Commit Graph

10 Commits (94fa6d97c5a25269e9c68595d5fabfd847f9f7b4)

Author SHA1 Message Date
Will Norris 71029cea2d all: update copyright and license headers
This updates all source files to use a new standard header for copyright
and license declaration.  Notably, copyright no longer includes a date,
and we now use the standard SPDX-License-Identifier header.

This commit was done almost entirely mechanically with perl, and then
some minimal manual fixes.

Updates #6865

Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>
2 years ago
Brad Fitzpatrick 7eaf5e509f net/netaddr: start migrating to net/netip via new netaddr adapter package
Updates #5162

Change-Id: Id7bdec303b25471f69d542f8ce43805328d56c12
Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
2 years ago
David Anderson 97693f2e42 wgengine/magicsock: delete legacy AddrSet endpoints.
Instead of using the legacy codepath, teach discoEndpoint to handle
peers that have a home DERP, but no disco key. We can still communicate
with them, but only over DERP.

Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
3 years ago
David Anderson 61c62f48d9 wgengine/bench: disable unused benchmark that relies on legacy magicsock.
Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
3 years ago
Josh Bleecher Snyder 25df067dd0 all: adapt to opaque netaddr types
This commit is a mishmash of automated edits using gofmt:

gofmt -r 'netaddr.IPPort{IP: a, Port: b} -> netaddr.IPPortFrom(a, b)' -w .
gofmt -r 'netaddr.IPPrefix{IP: a, Port: b} -> netaddr.IPPrefixFrom(a, b)' -w .

gofmt -r 'a.IP.Is4 -> a.IP().Is4' -w .
gofmt -r 'a.IP.As16 -> a.IP().As16' -w .
gofmt -r 'a.IP.Is6 -> a.IP().Is6' -w .
gofmt -r 'a.IP.As4 -> a.IP().As4' -w .
gofmt -r 'a.IP.String -> a.IP().String' -w .

And regexps:

\w*(.*)\.Port = (.*)  ->  $1 = $1.WithPort($2)
\w*(.*)\.IP = (.*)  ->  $1 = $1.WithIP($2)

And lots of manual fixups.

Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
4 years ago
Josh Bleecher Snyder 773fcfd007 Revert "wgengine/bench: skip flaky test"
This reverts commit d707e2f7e5.

Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
4 years ago
Brad Fitzpatrick d707e2f7e5 wgengine/bench: skip flaky test
Updates tailscale/corp#1776

Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>
4 years ago
Josh Bleecher Snyder 6618e82ba2 wgengine/bench: close Engines on benchmark completion
This reduces the speed with which these benchmarks exhaust their supply fds.
Not to zero unfortunately, but it's still helpful when doing long runs.

Signed-off-by: Josh Bleecher Snyder <josh@tailscale.com>
4 years ago
Avery Pennarun a7fe1d7c46 wgengine/bench: improved rate selection.
The old decay-based one took a while to converge. This new one (based
very loosely on TCP BBR) seems to converge quickly on what seems to be
the best speed.

Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
4 years ago
Avery Pennarun a92b9647c5 wgengine/bench: speed test for channels, sockets, and wireguard-go.
This tries to generate traffic at a rate that will saturate the
receiver, without overdoing it, even in the event of packet loss. It's
unrealistically more aggressive than TCP (which will back off quickly
in case of packet loss) but less silly than a blind test that just
generates packets as fast as it can (which can cause all the CPU to be
absorbed by the transmitter, giving an incorrect impression of how much
capacity the total system has).

Initial indications are that a syscall about every 10 packets (TCP bulk
delivery) is roughly the same speed as sending every packet through a
channel. A syscall per packet is about 5x-10x slower than that.

The whole tailscale wireguard-go + magicsock + packet filter
combination is about 4x slower again, which is better than I thought
we'd do, but probably has room for improvement.

Note that in "full" tailscale, there is also a tundev read/write for
every packet, effectively doubling the syscall overhead per packet.

Given these numbers, it seems like read/write syscalls are only 25-40%
of the total CPU time used in tailscale proper, so we do have
significant non-syscall optimization work to do too.

Sample output:

$ GOMAXPROCS=2 go test -bench . -benchtime 5s ./cmd/tailbench
goos: linux
goarch: amd64
pkg: tailscale.com/cmd/tailbench
cpu: Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-4785T CPU @ 2.20GHz
BenchmarkTrivialNoAlloc/32-2         	56340248	        93.85 ns/op	 340.98 MB/s	         0 %lost	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTrivialNoAlloc/124-2        	57527490	        99.27 ns/op	1249.10 MB/s	         0 %lost	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTrivialNoAlloc/1024-2       	52537773	       111.3 ns/op	9200.39 MB/s	         0 %lost	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTrivial/32-2                	41878063	       135.6 ns/op	 236.04 MB/s	         0 %lost	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTrivial/124-2               	41270439	       138.4 ns/op	 896.02 MB/s	         0 %lost	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTrivial/1024-2              	36337252	       154.3 ns/op	6635.30 MB/s	         0 %lost	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkBlockingChannel/32-2           12171654	       494.3 ns/op	  64.74 MB/s	         0 %lost	    1791 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkBlockingChannel/124-2          12149956	       507.8 ns/op	 244.17 MB/s	         0 %lost	    1792 B/op	       1 allocs/op
BenchmarkBlockingChannel/1024-2         11034754	       528.8 ns/op	1936.42 MB/s	         0 %lost	    1792 B/op	       1 allocs/op
BenchmarkNonlockingChannel/32-2          8960622	      2195 ns/op	  14.58 MB/s	         8.825 %lost	    1792 B/op	       1 allocs/op
BenchmarkNonlockingChannel/124-2         3014614	      2224 ns/op	  55.75 MB/s	        11.18 %lost	    1792 B/op	       1 allocs/op
BenchmarkNonlockingChannel/1024-2        3234915	      1688 ns/op	 606.53 MB/s	         3.765 %lost	    1792 B/op	       1 allocs/op
BenchmarkDoubleChannel/32-2          	 8457559	       764.1 ns/op	  41.88 MB/s	         5.945 %lost	    1792 B/op	       1 allocs/op
BenchmarkDoubleChannel/124-2         	 5497726	      1030 ns/op	 120.38 MB/s	        12.14 %lost	    1792 B/op	       1 allocs/op
BenchmarkDoubleChannel/1024-2        	 7985656	      1360 ns/op	 752.86 MB/s	        13.57 %lost	    1792 B/op	       1 allocs/op
BenchmarkUDP/32-2                    	 1652134	      3695 ns/op	   8.66 MB/s	         0 %lost	     176 B/op	       3 allocs/op
BenchmarkUDP/124-2                   	 1621024	      3765 ns/op	  32.94 MB/s	         0 %lost	     176 B/op	       3 allocs/op
BenchmarkUDP/1024-2                  	 1553750	      3825 ns/op	 267.72 MB/s	         0 %lost	     176 B/op	       3 allocs/op
BenchmarkTCP/32-2                    	11056336	       503.2 ns/op	  63.60 MB/s	         0 %lost	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTCP/124-2                   	11074869	       533.7 ns/op	 232.32 MB/s	         0 %lost	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkTCP/1024-2                  	 8934968	       671.4 ns/op	1525.20 MB/s	         0 %lost	       0 B/op	       0 allocs/op
BenchmarkWireGuardTest/32-2          	 1403702	      4547 ns/op	   7.04 MB/s	        14.37 %lost	     467 B/op	       3 allocs/op
BenchmarkWireGuardTest/124-2         	  780645	      7927 ns/op	  15.64 MB/s	         1.537 %lost	     420 B/op	       3 allocs/op
BenchmarkWireGuardTest/1024-2        	  512671	     11791 ns/op	  86.85 MB/s	         0.5206 %lost	     411 B/op	       3 allocs/op
PASS
ok  	tailscale.com/wgengine/bench	195.724s

Updates #414.

Signed-off-by: Avery Pennarun <apenwarr@tailscale.com>
4 years ago