is due to the room name sometimes being based on user display
|
|
|
|
names (see `Calculating the display name for a room`_).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* If the entire membership list is searched for clashing display names, this
|
|
|
|
leads to an O(N^2) implementation for building the list of room members. This
|
|
|
|
will be very inefficient for rooms with large numbers of members. It is
|
|
|
|
recommended that client implementations maintain a hash table mapping from
|
|
|
|
``displayname`` to a list of room members using that name. Such a table can
|
|
|
|
then be used for efficient calculation of whether disambiguation is needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Displaying membership information with messages
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients may wish to show the display name and avatar URL of the room member who
|
|
|
|
sent a message. This can be achieved by inspecting the ``m.room.member`` state
|
|
|
|
event for that user ID (see `Calculating the display name for a user`_).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a user paginates the message history, clients may wish to show the
|
|
|
|
**historical** display name and avatar URL for a room member. This is possible
|
|
|
|
because older ``m.room.member`` events are returned when paginating. This can
|
|
|
|
be implemented efficiently by keeping two sets of room state: old and current.
|
|
|
|
As new events arrive and/or the user paginates back in time, these two sets of
|
|
|
|
state diverge from each other. New events update the current state and paginated
|
|
|
|
events update the old state. When paginated events are processed sequentially,
|
|
|
|
the old state represents the state of the room *at the time the event was sent*.
|
|
|
|
This can then be used to set the historical display name and avatar URL.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Calculating the display name for a room
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients may wish to show a human-readable name for a room. There are a number
|
|
|
|
of possibilities for choosing a useful name. To ensure that rooms are named
|
|
|
|
consistently across clients, clients SHOULD use the following algorithm to
|
|
|
|
choose a name:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. If the room has an `m.room.name`_ state event with a non-empty ``name``
|
|
|
|
field, use the name given by that field.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. If the room has an `m.room.canonical_alias`_ state event with a non-empty
|
|
|
|
``alias`` field, use the alias given by that field as the name.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. If neither of the above conditions are met, a name should be composed based
|
|
|
|
on the members of the room. Clients should consider `m.room.member`_ events
|
|
|
|
for users other than the logged-in user, with ``membership: join`` or
|
|
|
|
``membership: invite``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _active_members:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
i. If there is only one such event, the display name for the room should be
|
|
|
|
the `disambiguated display name`_ of the corresponding user.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. If there are two such events, they should be lexicographically sorted by
|
|
|
|
their ``state_key`` (i.e. the corresponding user IDs), and the display
|
|
|
|
name for the room should be the `disambiguated display name`_ of both
|
|
|
|
users: "<user1> and <user2>", or a localised variant thereof.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. If there are three or more such events, the display name for the room
|
|
|
|
should be based on the disambiguated display name of the user
|
|
|
|
corresponding to the first such event, under a lexicographical sorting
|
|
|
|
according to their ``state_key``. The display name should be in the
|
|
|
|
format "<user1> and <N> others" (or a localised variant thereof), where N
|
|
|
|
is the number of `m.room.member`_ events with ``membership: join`` or
|
|
|
|
``membership: invite``, excluding the logged-in user and "user1".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, if Alice joins a room, where Bob (whose user id is
|
|
|
|
``@superuser:example.com``), Carol (user id ``@carol:example.com``) and
|
|
|
|
Dan (user id ``@dan:matrix.org``) are in conversation, Alice's
|
|
|
|
client should show the room name as "Carol and 2 others".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. TODO-spec
|
|
|
|
Sorting by user_id certainly isn't ideal, as IDs at the start of the
|
|
|
|
alphabet will end up dominating room names: they will all be called
|
|
|
|
"Arathorn and 15 others". Furthermore - user_ids are not necessarily
|
|
|
|
ASCII, which means we need to either specify a collation order, or specify
|
|
|
|
how to choose one.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ideally we might sort by the time when the user was first invited to, or
|
|
|
|
first joined the room. But we don't have this information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
See https://matrix.org/jira/browse/SPEC-267 for further discussion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. If the room has no valid ``m.room.name`` or ``m.room.canonical_alias``
|
|
|
|
event, and no active members other than the current user, clients should
|
|
|
|
consider ``m.room.member`` events with ``membership: leave``. If such events
|
|
|
|
exist, a display name such as "Empty room (was <user1> and <N> others)" (or
|
|
|
|
a localised variant thereof) should be used, following similar rules as for
|
|
|
|
active members (see `above <active_members_>`_).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. A complete absence of room name, canonical alias, and room members is likely
|
|
|
|
to indicate a problem with creating the room or synchronising the state
|
|
|
|
table; however clients should still handle this situation. A display name
|
|
|
|
such as "Empty room" (or a localised variant thereof) should be used in this
|
|
|
|
situation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _`disambiguated display name`: `Calculating the display name for a user`_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients SHOULD NOT use `m.room.aliases`_ events as a source for room names, as
|
|
|
|
it is difficult for clients to agree on the best alias to use, and aliases can
|
|
|
|
change unexpectedly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. TODO-spec
|
|
|
|
How can we make this less painful for clients to implement, without forcing
|
|
|
|
an English-language implementation on them all? See
|
|
|
|
https://matrix.org/jira/browse/SPEC-425.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Forming relationships between events
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In some cases, events may wish to reference other events. This could be to form
|
|
|
|
a thread of messages for the user to follow along with, or to provide more context
|
|
|
|
as to what a particular event is describing. Currently, the only kind of relation
|
|
|
|
defined is a "rich reply" where a user may reference another message to create a
|
|
|
|
thread-like conversation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relationships are defined under an ``m.relates_to`` key in the event's ``content``.
|
|
|
|
If the event is of the type ``m.room.encrypted``, the ``m.relates_to`` key MUST NOT
|
|
|
|
be covered by the encryption and instead be put alongside the encryption information
|
|
|
|
held in the ``content``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rich replies
|
|
|
|
++++++++++++
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Users may wish to reference another message when forming their own message, and
|
|
|
|
clients may wish to better embed the referenced message for the user to have a
|
|
|
|
better context for the conversation being had. This sort of embedding another
|
|
|
|
message in a message is known as a "rich reply", or occasionally just a "reply".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A rich reply is formed through use of an ``m.relates_to`` relation for ``m.in_reply_to``
|
|
|
|
where a single key, ``event_id``, is used to reference the event being replied to.
|
|
|
|
The referenced event ID SHOULD belong to the same room where the reply is being sent.
|
|
|
|
Clients should be cautious of the event ID belonging to another room, or being invalid
|
|
|
|
entirely. Rich replies can only be constructed in the form of ``m.room.message`` events
|
|
|
|
with a ``msgtype`` of ``m.text`` or ``m.notice``. Due to the fallback requirements, rich
|
|
|
|
replies cannot be constructed for types of ``m.emote``, ``m.file``, etc. Rich replies
|
|
|
|
may reference any other ``m.room.message`` event, however. Rich replies may reference
|
|
|
|
another event which also has a rich reply, infinitely.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An ``m.in_reply_to`` relationship looks like the following::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.message",
|
|
|
|
"content": {
|
|
|
|
"msgtype": "m.text",
|
|
|
|
"body": "<body including fallback>",
|
|
|
|
"format": "org.matrix.custom.html",
|
|
|
|
"formatted_body": "<HTML including fallback>",
|
|
|
|
"m.relates_to": {
|
|
|
|
"m.in_reply_to": {
|
|
|
|
"event_id": "$another:event.com"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fallbacks and event representation
|
|
|
|
^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some clients may not have support for rich replies and therefore need a fallback
|
|
|
|
to use instead. Clients that do not support rich replies should render the event
|
|
|
|
as if rich replies were not special.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients that do support rich replies MUST provide the fallback format on replies,
|
|
|
|
and MUST strip the fallback before rendering the reply. Rich replies MUST have
|
|
|
|
a ``format`` of ``org.matrix.custom.html`` and therefore a ``formatted_body``
|
|
|
|
alongside the ``body`` and appropriate ``msgtype``. The specific fallback text
|
|
|
|
is different for each ``msgtype``, however the general format for the ``body`` is:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: text
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> <@alice:example.org> This is the original body
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is where the reply goes
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ``formatted_body`` should use the following template:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<mx-reply>
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://matrix.to/#/!somewhere:example.org/$event:example.org">In reply to</a>
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://matrix.to/#/@alice:example.org">@alice:example.org</a>
|
|
|
|
<br />
|
|
|
|
<!-- This is where the related event's HTML would be. -->
|
|
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
</mx-reply>
|
|
|
|
This is where the reply goes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the related event does not have a ``formatted_body``, the event's ``body`` should
|
|
|
|
be considered after encoding any HTML special characters. Note that the ``href`` in
|
|
|
|
both of the anchors use a `matrix.to URI <../appendices.html#matrix-to-navigation>`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Stripping the fallback
|
|
|
|
``````````````````````
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients which support rich replies MUST strip the fallback from the event before
|
|
|
|
rendering the event. This is because the text provided in the fallback cannot be
|
|
|
|
trusted to be an accurate representation of the event. After removing the fallback,
|
|
|
|
clients are recommended to represent the event referenced by ``m.in_reply_to``
|
|
|
|
similar to the fallback's representation, although clients do have creative freedom
|
|
|
|
for their user interface. Clients should prefer the ``formatted_body`` over the
|
|
|
|
``body``, just like with other ``m.room.message`` events.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To strip the fallback on the ``body``, the client should iterate over each line of
|
|
|
|
the string, removing any lines that start with the fallback prefix ("> ",
|
|
|
|
including the space, without quotes) and stopping when a line is encountered without
|
|
|
|
the prefix. This prefix is known as the "fallback prefix sequence".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To strip the fallback on the ``formatted_body``, the client should remove the
|
|
|
|
entirety of the ``mx-reply`` tag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fallback for ``m.text``, ``m.notice``, and unrecognised message types
|
|
|
|
`````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Using the prefix sequence, the first line of the related event's ``body`` should
|
|
|
|
be prefixed with the user's ID, followed by each line being prefixed with the fallback
|
|
|
|
prefix sequence. For example::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> <@alice:example.org> This is the first line
|
|
|
|
> This is the second line
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is the reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ``formatted_body`` uses the template defined earlier in this section.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fallback for ``m.emote``
|
|
|
|
````````````````````````
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Similar to the fallback for ``m.text``, each line gets prefixed with the fallback
|
|
|
|
prefix sequence. However an asterisk should be inserted before the user's ID, like
|
|
|
|
so::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> * <@alice:example.org> feels like today is going to be a great day
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is the reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The ``formatted_body`` has a subtle difference for the template where the asterisk
|
|
|
|
is also inserted ahead of the user's ID:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<mx-reply>
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://matrix.to/#/!somewhere:example.org/$event:example.org">In reply to</a>
|
|
|
|
* <a href="https://matrix.to/#/@alice:example.org">@alice:example.org</a>
|
|
|
|
<br />
|
|
|
|
<!-- This is where the related event's HTML would be. -->
|
|
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
</mx-reply>
|
|
|
|
This is where the reply goes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Fallback for ``m.image``, ``m.video``, ``m.audio``, and ``m.file``
|
|
|
|
``````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````````
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The related event's ``body`` would be a file name, which may not be very descriptive.
|
|
|
|
The related event should additionally not have a ``format`` or ``formatted_body``
|
|
|
|
in the ``content`` - if the event does have a ``format`` and/or ``formatted_body``,
|
|
|
|
those fields should be ignored. Because the filename alone may not be descriptive,
|
|
|
|
the related event's ``body`` should be considered to be ``"sent a file."`` such that
|
|
|
|
the output looks similar to the following::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
> <@alice:example.org> sent a file.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is the reply
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code-block:: html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
<mx-reply>
|
|
|
|
<blockquote>
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://matrix.to/#/!somewhere:example.org/$event:example.org">In reply to</a>
|
|
|
|
<a href="https://matrix.to/#/@alice:example.org">@alice:example.org</a>
|
|
|
|
<br />
|
|
|
|
sent a file.
|
|
|
|
</blockquote>
|
|
|
|
</mx-reply>
|
|
|
|
This is where the reply goes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For ``m.image``, the text should be ``"sent an image."``. For ``m.video``, the text
|
|
|
|
should be ``"sent a video."``. For ``m.audio``, the text should be ``"sent an audio file"``.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Server behaviour
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Homeservers SHOULD reject ``m.room.message`` events which don't have a
|
|
|
|
``msgtype`` key, or which don't have a textual ``body`` key, with an HTTP status
|
|
|
|
code of 400.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Security considerations
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messages sent using this module are not encrypted, although end to end encryption is in development (see `E2E module`_).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients should sanitise **all displayed keys** for unsafe HTML to prevent Cross-Site
|
|
|
|
Scripting (XSS) attacks. This includes room names and topics.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _`E2E module`: `module:e2e`_
|
|
|
|
.. _`Matrix Content (MXC) URI`: `module:content`_
|