|
|
|
Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
=================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. contents:: Table of Contents
|
|
|
|
.. sectnum::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Summary of changes from v1
|
|
|
|
==========================
|
|
|
|
Included:
|
|
|
|
- Event filtering (type/room/users, federation-style events)
|
|
|
|
- Incremental syncing
|
|
|
|
- Rejecting invites
|
|
|
|
- Deleting state
|
|
|
|
- Contextual messages (view messages around an arbitrary message)
|
|
|
|
- Race conditions on event stream / actions
|
|
|
|
- Out-of-order events
|
|
|
|
- Capabilities
|
|
|
|
- Comments (relates_to key)
|
|
|
|
- Editing/updating messages (updates key)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Excluded:
|
|
|
|
- Searching messages
|
|
|
|
- State event pagination (see Global /initialSync API)
|
|
|
|
- Initial sync pagination (see Global /initialSync API)
|
|
|
|
- PATCHing power levels
|
|
|
|
- Handling "duplicate" events in state/messages key on initial sync.
|
|
|
|
- Multiple devices (other than VoIP)
|
|
|
|
- Room directory lists (aka public room list, paginating, permissions on
|
|
|
|
editing the list, etc)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Version 2 API
|
|
|
|
=============
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Legend:
|
|
|
|
- ``[TODO]``: API is not in this document yet.
|
|
|
|
- ``[ONGOING]``: API is proposed but needs more work. There are known issues to be
|
|
|
|
addressed.
|
|
|
|
- ``[Draft]``: API is proposed and has no outstanding issues to be addressed, but
|
|
|
|
needs more feedback.
|
|
|
|
- ``[Final]``: The API has no outstanding issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This contains the formal proposal for Matrix Client-Server API v2. This API
|
|
|
|
would completely replace v1. It is a general API, not specific to any particular
|
|
|
|
protocol e.g. HTTP. The following APIs will remain unchanged from v1:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Registration API
|
|
|
|
- Login API
|
|
|
|
- Content repository API
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This version will change the path prefix for HTTP:
|
|
|
|
- Version 1: ``/_matrix/client/api/v1``
|
|
|
|
- Version 2: ``/_matrix/client/v2``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note the lack of the ``api`` segment. This is for consistency between other
|
|
|
|
home server path prefixes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Filter API ``[ONGOING]``
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
.. NOTE::
|
|
|
|
- Exactly what can be filtered? Which APIs use this? Are we
|
|
|
|
conflating too much?
|
|
|
|
- Do we want to specify negative filters (e.g. don't give me
|
|
|
|
``event.type.here`` events)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Which event types (incl wildcards)
|
|
|
|
- Which room IDs
|
|
|
|
- Which user IDs (for profile/presence)
|
|
|
|
- Whether you want federation-style event JSON
|
|
|
|
- Whether you want coalesced ``updates`` events
|
|
|
|
- Whether you want coalesced ``relates_to`` events (and the max # to coalesce)
|
|
|
|
- limit= param?
|
|
|
|
- Which keys to return for events? e.g. no ``origin_server_ts`` if you don't
|
|
|
|
show timestamps
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- An opaque token which represents the inputs
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- The token may expire, in which case you would need to request another one.
|
|
|
|
- The token could be as simple as a concatenation of the requested filters with
|
|
|
|
a delimiter between them.
|
|
|
|
- Omitting the token on APIs results in ALL THE THINGS coming down.
|
|
|
|
- Clients should remember which token they need to use for which API.
|
|
|
|
- HTTP note: If the filter API is a separate endpoint, then you could easily
|
|
|
|
allow APIs which use filtering to ALSO specifiy query parameters to tweak the
|
|
|
|
filter.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Global initial sync API ``[ONGOING]``
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
.. NOTE::
|
|
|
|
- Will need some form of state event pagination like we have for message events
|
|
|
|
to handle large amounts of state events for a room. Need to think of the
|
|
|
|
consequences of this: you may not get a ``m.room.member`` for someone's
|
|
|
|
message and so cannot display their display name / avatar. Do we want to
|
|
|
|
provide pagination on an event type basis?
|
|
|
|
- Handle paginating initial sync results themselves (e.g. 10 most recent rooms)
|
|
|
|
- No need for state events under the 'state' key to have a ``prev_content``.
|
|
|
|
Can also apply some optimisations depending on the direction of travel when
|
|
|
|
scrolling back.
|
|
|
|
- Do we want to treat global / specific room initial syncs as separate entities?
|
|
|
|
Aren't they just a filter?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- A way of identifying the user (e.g. access token, user ID, etc)
|
|
|
|
- Streaming token (optional)
|
|
|
|
- Which state event types to return (e.g. ``m.room.name`` / ``m.room.topic``
|
|
|
|
/ ``m.room.aliases``)
|
|
|
|
- Filter to apply
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- For each room the user is joined:
|
|
|
|
- Requested state events
|
|
|
|
- # members
|
|
|
|
- max of limit= message events
|
|
|
|
- room ID
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- If a streaming token is applied, you will get a delta rather than all the
|
|
|
|
rooms.
|
|
|
|
What data flows does it address:
|
|
|
|
- Home screen: data required on load.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Event Stream API ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
----------------------------
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Position in the stream
|
|
|
|
- Filter to apply: which event types, which room IDs, whether to get
|
|
|
|
out-of-order events, which users to get presence/profile updates for
|
|
|
|
- User ID
|
|
|
|
- Device ID
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- 0-N events the client hasn't seen. NB: Deleted state events will be missing a
|
|
|
|
``content`` key. Deleted message events are ``m.room.redaction`` events.
|
|
|
|
- New position in the stream.
|
|
|
|
State Events Ordering Notes:
|
|
|
|
- Home servers may receive state events over federation that are superceded by
|
|
|
|
state events previously sent to the client. The home server *cannot* send
|
|
|
|
these events to the client else they would end up erroneously clobbering the
|
|
|
|
superceding state event.
|
|
|
|
- As a result, the home server reserves the right to omit sending state events
|
|
|
|
which are known to be superceded already.
|
|
|
|
- This may result in missed *state* events. However, the state of the room will
|
|
|
|
always be eventually consistent.
|
|
|
|
Message Events Ordering Notes:
|
|
|
|
- Home servers may receive message events over federation that happened a long
|
|
|
|
time ago. The client may or may not be interested in these message events.
|
|
|
|
- For clients which do not store scrollback for a room (they discard events
|
|
|
|
after processing them), this is not a problem as they only care about the
|
|
|
|
recent messages.
|
|
|
|
- For clients which do persist scrollback for a room, they need to know about
|
|
|
|
the message event and where to insert it so that scrollback remains
|
|
|
|
consistent and doesn't omit messages.
|
|
|
|
- Clients can specify an input parameter stating that they wish to receive
|
|
|
|
these out-of-order events.
|
|
|
|
- The event, when it comes down the stream, will indicate which event it comes
|
|
|
|
after.
|
|
|
|
Rejected events:
|
|
|
|
- A home server may find out via federation that it should not have accepted
|
|
|
|
an event (e.g. to send a message/state event in a room).
|
|
|
|
- If this happens, the home server will send a ``m.room.redaction`` for the
|
|
|
|
event in question. This will be a local server event (not shared with other
|
|
|
|
servers).
|
|
|
|
- If the event was a state event, it will synthesise a new state event to
|
|
|
|
correct the client's room state. This will be a local server event (not
|
|
|
|
shared with other servers).
|
|
|
|
- In practice, clients don't need any extra special handling for this.
|
|
|
|
Unknown rooms:
|
|
|
|
- You could receive events for rooms you are unaware of (e.g. you didn't do an
|
|
|
|
initial sync, or your HS lost its database and is told from another HS that
|
|
|
|
they are in this room). How do you handle this?
|
|
|
|
- The simplest option would be to redo the initial sync with a filter on the
|
|
|
|
room ID you're unaware of. This would retrieve the room state so you can
|
|
|
|
display the room.
|
|
|
|
What data flows does it address:
|
|
|
|
- Home Screen: Data required when new message arrives for a room
|
|
|
|
- Home Screen: Data required when someone invites you to a room
|
|
|
|
- Home Screen: Data required when you leave a room on another device
|
|
|
|
- Home Screen: Data required when you join a room on another device
|
|
|
|
- Home Screen: Data required when your profile info changes on another device
|
|
|
|
- Chat Screen: Data required when member name changes
|
|
|
|
- Chat Screen: Data required when the room name changes
|
|
|
|
- Chat Screen: Data required when a new message arrives
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Room Creation API ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
-----------------------------
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Invitee list of user IDs, public/private, state events to set on creation
|
|
|
|
e.g. name of room, alias of room, topic of room
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
- Room ID
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- This is a special case of joining a room. See the notes on joining a room.
|
|
|
|
What data flows does it address:
|
|
|
|
- Home Screen: Creating a room
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Joining API ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
-----------------------
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Room ID (with list of servers to join from) / room alias / invite event ID
|
|
|
|
- Optional filter (which events to return, whether the returned events should
|
|
|
|
come down the event stream)
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- Room ID, the returned state events from the filter e.g. Room aliases
|
|
|
|
(plural), Name, topic, member list (f.e. member: user ID, avatar, presence,
|
|
|
|
display name, power level, whether they are typing), enough messages to fill
|
|
|
|
screen (and whether there are more)
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- How do you return room information? In response to the join, or from the
|
|
|
|
event stream?
|
|
|
|
- The events returned need to be filterable. Different clients for the same
|
|
|
|
user may want different information (e.g. the client performing the join may
|
|
|
|
jump to the chat screen and therefore want some messages, whereas the client
|
|
|
|
not performing the join just needs to be aware of the new room).
|
|
|
|
- As a result, the join response should return events *instead of* to the
|
|
|
|
event stream, depending on the client.
|
|
|
|
Mapping messages to the event stream:
|
|
|
|
- Once you join a room, you will start getting message events for it. How do
|
|
|
|
you know when you started getting events for this room? You need to know so
|
|
|
|
you can provide a token when scrolling back. You cannot currently infer this
|
|
|
|
from the join event itself, as individual events do not have tokens (only
|
|
|
|
chunks do).
|
|
|
|
- This token can be provided as a separate server-generated event, or an
|
|
|
|
annotation on the join event itself.
|
|
|
|
- We propose that a server-generated event is sent down the event stream to all
|
|
|
|
clients, rather than annotating the join event. The server-generated event
|
|
|
|
works nicely for Application Services where an entity subscribes to a room
|
|
|
|
without a join event.
|
|
|
|
- This will look like an event for the room, but have a special
|
|
|
|
"server-generated" event type e.g. ``m.homeserver.scrollback`` with a
|
|
|
|
``token`` containing the start token for the room.
|
|
|
|
What data flows does it address:
|
|
|
|
- Home Screen: Joining a room
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Scrollback API ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
.. NOTE::
|
|
|
|
- Pagination: Would be nice to have "and X more". It will probably be
|
|
|
|
Google-style estimates given we can't know the exact number over federation,
|
|
|
|
but as a purely informational display thing it would be nice.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Identifier for the earliest event
|
|
|
|
- # requested events
|
|
|
|
- filter to apply
|
|
|
|
- flag to say if the home server should do a backfill over federation
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- requested events (f.e change in display name, what the old name was),
|
|
|
|
- whether there are more events on the local HS / over federation.
|
|
|
|
- new identifier for the earliest event
|
|
|
|
What data flows does it address:
|
|
|
|
- Chat Screen: Scrolling back (infinite scrolling)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Contextual windowing API ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
This refers to showing a "window" of message events around a given message
|
|
|
|
event. The window provides the "context" for the given message event.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Event ID of the message to get the surrounding context for (this specifies
|
|
|
|
the room to get messages in).
|
|
|
|
- Number of messages before/after this message to obtain.
|
|
|
|
- Filter to apply.
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- Chunk of messages
|
|
|
|
- Start / End pagination tokens
|
|
|
|
- Current room state at the end of the chunk as per initial sync.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Room Alias API ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
-------------------------
|
|
|
|
This provides mechanisms for creating and removing room aliases for a room on a
|
|
|
|
home server. Typically, any user in a room can make an alias for that room. The
|
|
|
|
alias creator (or anyone in the room?) can delete that alias. Server admins can
|
|
|
|
also delete any alias on their server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mapping a room alias to a room:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Room Alias
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
- Room ID
|
|
|
|
- List of home servers to join via.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Mapping a room to an alias:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Room ID
|
|
|
|
- Desired room alias localpart
|
|
|
|
- User ID (for auth)
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
- Room alias
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- The home server may add restrictions e.g. the user must be in the room.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deleting a mapping:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Room alias
|
|
|
|
- User ID (for auth)
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
- None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Public room list API ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
--------------------------------
|
|
|
|
This provides mechanisms for searching for public rooms on a home server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Search text (e.g. room alias/name/topic to search on)
|
|
|
|
- Home server to search on (this may just be the URL hit for HTTP)
|
|
|
|
- Any existing pagination token
|
|
|
|
- Limit for pagination
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
- Pagination token
|
|
|
|
- Total number of rooms
|
|
|
|
- Which 'page' of results this response represents
|
|
|
|
- A list of rooms with:
|
|
|
|
- # users
|
|
|
|
- A set of 'public' room state events, presumably ``m.room.name``,
|
|
|
|
``m.room.topic`` and ``m.room.aliases``. This cannot be user-configured
|
|
|
|
since the user is not in the room.
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- This API would be hit again for the next page of results, with the pagination
|
|
|
|
token provided from the previous hit.
|
|
|
|
- We should probably provide "and X more" estimates for the number of
|
|
|
|
pagination results. This can be calculated by providing the total number of
|
|
|
|
rooms e.g. '100' and the page e.g. '3' coupled with the limit parameter (aka
|
|
|
|
the number of results per page) specified e.g. '10'.
|
|
|
|
- In order to prevent the dataset from changing underneath the client whilst
|
|
|
|
they paginate, a request without a pagination token should take a "snapshot"
|
|
|
|
of the underlying data which is then paginated on, rather than the database
|
|
|
|
which is a moving target as other clients add new public rooms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
User Profile API ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
---------------------------
|
|
|
|
Every user on a home server has a profile. This profile is effectively a
|
|
|
|
key-value store scoped to a user ID. It can include an ``avatar_url``,
|
|
|
|
``displayname`` and other metadata. Updates to a profile should propagate to
|
|
|
|
other interested users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Setting display name (strings):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- User ID
|
|
|
|
- New display name
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
- None.
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- This is a generic problem, so should probably not be special cased for
|
|
|
|
display names. E.g. having an arbitrary key-value store here.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Setting avatar url (blob data):
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- User ID
|
|
|
|
- New avatar url / file blob?
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
- None.
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- We may want to provide file uploading on this API for convenience.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Retrieving profile information:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- User ID
|
|
|
|
- Which keys to retrieve
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
- The key/values specified.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Propagation
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
The goals of propagation are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Profile updates should propagate to all rooms the user is in.
|
|
|
|
- We should support different kinds of profiles for different rooms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In v1, users have a single profile. This information is duplicated for
|
|
|
|
every room the user is in. This duplication means that things like
|
|
|
|
display names *could* change on a room-by-room basis. However, this is
|
|
|
|
extremely inefficient when updating the display name, as you have to
|
|
|
|
send ``num_joined_rooms`` events to inform everyone of the update.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
There's no easy solution to this. The room needs a record of the name
|
|
|
|
changes; it's not good enough to send it just to the users (the set of
|
|
|
|
all users in all rooms the user changing their display name is in), as
|
|
|
|
new users who join later still need to know about these changes. The
|
|
|
|
ordering information needs to be preserved as well.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An improvement would be to allow the client to not automatically share
|
|
|
|
updates of their profile information to all rooms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Action APIs
|
|
|
|
-----------
|
|
|
|
The following APIs are "action APIs". This is defined to be a request which
|
|
|
|
alters the state of a room you are already joined to.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When you perform an action in a room, you immediately want to display the local
|
|
|
|
echo. The client can receive the response to the action either directly or from
|
|
|
|
the event stream. The order in which you receive these responses is undefined.
|
|
|
|
As a result, clients MUST be able to handle all possible orderings::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1 2a 3
|
|
|
|
START ----> REQUEST SENT ---> RESPONSE TO REQUEST RECEIVED --------> GOT BOTH
|
|
|
|
| ^
|
|
|
|
| 2b |
|
|
|
|
+----------> APPEARS IN EVENT STREAM -------------------+
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1: Can display local echo at this point.
|
|
|
|
2a: The request has been successfully processed and can be displayed as Sent.
|
|
|
|
2b/3: The request has been successfully processed and the client knows its
|
|
|
|
position in the event stream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a client sends a request, they can include an "action ID" so that they can
|
|
|
|
match up the event in the event stream to the request which they made. This ID
|
|
|
|
is created by the client, and MUST be a monotonically increasing integer for
|
|
|
|
that client. This ID serves as a transaction ID for idempotency as well as a
|
|
|
|
sequence ID for ordering actions performed in parallel by that client. Events
|
|
|
|
for actions performed by a client in that client's event stream will include the
|
|
|
|
action ID the client submitted when making the request. The action ID will *not*
|
|
|
|
appear in other client's event streams.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Action IDs are optional and are only needed by clients that retransmit their
|
|
|
|
requests, or display local echo, or allow the submission of multiple requests
|
|
|
|
in parallel. An example of a client which may not need the use of action IDs
|
|
|
|
includes bots which operate using basic request/responses in a synchronous
|
|
|
|
fashion.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inviting a user ``[Final]``
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- User ID
|
|
|
|
- Room ID
|
|
|
|
- Action ID (optional)
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- Display name / avatar of user invited (if known)
|
|
|
|
What data flows does it address:
|
|
|
|
- Chat Screen: Invite a user
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Rejecting an invite ``[Final]``
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Event ID (to know which invite you're rejecting)
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- None.
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- Giving the event ID rather than user ID/room ID combo because mutliple users
|
|
|
|
can invite the same user into the same room.
|
|
|
|
- Rejecting an invite results in the ``m.room.member`` state event being
|
|
|
|
DELETEd for that user.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sending state events ``[Final]``
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Event type
|
|
|
|
- State key
|
|
|
|
- Room ID
|
|
|
|
- Content
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Deleting state events ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Event type
|
|
|
|
- State key
|
|
|
|
- Room ID
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- None.
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- This is represented on the event stream as an event lacking a ``content``
|
|
|
|
key (for symmetry with ``prev_content``)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Read-up-to markers ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- State Event type (``m.room.marker.delivered`` and ``m.room.marker.read``)
|
|
|
|
- Event ID to mark up to. This is inclusive of the event ID specified.
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- None.
|
|
|
|
Efficiency notes:
|
|
|
|
- Sending "read up to" markers is preferable to sending receipts for every
|
|
|
|
message due to scaling problems on the client with one receipt per message.
|
|
|
|
This results in an ever increasing amount of bandwidth being devoted to
|
|
|
|
receipts and not messages.
|
|
|
|
- For individual receipts, each person would need to send at least 1 receipt
|
|
|
|
for every message, which would give a total number of ``msgs * num_people``
|
|
|
|
receipts per room. Assuming that people in a room generally converse at say
|
|
|
|
a rate of 1 message per unit time, this scales ``n^2`` on the number of
|
|
|
|
people in the room.
|
|
|
|
- Sending "read up to" markers in contrast allows people to skip some messages
|
|
|
|
entirely. By making them state events, each user would clobber their own
|
|
|
|
marker, keeping the scaling at ``n``. For scrollback, the event filter would
|
|
|
|
NOT want to retrieve these markers as they will be updated frequently.
|
|
|
|
- This primarily benefits clients when doing an initial sync. Event graphs
|
|
|
|
will still have a lot of events, most of them from clobbering these state
|
|
|
|
events. Some gains can be made by skipping receipts, but it is difficult to
|
|
|
|
judge whether this would be substantial.
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- What do you do if you get a marker for an event you don't have? Do you fall
|
|
|
|
back to some kind of ordering heuristic e.g. ``if origin_server_ts >
|
|
|
|
latest message``. Do you request that event ID directly from the HS? How do
|
|
|
|
you fit that in to the message thread if you did so? Would probably have to
|
|
|
|
fall back to the timestamp heuristic. After all, these markers are only ever
|
|
|
|
going to be heuristics given they are not acknowledging each message event.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Kicking a user ``[Final]``
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- User ID
|
|
|
|
- Room ID
|
|
|
|
- Action ID (optional)
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- None.
|
|
|
|
What data flows does it address:
|
|
|
|
- Chat Screen: Kick a user
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Leaving a room ``[Final]``
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Room ID
|
|
|
|
- A way of identifying the user (user ID, access token)
|
|
|
|
- Action ID (optional)
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- None.
|
|
|
|
What data flows does it address:
|
|
|
|
- Chat Screen: Leave a room
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Send a message ``[ONGOING]``
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
.. NOTE::
|
|
|
|
Semantics for HTTP ordering. Do we really want to block requests with higher
|
|
|
|
sequence numbers if the server hasn't received earlier ones? Is this even
|
|
|
|
practical, given clients have a limit on the number of concurrent connections?
|
|
|
|
How can this be done in a way which doesn't suck for clients? Could we just
|
|
|
|
say "it isn't 'Sent' until it comes back down your event stream"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Room ID
|
|
|
|
- Message contents
|
|
|
|
- Action ID (optional)
|
|
|
|
- Whether the full event should be returned, or a compact version (default=full)
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- The actual event sent incl content OR:
|
|
|
|
- The extra keys added or keys modified e.g. 'content' from a policy server
|
|
|
|
(if compact=true)
|
|
|
|
What data flows does it address:
|
|
|
|
- Chat Screen: Send a Message
|
|
|
|
Ordering notes:
|
|
|
|
- HTTP: When sending a message with a higher seqnum, it will block the request
|
|
|
|
until it receives earlier seqnums. The block will expire after a timeout and
|
|
|
|
reject the message stating that it was missing a seqnum.
|
|
|
|
E2E Notes:
|
|
|
|
- For signing: You send the original message to the HS and it will return the
|
|
|
|
full event JSON which will be sent. This full event is then signed and sent
|
|
|
|
to the HS again to send the message.
|
|
|
|
Compact flag notes:
|
|
|
|
- You need to know information about the event sent, including the event ID,
|
|
|
|
timestamp, etc.
|
|
|
|
- Default behaviour will return the entire event JSON sent to make client
|
|
|
|
implementations simple (just clobber it).
|
|
|
|
- It sucks to have your own messages echoed back to you in response though.
|
|
|
|
As a result, you can ask for a compact version which just sends down the
|
|
|
|
keys which were added, e.g. timestamp and event ID.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presence API ``[ONGOING]``
|
|
|
|
--------------------------
|
|
|
|
.. NOTE::
|
|
|
|
- Per device presence: how does this work? Union of devices? Priority order for
|
|
|
|
statuses? E.g. online trumps away trumps offline. So if any device is online,
|
|
|
|
then the user is online, etc.
|
|
|
|
- Presence lists / roster? We probably do want this, but are we happy with the
|
|
|
|
v1 semantics?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a session starts, the home server can treat the user as "online". When the
|
|
|
|
session ends, the home server can treat the user as "offline".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Presence state (online, offline, away, busy, do not disturb, etc)
|
|
|
|
Outputs:
|
|
|
|
- None.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Typing API ``[ONGOING]``
|
|
|
|
------------------------
|
|
|
|
.. NOTE::
|
|
|
|
- Linking the termination of typing events to the message itself, so you don't
|
|
|
|
need to send two events and don't get flicker?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When in a session, a user can send a request stating that they are typing in a
|
|
|
|
room. They are no longer typing when either the session ends or they explicitly
|
|
|
|
send another request to say they are no longer typing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Room ID
|
|
|
|
- Whether you are typing or not.
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
- None.
|
|
|
|
Notes:
|
|
|
|
- Typing will time out when the session ends. If a session is restarted, the
|
|
|
|
typing notification must be sent again.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relates-to pagination API ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
-------------------------------------
|
|
|
|
See the "Relates to" section for more info.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Event ID
|
|
|
|
- Pagination token
|
|
|
|
- limit
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
- A chunk of child events
|
|
|
|
- A new pagination token for earlier child events.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Capabilities API ``[ONGOING]``
|
|
|
|
------------------------------
|
|
|
|
.. NOTE::
|
|
|
|
- Server capabilities: Keep hashing step for consistency or not? Extra request
|
|
|
|
if we do.
|
|
|
|
- Client capabilities: Clients which are offline but can be pushed should have
|
|
|
|
their capabilities visible. How to manage unregistering them e.g. if they
|
|
|
|
uninstall the app? Have a set of 'offline' capabilities?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
How does a client know if the server it is using supports a content repository?
|
|
|
|
How does a client know if another client has VoIP support? This section outlines
|
|
|
|
capability publishing for servers, clients and federation.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Server
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
- List of extensions it supports (e.g. content repo, contact repo, turn servers)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- User ID (e.g. only @bob can use the content repo)
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
- Hash of the capabilities::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
"sha256": "fD876SFrt3sugh23FWEjio3"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This hash is fed into another API:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- The hash of the capabilities
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
- A list of capabilities::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
"custom.feature.v1": {},
|
|
|
|
"m.cap.turnserver.v1": {}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Client
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
- e.g. Whether this client supports VoIP
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a session is started, the client needs to provide a capability set. The
|
|
|
|
server will take the hashes of all the user's connected clients' capability
|
|
|
|
sets and send the list of hashes as part of presence information
|
|
|
|
(not necesarily as a ``m.presence`` event, but it should act like presence
|
|
|
|
events). It is sent as a list instead of a union of hashes because hashes work
|
|
|
|
best when they don't change. A union of many devices' hashes will change
|
|
|
|
frequently when devices come on and offline (``max hashes = 2^num_devices``).
|
|
|
|
In contrast, the size of the list would vary, but the hashes themselves
|
|
|
|
would remain the same for a given device (``max hashes = num_devices``). Keeping
|
|
|
|
the hashes the same is the best as that means clients do not need to request
|
|
|
|
the capabilities for the given hash.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
On first signup, the client will attempt to send the hash and be most likely
|
|
|
|
refused by the home server as it does not know the full capability set for that
|
|
|
|
hash. The client will then have to upload the full capability set to the home
|
|
|
|
server. The client will then be able to send the hash as normal.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a client receives a hash, the client will either recognise the hash or
|
|
|
|
will have to request the capability set from their home server:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Inputs:
|
|
|
|
- Hash
|
|
|
|
- User ID
|
|
|
|
Output:
|
|
|
|
- A list of capabilities
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Federation
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
- e.g. Whether you support backfill, hypothetical search/query/threading APIs
|
|
|
|
- Same as the server capability API
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
VoIP ``[TODO]``
|
|
|
|
---------------
|
|
|
|
This addresses one-to-one calling with multiple devices. This uses the
|
|
|
|
``updates`` key to handle signalling.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Event updates
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
- Call is placed by caller. Event generated with offer.
|
|
|
|
- 1-N callees may pick up or reject this offer.
|
|
|
|
- Callees update the event (with sdp answer if they are accepting the call)
|
|
|
|
- Caller acknowledges *one* of the callees (either one which picked up or
|
|
|
|
rejected) by updating the event.
|
|
|
|
- Callees who weren't chosen then give up (Answered elsewhere, Rejected
|
|
|
|
elsewhere, etc)
|
|
|
|
- Update with ICE candidates as they appear.
|
|
|
|
- ... in call ...
|
|
|
|
- Send hangup update when hanging up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Placing a call
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
caller callee
|
|
|
|
|-----m.call.invite--->|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|<----m.call.answer----|
|
|
|
|
| device_id=foo |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|------m.call.ack----->|
|
|
|
|
| device_id=foo |
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|<--m.call.candidate---|
|
|
|
|
|---m.call.candidate-->|
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
[...] [...]
|
|
|
|
| |
|
|
|
|
|<----m.call.hangup----|
|
|
|
|
| device_id=foo |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expiry
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
- WIP: Of invites
|
|
|
|
- WIP: Of calls themselves (as they may never send a ``m.call.hangup``
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
General client changes
|
|
|
|
----------------------
|
|
|
|
These are changes which do not introduce new APIs, but are required for the new
|
|
|
|
APIs in order to fix certain issues.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Sessions ``[ONGOING]``
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
.. NOTE::
|
|
|
|
- Offline mode? How does that work with sessions? Separate endpoint to say
|
|
|
|
"start a session only"?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A session is a group of requests sent within a short amount of time by the same
|
|
|
|
client. Sessions time out after a short amount of time without any requests.
|
|
|
|
Starting a session is known as going "online". Its purpose is to wrap up the
|
|
|
|
expiry of presence and typing notifications into a clearer scope. A session
|
|
|
|
starts when the client makes any request. A session ends when the client doesn't
|
|
|
|
make a request for a particular amount of time (times out). A session can also
|
|
|
|
end when explicitly hitting a particular endpoint. This is known as going
|
|
|
|
"offline".
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a session starts, a session ID is sent in response to the first request the
|
|
|
|
client makes. This session ID should be sent in *all* subsequent requests. If
|
|
|
|
the server expires a session and the client uses an old session ID, the server
|
|
|
|
should fail the request with the old session ID and send a new session ID in
|
|
|
|
response for the client to use. If the client receives a new session ID
|
|
|
|
mid-session, it must re-establish its typing status and presence status, as they
|
|
|
|
are linked to the session ID.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Action IDs ``[ONGOING]``
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
.. NOTE::
|
|
|
|
- HTTP Ordering: Blocking requests with higher seqnums is troublesome if there
|
|
|
|
is a max # of concurrent connections a client can have open.
|
|
|
|
- Session expiry: Do we really have to fonx the request if it was done with an
|
|
|
|
old session ID?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Action IDs are scoped per session. The first action ID for a session should be
|
|
|
|
0. For each subsequent action request, the ID should be incremented by 1. It
|
|
|
|
should be reset to 0 when a new session starts.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the client sends an action request with a stale session ID, the home server
|
|
|
|
MUST fail the request and start a new session. The request needs to be failed
|
|
|
|
in order to avoid edge cases with incrementing action IDs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Updates (Events) ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Events may update other events. This is represented by the ``updates`` key. This
|
|
|
|
is a key which contains the event ID for the event it relates to. Events that
|
|
|
|
relate to other events are referred to as "Child Events". The event being
|
|
|
|
related to is referred to as "Parent Events". Child events cannot stand alone as
|
|
|
|
a separate entity; they require the parent event in order to make sense.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bundling
|
|
|
|
++++++++
|
|
|
|
Events that relate to another event should come down inside that event. That is,
|
|
|
|
the top-level event should come down with all the child events at the same time.
|
|
|
|
This is called a "bundle" and it is represented as an array of events inside the
|
|
|
|
top-level event.There are some issues with this however:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Scrollback: Should you be told about child events for which you do not know
|
|
|
|
the parent event? Conclusion: No you shouldn't be told about child events.
|
|
|
|
You will receive them when you scroll back to the parent event.
|
|
|
|
- Pagination of child events: You don't necessarily want to have 1000000s of
|
|
|
|
child events with the parent event. We can't reasonably paginate child events
|
|
|
|
because we require all the child events in order to display the event
|
|
|
|
correctly. Comments on a message should be done via another technique,
|
|
|
|
such as ``relates_to``.
|
|
|
|
- Do you allow child events to relate to other child events? There is no
|
|
|
|
technical reason why we cannot nest child events, however we can't think of
|
|
|
|
any use cases for it. The behaviour would be to get the child events
|
|
|
|
recursively from the top-level event.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main use cases for ``updates``:
|
|
|
|
- Call signalling (child events are ICE candidates, answer to the offer, and
|
|
|
|
termination)
|
|
|
|
- *Local* Delivery/Read receipts : "Local" means they are not shared with other
|
|
|
|
users on the same home server or via federation but *are* shared between
|
|
|
|
clients for the same user; useful for push notifications, read count markers,
|
|
|
|
etc. This is done to avoid the ``n^2`` problem for sending receipts, where
|
|
|
|
the vast majority of traffic tends towards sending more receipts.
|
|
|
|
- s/foo/bar/ style message edits
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients *always* need to know how to apply the deltas because clients may
|
|
|
|
receive the events separately down the event stream. Combining event updates
|
|
|
|
server-side does not make client implementation simpler, as the client still
|
|
|
|
needs to know how to combine the events.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Relates to (Events) ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
Events may be in response to other events, e.g. comments. This is represented
|
|
|
|
by the ``relates_to`` key. This differs from the ``updates`` key as they *do
|
|
|
|
not update the event itself*, and are *not required* in order to display the
|
|
|
|
parent event. Crucially, the child events can be paginated, whereas ``updates``
|
|
|
|
child events cannot be paginated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Bundling
|
|
|
|
++++++++
|
|
|
|
Child events can be optionally bundled with the parent event, depending on your
|
|
|
|
display mechanism. The number of child events which can be bundled should be
|
|
|
|
limited to prevent events becoming too large. This limit should be set by the
|
|
|
|
client. If the limit is exceeded, then the bundle should also include a
|
|
|
|
pagination token so that the client can request more child events.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Main use cases for ``relates_to``:
|
|
|
|
- Comments on a message.
|
|
|
|
- Non-local delivery/read receipts : If doing separate receipt events for each
|
|
|
|
message.
|
|
|
|
- Meeting invite responses : Yes/No/Maybe for a meeting.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Like with ``updates``, clients need to know how to apply the deltas because
|
|
|
|
clients may receive the events separately down the event stream.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
TODO:
|
|
|
|
- Can a child event reply to multiple parent events? Use case?
|
|
|
|
- Should a parent event and its children share a thread ID? Does the
|
|
|
|
originating HS set this ID? Is this thread ID exposed through federation?
|
|
|
|
e.g. can a HS retrieve all events for a given thread ID from another HS?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example using 'updates' and 'relates_to'
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
- Room with a single message.
|
|
|
|
- 10 comments are added to the message via ``relates_to``.
|
|
|
|
- An edit is made to the original message via ``updates``.
|
|
|
|
- An initial sync on this room with a limit of 3 comments, would return the
|
|
|
|
message with the update event bundled with it and the most recent 3 comments
|
|
|
|
and a pagination token to request earlier comments
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code :: javascript
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
content: { body: "I am teh winner!" },
|
|
|
|
updated_by: [
|
|
|
|
{ content: { body: "I am the winner!" }, ... }
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
replies: {
|
|
|
|
start: "some_token",
|
|
|
|
chunk: [
|
|
|
|
{ content: { body: "8th comment" }, ... },
|
|
|
|
{ content: { body: "9th comment" }, ... },
|
|
|
|
{ content: { body: "10th comment" }, ... }
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
...
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Events (breaking changes; event version 2) ``[Draft]``
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- Prefix the event ``type`` to say if it is a state event, message event or
|
|
|
|
ephemeral event. Needed because you can't tell the different between message
|
|
|
|
events and ephemeral ROOM events (e.g. typing).
|
|
|
|
- State keys need additional restrictions in order to increase flexibility on
|
|
|
|
state event permissions. State keys prefixed with an ``_`` have no specific
|
|
|
|
restrictions. 0-length state keys are now represented by just a single ``_``.
|
|
|
|
State keys prefixed with ``@`` can be modified only by the named user ID *OR*
|
|
|
|
the room ops. They can have an optional path suffixed to it. State keys that
|
|
|
|
start with a server name can only be modified by that server name (e.g.
|
|
|
|
``some.server.com/some/path`` can only be modified by ``some.server.com``).
|
|
|
|
- Do we want to specify what restrictions apply to the state key in the event
|
|
|
|
type? This would allow HSes to enforce this, making life easier for clients
|
|
|
|
when dealing with custom event types. E.g. ``_custom.event`` would allow
|
|
|
|
anything in the state key, ``_@custom.event`` would only allow user IDs in
|
|
|
|
the state key, etc.
|
|
|
|
- s/user_id/sender/g given that home servers can send events, not just users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|