3 Commits (2a69f48541e0ed7fdf81fc88b079474331eeee76)

Author	SHA1	Message	Date
Will Norris	3ec5be3f51	all: remove AUTHORS file and references to it ... This file was never truly necessary and has never actually been used in the history of Tailscale's open source releases. A Brief History of AUTHORS files --- The AUTHORS file was a pattern developed at Google, originally for Chromium, then adopted by Go and a bunch of other projects. The problem was that Chromium originally had a copyright line only recognizing Google as the copyright holder. Because Google (and most open source projects) do not require copyright assignemnt for contributions, each contributor maintains their copyright. Some large corporate contributors then tried to add their own name to the copyright line in the LICENSE file or in file headers. This quickly becomes unwieldy, and puts a tremendous burden on anyone building on top of Chromium, since the license requires that they keep all copyright lines intact. The compromise was to create an AUTHORS file that would list all of the copyright holders. The LICENSE file and source file headers would then include that list by reference, listing the copyright holder as "The Chromium Authors". This also become cumbersome to simply keep the file up to date with a high rate of new contributors. Plus it's not always obvious who the copyright holder is. Sometimes it is the individual making the contribution, but many times it may be their employer. There is no way for the proejct maintainer to know. Eventually, Google changed their policy to no longer recommend trying to keep the AUTHORS file up to date proactively, and instead to only add to it when requested: https://opensource.google/docs/releasing/authors. They are also clear that: > Adding contributors to the AUTHORS file is entirely within the > project's discretion and has no implications for copyright ownership. It was primarily added to appease a small number of large contributors that insisted that they be recognized as copyright holders (which was entirely their right to do). But it's not truly necessary, and not even the most accurate way of identifying contributors and/or copyright holders. In practice, we've never added anyone to our AUTHORS file. It only lists Tailscale, so it's not really serving any purpose. It also causes confusion because Tailscalars put the "Tailscale Inc & AUTHORS" header in other open source repos which don't actually have an AUTHORS file, so it's ambiguous what that means. Instead, we just acknowledge that the contributors to Tailscale (whoever they are) are copyright holders for their individual contributions. We also have the benefit of using the DCO (developercertificate.org) which provides some additional certification of their right to make the contribution. The source file changes were purely mechanical with: git ls-files | xargs sed -i -e 's/\(Tailscale Inc &\) AUTHORS/\1 contributors/g' Updates #cleanup Change-Id: Ia101a4a3005adb9118051b3416f5a64a4a45987d Signed-off-by: Will Norris <will@tailscale.com>	3 days ago
Brad Fitzpatrick	fb96137d79	net/{netx,memnet},all: add netx.DialFunc, move memnet Network impl ... This adds netx.DialFunc, unifying a type we have a bazillion other places, giving it now a nice short name that's clickable in editors, etc. That highlighted that my earlier move (03b47a55c7) of stuff from nettest into netx moved too much: it also dragged along the memnet impl, meaning all users of netx.DialFunc who just wanted netx for the type definition were instead also pulling in all of memnet. So move the memnet implementation netx.Network into memnet, a package we already had. Then use netx.DialFunc in a bunch of places. I'm sure I missed some. And plenty remain in other repos, to be updated later. Updates tailscale/corp#27636 Change-Id: I7296cd4591218e8624e214f8c70dab05fb884e95 Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>	10 months ago
Brad Fitzpatrick	03b47a55c7	tstest/nettest: pull the non-test Network abstraction out to netx package ... We want to be able to use the netx.Network (and RealNetwork implemementation) outside of tests, without linking "testing". So split out the non-test stuff of nettest into its own package. We tend to use "foox" as the convention for things we wish were in the standard library's foo package, so "netx" seems consistent. Updates tailscale/corp#27636 Change-Id: I1911d361f4fbdf189837bf629a20f2ebfa863c44 Signed-off-by: Brad Fitzpatrick <bradfitz@tailscale.com>	10 months ago