MSC2422: Allow color on font tag
Signed-off-by: Nicolas Werner <nicolas.werner@hotmail.de>pull/2422/head
parent
6e3946f7bc
commit
b47de28da5
@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
|||||||
|
# MSC2422: Allow `color` as attribute for `<font>` in messages
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Currently the spec requires you to use `data-mx-color` instead of the standard
|
||||||
|
`color` html attribute for the `<font>` tag. This is probably done to make it
|
||||||
|
consistent with `<span>`, where you may not want to allow a generic style tag for.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
On the other hand the /rainbow command on almost every client just uses the
|
||||||
|
`color` attribute of the `<font>` tag. While some clients support
|
||||||
|
`data-mx-color` (i.e. Riot Web), most clients don't. Most clients support
|
||||||
|
rendering `color` however.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
It would probably be for the best to allow or even prefer `color` on the
|
||||||
|
`<font>` tag.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Proposal
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Add the `color` attribute to the allowed attributes of `<font>` in section
|
||||||
|
13.2.1.7. Allow only hexcodes as allowed value for this attribute for now.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Potential issues
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- We now have a redundant attribute in the spec. While it matches, what the
|
||||||
|
clients currently do, it may be better to fix each client instead.
|
||||||
|
- Clients may not sanitize the color attribute and will let other color values
|
||||||
|
through, increasing compatibility issues again.
|
||||||
|
- Clients may never support the data-mx-* attributes now.
|
||||||
|
- Old messages could loose their color
|
||||||
|
- This proposal doesn't touch span at all, maybe it should?
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
## Alternatives
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
- fix the clients
|
||||||
|
- remove the `data-mx-color` and `data-mx-bg-color` attributes entirely, leaving
|
||||||
|
us just with `color` for `<font>`
|
||||||
|
- Add a section to tell the clients to prefer `color` over `mx-data-color`
|
||||||
|
- Spec an entirely different format for messages (that would probably not make
|
||||||
|
this proposal obsolete)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue