16 Commits (d306090e8b5016321b8ddb18a094a06505541cd2)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
JustinWayland	dec9eeb2e5	Remove create_new_password parameter in CLI.build_vault_ids (#82066) ... * Remove unused argument in call to build_vault_ids * Remove obsolete build_vault_ids tests * Change tests to account for argument removal * Remove redundant test	1 year ago
Matt Clay	18e8401edd	Remove Python 2.x compat from unit tests (#82109)	1 year ago
Matt Clay	9f899f9492	Require `from __future__ import annotations` (#81902)	1 year ago
Matt Clay	3a9a23fb1a	Use unittest.mock instead of mock. (#77883) ... This can only be done for controller tests.	3 years ago
Matt Clay	1a5853d794	Remove obsolete units.compat.mock compat layer. (#77118) ... * Remove obsolete units.compat.mock compat layer. * Update remaining units.compat.mock references.	3 years ago
Abhijeet Kasurde	3fe48ecba2	Add collection path in CLI version info (#68633) ... This will provide user default path of collection Signed-off-by: Abhijeet Kasurde <akasurde@redhat.com>	4 years ago
Mads Jensen	0f491c0289	Replace TestCase.assertEquals with TestCase.assertEqual.	5 years ago
Toshio Kuratomi	7e92ff823e	Split up the base_parser function ... The goal of breaking apart the base_parser() function is to get rid of a bunch of conditionals and parameters in the code and, instead, make code look like simple composition. When splitting, a choice had to be made as to whether this would operate by side effect (modifying a passed in parser) or side effect-free (returning a new parser everytime). Making a version that's side-effect-free appears to be fighting with the optparse API (it wants to work by creating a parser object, configuring the object, and then parsing the arguments with it) so instead, make it clear that our helper functions are modifying the passed in parser by (1) not returning the parser and (2) changing the function names to be more clear that it is operating by side-effect. Also move all of the generic optparse code, along with the argument context classes, into a new subdirectory.	6 years ago
Matt Clay	3033fd96b0	Move unit test compat code out of `lib/ansible/`. (#46996) ... * Move ansible.compat.tests to test/units/compat/. * Fix unit test references to ansible.compat.tests. * Move builtins compat to separate file. * Fix classification of test/units/compat/ dir.	6 years ago
Adrian Likins	86dc3c09ac	Fix vault --ask-vault-pass with no tty (#31493) ... * Fix vault --ask-vault-pass with no tty 2.4.0 added a check for isatty() that would skip setting up interactive vault password prompts if not running on a tty. But... getpass.getpass() will fallback to reading from stdin if it gets that far without a tty. Since 2.4.0 skipped the interactive prompts / getpass.getpass() in that case, it would never get a chance to fall back to stdin. So if 'echo $VAULT_PASSWORD| ansible-playbook --ask-vault-pass site.yml' was ran without a tty (ie, from a jenkins job or via the vagrant ansible provisioner) the 2.4 behavior was different than 2.3. 2.4 would never read the password from stdin, resulting in a vault password error like: ERROR! Attempting to decrypt but no vault secrets found Fix is just to always call the interactive password prompts based on getpass.getpass() on --ask-vault-pass or --vault-id @prompt and let getpass sort it out. * up test_prompt_no_tty to expect prompt with no tty We do call the PromptSecret class if there is no tty, but we are back to expecting it to read from stdin in that case. * Fix logic for when to auto-prompt vault pass If --ask-vault-pass is used, then pretty much always prompt. If it is not used, then prompt if there are no other vault ids provided and 'auto_prompt==True'. Fixes vagrant bug https://github.com/hashicorp/vagrant/issues/9033 Fixes #30993	7 years ago
Adrian Likins	307be59092	Don't ask for password confirm on 'ansible-vault edit' (#30514) ... * Don't ask for password confirm on 'ansible-vault edit' This is to match the 2.3 behavior on: ansible-vault edit encrypted_file.yml Previously, the above command would consider that a 'new password' scenario and prompt accordingly, ie: $ ansible-vault edit encrypted_file.yml New Password: Confirm New Password: The bug was cause by 'create_new_password' being used for 'edit' action. This also causes the previous implicit 'auto prompt' to get triggered and prompt the user. Fix is to make auto prompt explicit in the calling code to handle the 'edit' case where we want to auto prompt but we do not want to request a password confirm. Fixes #30491	7 years ago
Adrian Likins	8003437ebc	prompt for new pass on create/encrypt if none specified (#28185) ... * prompt for new pass on create/encrypt if none specified Make 'ansible-vault' edit or encrypt prompt for a password if none or provided elsewhere. Note: ansible-playbook does not prompt if not vault password is provided * dont show vault password prompts if not a tty	7 years ago
Adrian Likins	5739bb075f	Vault secrets default vault ids list (#28190) ... * Add config option for a default list of vault-ids This is the vault-id equilivent of ANSIBLE_DEFAULT_PASSWORD_FILE except ANSIBLE_DEFAULT_VAULT_IDENTITY_LIST is a list.	7 years ago
Adrian Likins	82f550e8cd	Add prompt formats for 2.3 compat ask-vault-pass (#27974) ... The prompt_formats dict didn't get the 'prompt_ask_vault_pass' item added for interactive --ask-vault-pass, which caused "KeyError: u'prompt_ask_vault_pass'" Fixes #27885	7 years ago
Adrian Likins	934b645191	Support multiple vault passwords (#22756) ... Fixes #13243 ** Add --vault-id to name/identify multiple vault passwords Use --vault-id to indicate id and path/type --vault-id=prompt # prompt for default vault id password --vault-id=myorg@prompt # prompt for a vault_id named 'myorg' --vault-id=a_password_file # load ./a_password_file for default id --vault-id=myorg@a_password_file # load file for 'myorg' vault id vault_id's are created implicitly for existing --vault-password-file and --ask-vault-pass options. Vault ids are just for UX purposes and bookkeeping. Only the vault payload and the password bytestring is needed to decrypt a vault blob. Replace passing password around everywhere with a VaultSecrets object. If we specify a vault_id, mention that in password prompts Specifying multiple -vault-password-files will now try each until one works ** Rev vault format in a backwards compatible way The 1.2 vault format adds the vault_id to the header line of the vault text. This is backwards compatible with older versions of ansible. Old versions will just ignore it and treat it as the default (and only) vault id. Note: only 2.4+ supports multiple vault passwords, so while earlier ansible versions can read the vault-1.2 format, it does not make them magically support multiple vault passwords. use 1.1 format for 'default' vault_id Vaulted items that need to include a vault_id will be written in 1.2 format. If we set a new DEFAULT_VAULT_IDENTITY, then the default will use version 1.2 vault will only use a vault_id if one is specified. So if none is specified and C.DEFAULT_VAULT_IDENTITY is 'default' we use the old format. ** Changes/refactors needed to implement multiple vault passwords raise exceptions on decrypt fail, check vault id early split out parsing the vault plaintext envelope (with the sha/original plaintext) to _split_plaintext_envelope() some cli fixups for specifying multiple paths in the unfrack_paths optparse callback fix py3 dict.keys() 'dict_keys object is not indexable' error pluralize cli.options.vault_password_file -> vault_password_files pluralize cli.options.new_vault_password_file -> new_vault_password_files pluralize cli.options.vault_id -> cli.options.vault_ids ** Add a config option (vault_id_match) to force vault id matching. With 'vault_id_match=True' and an ansible vault that provides a vault_id, then decryption will require that a matching vault_id is required. (via --vault-id=my_vault_id@password_file, for ex). In other words, if the config option is true, then only the vault secrets with matching vault ids are candidates for decrypting a vault. If option is false (the default), then all of the provided vault secrets will be selected. If a user doesn't want all vault secrets to be tried to decrypt any vault content, they can enable this option. Note: The vault id used for the match is not encrypted or cryptographically signed. It is just a label/id/nickname used for referencing a specific vault secret.	7 years ago
Adrian Likins	694c57de2e	add python version info to --version (#22089) ... * add python info to ansible --version * Add unit tests for cli.CLI.version	8 years ago