Bugfix: if you define __eq__, you should define __ne__ too

pull/12502/head
Marius Gedminas 9 years ago
parent 5d29a2eabd
commit a2bc6b4b26

@ -38,6 +38,9 @@ class Host:
def __eq__(self, other): def __eq__(self, other):
return self.name == other.name return self.name == other.name
def __ne__(self, other):
return not self.__eq__(other)
def serialize(self): def serialize(self):
groups = [] groups = []
for group in self.groups: for group in self.groups:

@ -0,0 +1,35 @@
# Copyright 2015 Marius Gedminas <marius@gedmin.as>
#
# This file is part of Ansible
#
# Ansible is free software: you can redistribute it and/or modify
# it under the terms of the GNU General Public License as published by
# the Free Software Foundation, either version 3 of the License, or
# (at your option) any later version.
#
# Ansible is distributed in the hope that it will be useful,
# but WITHOUT ANY WARRANTY; without even the implied warranty of
# MERCHANTABILITY or FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE. See the
# GNU General Public License for more details.
#
# You should have received a copy of the GNU General Public License
# along with Ansible. If not, see <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/>.
import unittest
from ansible.inventory.host import Host
class TestHost(unittest.TestCase):
def setUp(self):
self.hostA = Host('a')
self.hostB = Host('b')
def test_equality(self):
self.assertEqual(self.hostA, self.hostA)
self.assertNotEqual(self.hostA, self.hostB)
self.assertEqual(self.hostA, Host('a'))
# __ne__ is a separate method
self.assertFalse(self.hostA != Host('a'))
Loading…
Cancel
Save