You cannot select more than 25 topics Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
tailscale/derp
Will Norris 3ec5be3f51 all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it
This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in
the history of Tailscale's open source releases.

A Brief History of AUTHORS files
---

The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for
Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem
was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing
Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source
projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each
contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors
then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE
file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a
tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the
license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact.

The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the
copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then
include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The
Chromium Authors".

This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a
high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the
copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the
contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way
for the proejct maintainer to know.

Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to
keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to
it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors.
They are also clear that:

> Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the
> project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership.

It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors
that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was
entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even
the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright
holders.

In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists
Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes
confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header
in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so
it's ambiguous what that means.

Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever
they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We
also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which
provides some additional certification of their right to make the
contribution.

The source file changes were purely mechanical with:

    git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g'

Updates #cleanup

Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d
Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
2 days ago
..
derpconst all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it 2 days ago
derphttp all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it 2 days ago
derpserver all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it 2 days ago
xdp all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it 2 days ago
README.md derp: add a README.md with some docs 3 years ago
client_test.go all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it 2 days ago
derp.go all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it 2 days ago
derp_client.go all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it 2 days ago
derp_test.go all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it 2 days ago
export_test.go all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it 2 days ago

README.md

DERP

This directory (and subdirectories) contain the DERP code. The server itself is in ../cmd/derper.

DERP is a packet relay system (client and servers) where peers are addressed using WireGuard public keys instead of IP addresses.

It relays two types of packets:

  • "Disco" discovery messages (see ../disco) as the a side channel during NAT traversal.

  • Encrypted WireGuard packets as the fallback of last resort when UDP is blocked or NAT traversal fails.

DERP Map

Each client receives a "DERP Map" from the coordination server describing the DERP servers the client should try to use.

The client picks its home "DERP home" based on latency. This is done to keep costs low by avoid using cloud load balancers (pricey) or anycast, which would necessarily require server-side routing between DERP regions.

Clients pick their DERP home and report it to the coordination server which shares it to all the peers in the tailnet. When a peer wants to send a packet and it doesn't already have a WireGuard session open, it sends disco messages (some direct, and some over DERP), trying to do the NAT traversal. The client will make connections to multiple DERP regions as needed. Only the DERP home region connection needs to be alive forever.

DERP Regions

Tailscale runs 1 or more DERP nodes (instances of cmd/derper) in various geographic regions to make sure users have low latency to their DERP home.

Regions generally have multiple nodes per region "meshed" (routing to each other) together for redundancy: it allows for cloud failures or upgrades without kicking users out to a higher latency region. Instead, clients will reconnect to the next node in the region. Each node in the region is required to to be meshed with every other node in the region and forward packets to the other nodes in the region. Packets are forwarded only one hop within the region. There is no routing between regions. The assumption is that the mesh TCP connections are over a VPC that's very fast, low latency, and not charged per byte. The coordination server assigns the list of nodes in a region as a function of the tailnet, so all nodes within a tailnet should generally be on the same node and not require forwarding. Only after a failure do clients of a particular tailnet get split between nodes in a region and require inter-node forwarding. But over time it balances back out. There's also an admin-only DERP frame type to force close the TCP connection of a particular client to force them to reconnect to their primary if the operator wants to force things to balance out sooner. (Using the (*derphttp.Client).ClosePeer method, as used by Tailscale's internal rarely-used cmd/derpprune maintenance tool)

We generally run a minimum of three nodes in a region not for quorum reasons (there's no voting) but just because two is too uncomfortably few for cascading failure reasons: if you're running two nodes at 51% load (CPU, memory, etc) and then one fails, that makes the second one fail. With three or more nodes, you can run each node a bit hotter.