net/art: add more exhaustive table testing

Updates #7781

Signed-off-by: David Anderson <danderson@tailscale.com>
pull/8701/head
David Anderson 1 year ago committed by Dave Anderson
parent 9cc3f7a3d6
commit b145a22f55

@ -16,7 +16,571 @@ import (
"tailscale.com/types/ptr"
)
func TestRegression(t *testing.T) {
// These tests are specific triggers for subtle correctness issues
// that came up during initial implementation. Even if they seem
// arbitrary, please do not clean them up. They are checking edge
// cases that are very easy to get wrong, and quite difficult for
// the other statistical tests to trigger promptly.
t.Run("prefixes_aligned_on_stride_boundary", func(t *testing.T) {
// Regression test for computePrefixSplit called with equal
// arguments.
tbl := &Table[int]{}
slow := slowPrefixTable[int]{}
p := netip.MustParsePrefix
v := ptr.To(1)
tbl.Insert(p("226.205.197.0/24"), v)
slow.insert(p("226.205.197.0/24"), v)
v = ptr.To(2)
tbl.Insert(p("226.205.0.0/16"), v)
slow.insert(p("226.205.0.0/16"), v)
probe := netip.MustParseAddr("226.205.121.152")
got, want := tbl.Get(probe), slow.get(probe)
if got != want {
t.Fatalf("got %v, want %v", got, want)
}
})
t.Run("parent_prefix_inserted_in_different_orders", func(t *testing.T) {
// Regression test for the off-by-one correction applied
// within computePrefixSplit.
t1, t2 := &Table[int]{}, &Table[int]{}
p := netip.MustParsePrefix
v1, v2 := ptr.To(1), ptr.To(2)
t1.Insert(p("136.20.0.0/16"), v1)
t1.Insert(p("136.20.201.62/32"), v2)
t2.Insert(p("136.20.201.62/32"), v2)
t2.Insert(p("136.20.0.0/16"), v1)
a := netip.MustParseAddr("136.20.54.139")
got, want := t2.Get(a), t1.Get(a)
if got != want {
t.Errorf("Get(%q) is insertion order dependent (t1=%v, t2=%v)", a, want, got)
}
})
}
func TestComputePrefixSplit(t *testing.T) {
// These tests are partially redundant with other tests. Please
// keep them anyway. computePrefixSplit's behavior is remarkably
// subtle, and all the test cases listed below come from
// hard-earned debugging of malformed route tables.
var tests = []struct {
// prefixA can be a /8, /16 or /24 (v4).
// prefixB can be anything /9 or more specific.
prefixA, prefixB string
lastCommon string
aStride, bStride uint8
}{
{"192.168.1.0/24", "192.168.5.5/32", "192.168.0.0/16", 1, 5},
{"192.168.129.0/24", "192.168.128.0/17", "192.168.0.0/16", 129, 128},
{"192.168.5.0/24", "192.168.0.0/16", "192.0.0.0/8", 168, 168},
{"192.168.0.0/16", "192.168.0.0/16", "192.0.0.0/8", 168, 168},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa::1/128", "ff:aaaa::/120", "ff:aaaa::/32", 170, 0},
}
for _, test := range tests {
a, b := netip.MustParsePrefix(test.prefixA), netip.MustParsePrefix(test.prefixB)
gotLastCommon, gotAStride, gotBStride := computePrefixSplit(a, b)
if want := netip.MustParsePrefix(test.lastCommon); gotLastCommon != want || gotAStride != test.aStride || gotBStride != test.bStride {
t.Errorf("computePrefixSplit(%q, %q) = %s, %d, %d; want %s, %d, %d", a, b, gotLastCommon, gotAStride, gotBStride, want, test.aStride, test.bStride)
}
}
}
func TestInsert(t *testing.T) {
tbl := &Table[int]{}
p := netip.MustParsePrefix
// Create a new leaf strideTable, with compressed path
tbl.Insert(p("192.168.0.1/32"), ptr.To(1))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.168.0.2", -1},
{"192.168.0.3", -1},
{"192.168.0.255", -1},
{"192.168.1.1", -1},
{"192.170.1.1", -1},
{"192.180.0.1", -1},
{"192.180.3.5", -1},
{"10.0.0.5", -1},
{"10.0.0.15", -1},
})
// Insert into previous leaf, no tree changes
tbl.Insert(p("192.168.0.2/32"), ptr.To(2))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.168.0.2", 2},
{"192.168.0.3", -1},
{"192.168.0.255", -1},
{"192.168.1.1", -1},
{"192.170.1.1", -1},
{"192.180.0.1", -1},
{"192.180.3.5", -1},
{"10.0.0.5", -1},
{"10.0.0.15", -1},
})
// Insert into previous leaf, unaligned prefix covering the /32s
tbl.Insert(p("192.168.0.0/26"), ptr.To(7))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.168.0.2", 2},
{"192.168.0.3", 7},
{"192.168.0.255", -1},
{"192.168.1.1", -1},
{"192.170.1.1", -1},
{"192.180.0.1", -1},
{"192.180.3.5", -1},
{"10.0.0.5", -1},
{"10.0.0.15", -1},
})
// Create a different leaf elsewhere
tbl.Insert(p("10.0.0.0/27"), ptr.To(3))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.168.0.2", 2},
{"192.168.0.3", 7},
{"192.168.0.255", -1},
{"192.168.1.1", -1},
{"192.170.1.1", -1},
{"192.180.0.1", -1},
{"192.180.3.5", -1},
{"10.0.0.5", 3},
{"10.0.0.15", 3},
})
// Insert that creates a new intermediate table and a new child
tbl.Insert(p("192.168.1.1/32"), ptr.To(4))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.168.0.2", 2},
{"192.168.0.3", 7},
{"192.168.0.255", -1},
{"192.168.1.1", 4},
{"192.170.1.1", -1},
{"192.180.0.1", -1},
{"192.180.3.5", -1},
{"10.0.0.5", 3},
{"10.0.0.15", 3},
})
// Insert that creates a new intermediate table but no new child
tbl.Insert(p("192.170.0.0/16"), ptr.To(5))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.168.0.2", 2},
{"192.168.0.3", 7},
{"192.168.0.255", -1},
{"192.168.1.1", 4},
{"192.170.1.1", 5},
{"192.180.0.1", -1},
{"192.180.3.5", -1},
{"10.0.0.5", 3},
{"10.0.0.15", 3},
})
// New leaf in a different subtree, so the next insert can test a
// variant of decompression.
tbl.Insert(p("192.180.0.1/32"), ptr.To(8))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.168.0.2", 2},
{"192.168.0.3", 7},
{"192.168.0.255", -1},
{"192.168.1.1", 4},
{"192.170.1.1", 5},
{"192.180.0.1", 8},
{"192.180.3.5", -1},
{"10.0.0.5", 3},
{"10.0.0.15", 3},
})
// Insert that creates a new intermediate table but no new child,
// with an unaligned intermediate
tbl.Insert(p("192.180.0.0/21"), ptr.To(9))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.168.0.2", 2},
{"192.168.0.3", 7},
{"192.168.0.255", -1},
{"192.168.1.1", 4},
{"192.170.1.1", 5},
{"192.180.0.1", 8},
{"192.180.3.5", 9},
{"10.0.0.5", 3},
{"10.0.0.15", 3},
})
// Insert a default route, those have their own codepath.
tbl.Insert(p("0.0.0.0/0"), ptr.To(6))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.168.0.2", 2},
{"192.168.0.3", 7},
{"192.168.0.255", 6},
{"192.168.1.1", 4},
{"192.170.1.1", 5},
{"192.180.0.1", 8},
{"192.180.3.5", 9},
{"10.0.0.5", 3},
{"10.0.0.15", 3},
})
// Now all of the above again, but for IPv6.
// Create a new leaf strideTable, with compressed path
tbl.Insert(p("ff:aaaa::1/128"), ptr.To(1))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"ff:aaaa::1", 1},
{"ff:aaaa::2", -1},
{"ff:aaaa::3", -1},
{"ff:aaaa::255", -1},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa::1", -1},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa:bbbb::1", -1},
{"ff:cccc::1", -1},
{"ff:cccc::ff", -1},
{"ffff:bbbb::5", -1},
{"ffff:bbbb::15", -1},
})
// Insert into previous leaf, no tree changes
tbl.Insert(p("ff:aaaa::2/128"), ptr.To(2))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"ff:aaaa::1", 1},
{"ff:aaaa::2", 2},
{"ff:aaaa::3", -1},
{"ff:aaaa::255", -1},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa::1", -1},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa:bbbb::1", -1},
{"ff:cccc::1", -1},
{"ff:cccc::ff", -1},
{"ffff:bbbb::5", -1},
{"ffff:bbbb::15", -1},
})
// Insert into previous leaf, unaligned prefix covering the /128s
tbl.Insert(p("ff:aaaa::/125"), ptr.To(7))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"ff:aaaa::1", 1},
{"ff:aaaa::2", 2},
{"ff:aaaa::3", 7},
{"ff:aaaa::255", -1},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa::1", -1},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa:bbbb::1", -1},
{"ff:cccc::1", -1},
{"ff:cccc::ff", -1},
{"ffff:bbbb::5", -1},
{"ffff:bbbb::15", -1},
})
// Create a different leaf elsewhere
tbl.Insert(p("ffff:bbbb::/120"), ptr.To(3))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"ff:aaaa::1", 1},
{"ff:aaaa::2", 2},
{"ff:aaaa::3", 7},
{"ff:aaaa::255", -1},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa::1", -1},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa:bbbb::1", -1},
{"ff:cccc::1", -1},
{"ff:cccc::ff", -1},
{"ffff:bbbb::5", 3},
{"ffff:bbbb::15", 3},
})
// Insert that creates a new intermediate table and a new child
tbl.Insert(p("ff:aaaa:aaaa::1/128"), ptr.To(4))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"ff:aaaa::1", 1},
{"ff:aaaa::2", 2},
{"ff:aaaa::3", 7},
{"ff:aaaa::255", -1},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa::1", 4},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa:bbbb::1", -1},
{"ff:cccc::1", -1},
{"ff:cccc::ff", -1},
{"ffff:bbbb::5", 3},
{"ffff:bbbb::15", 3},
})
// Insert that creates a new intermediate table but no new child
tbl.Insert(p("ff:aaaa:aaaa:bb00::/56"), ptr.To(5))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"ff:aaaa::1", 1},
{"ff:aaaa::2", 2},
{"ff:aaaa::3", 7},
{"ff:aaaa::255", -1},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa::1", 4},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa:bbbb::1", 5},
{"ff:cccc::1", -1},
{"ff:cccc::ff", -1},
{"ffff:bbbb::5", 3},
{"ffff:bbbb::15", 3},
})
// New leaf in a different subtree, so the next insert can test a
// variant of decompression.
tbl.Insert(p("ff:cccc::1/128"), ptr.To(8))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"ff:aaaa::1", 1},
{"ff:aaaa::2", 2},
{"ff:aaaa::3", 7},
{"ff:aaaa::255", -1},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa::1", 4},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa:bbbb::1", 5},
{"ff:cccc::1", 8},
{"ff:cccc::ff", -1},
{"ffff:bbbb::5", 3},
{"ffff:bbbb::15", 3},
})
// Insert that creates a new intermediate table but no new child,
// with an unaligned intermediate
tbl.Insert(p("ff:cccc::/37"), ptr.To(9))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"ff:aaaa::1", 1},
{"ff:aaaa::2", 2},
{"ff:aaaa::3", 7},
{"ff:aaaa::255", -1},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa::1", 4},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa:bbbb::1", 5},
{"ff:cccc::1", 8},
{"ff:cccc::ff", 9},
{"ffff:bbbb::5", 3},
{"ffff:bbbb::15", 3},
})
// Insert a default route, those have their own codepath.
tbl.Insert(p("::/0"), ptr.To(6))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"ff:aaaa::1", 1},
{"ff:aaaa::2", 2},
{"ff:aaaa::3", 7},
{"ff:aaaa::255", 6},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa::1", 4},
{"ff:aaaa:aaaa:bbbb::1", 5},
{"ff:cccc::1", 8},
{"ff:cccc::ff", 9},
{"ffff:bbbb::5", 3},
{"ffff:bbbb::15", 3},
})
}
func TestDelete(t *testing.T) {
t.Parallel()
p := netip.MustParsePrefix
t.Run("prefix_in_root", func(t *testing.T) {
// Add/remove prefix from root table.
tbl := &Table[int]{}
checkSize(t, tbl, 2)
tbl.Insert(p("10.0.0.0/8"), ptr.To(1))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"10.0.0.1", 1},
{"255.255.255.255", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 2)
tbl.Delete(p("10.0.0.0/8"))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"10.0.0.1", -1},
{"255.255.255.255", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 2)
})
t.Run("prefix_in_leaf", func(t *testing.T) {
// Create, then delete a single leaf table.
tbl := &Table[int]{}
checkSize(t, tbl, 2)
tbl.Insert(p("192.168.0.1/32"), ptr.To(1))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"255.255.255.255", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 3)
tbl.Delete(p("192.168.0.1/32"))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", -1},
{"255.255.255.255", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 2)
})
t.Run("intermediate_no_routes", func(t *testing.T) {
// Create an intermediate with 2 children, then delete one leaf.
tbl := &Table[int]{}
checkSize(t, tbl, 2)
tbl.Insert(p("192.168.0.1/32"), ptr.To(1))
tbl.Insert(p("192.180.0.1/32"), ptr.To(2))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.180.0.1", 2},
{"192.40.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 5) // 2 roots, 1 intermediate, 2 leaves
tbl.Delete(p("192.180.0.1/32"))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.180.0.1", -1},
{"192.40.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 3) // 2 roots, 1 leaf
})
t.Run("intermediate_with_route", func(t *testing.T) {
// Same, but the intermediate carries a route as well.
tbl := &Table[int]{}
checkSize(t, tbl, 2)
tbl.Insert(p("192.168.0.1/32"), ptr.To(1))
tbl.Insert(p("192.180.0.1/32"), ptr.To(2))
tbl.Insert(p("192.0.0.0/10"), ptr.To(3))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.180.0.1", 2},
{"192.40.0.1", 3},
{"192.255.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 5) // 2 roots, 1 intermediate, 2 leaves
tbl.Delete(p("192.180.0.1/32"))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.180.0.1", -1},
{"192.40.0.1", 3},
{"192.255.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 4) // 2 roots, 1 intermediate w/route, 1 leaf
})
t.Run("intermediate_many_leaves", func(t *testing.T) {
// Intermediate with 3 leaves, then delete one leaf.
tbl := &Table[int]{}
checkSize(t, tbl, 2)
tbl.Insert(p("192.168.0.1/32"), ptr.To(1))
tbl.Insert(p("192.180.0.1/32"), ptr.To(2))
tbl.Insert(p("192.200.0.1/32"), ptr.To(3))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.180.0.1", 2},
{"192.200.0.1", 3},
{"192.255.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 6) // 2 roots, 1 intermediate, 3 leaves
tbl.Delete(p("192.180.0.1/32"))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.180.0.1", -1},
{"192.200.0.1", 3},
{"192.255.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 5) // 2 roots, 1 intermediate, 2 leaves
})
t.Run("nosuchprefix_missing_child", func(t *testing.T) {
// Delete non-existent prefix, missing strideTable path.
tbl := &Table[int]{}
checkSize(t, tbl, 2)
tbl.Insert(p("192.168.0.1/32"), ptr.To(1))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.255.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 3) // 2 roots, 1 leaf
tbl.Delete(p("200.0.0.0/32")) // lookup miss in root
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.255.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 3) // 2 roots, 1 leaf
})
t.Run("nosuchprefix_wrong_turn", func(t *testing.T) {
// Delete non-existent prefix, strideTable path exists but
// with a wrong turn.
tbl := &Table[int]{}
checkSize(t, tbl, 2)
tbl.Insert(p("192.168.0.1/32"), ptr.To(1))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.255.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 3) // 2 roots, 1 leaf
tbl.Delete(p("192.40.0.0/32")) // finds wrong child
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.255.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 3) // 2 roots, 1 leaf
})
t.Run("nosuchprefix_not_in_leaf", func(t *testing.T) {
// Delete non-existent prefix, strideTable path exists but
// leaf doesn't contain route.
tbl := &Table[int]{}
checkSize(t, tbl, 2)
tbl.Insert(p("192.168.0.1/32"), ptr.To(1))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.255.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 3) // 2 roots, 1 leaf
tbl.Delete(p("192.168.0.5/32")) // right leaf, no route
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.255.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 3) // 2 roots, 1 leaf
})
t.Run("intermediate_with_deleted_route", func(t *testing.T) {
// Intermediate table loses its last route and becomes
// compactable.
tbl := &Table[int]{}
checkSize(t, tbl, 2)
tbl.Insert(p("192.168.0.1/32"), ptr.To(1))
tbl.Insert(p("192.168.0.0/22"), ptr.To(2))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.168.0.2", 2},
{"192.255.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 4) // 2 roots, 1 intermediate w/route, 1 leaf
tbl.Delete(p("192.168.0.0/22"))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"192.168.0.1", 1},
{"192.168.0.2", -1},
{"192.255.0.1", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 3) // 2 roots, 1 leaf
})
t.Run("default_route", func(t *testing.T) {
// Default routes have a special case in the code.
tbl := &Table[int]{}
tbl.Insert(p("0.0.0.0/0"), ptr.To(1))
tbl.Delete(p("0.0.0.0/0"))
checkRoutes(t, tbl, []tableTest{
{"1.2.3.4", -1},
})
checkSize(t, tbl, 2) // 2 roots
})
}
func TestInsertCompare(t *testing.T) {
// Create large route tables repeatedly, and compare Table's
// behavior to a naive and slow but correct implementation.
t.Parallel()
pfxs := randomPrefixes(10_000)
@ -27,7 +591,9 @@ func TestInsert(t *testing.T) {
fast.Insert(pfx.pfx, pfx.val)
}
t.Logf(fast.debugSummary())
if debugInsert {
t.Logf(fast.debugSummary())
}
seenVals4 := map[*int]bool{}
seenVals6 := map[*int]bool{}
@ -44,6 +610,7 @@ func TestInsert(t *testing.T) {
t.Errorf("get(%q) = %p, want %p", a, fastVal, slowVal)
}
}
// Empirically, 10k probes into 5k v4 prefixes and 5k v6 prefixes results in
// ~1k distinct values for v4 and ~300 for v6. distinct routes. This sanity
// check that we didn't just return a single route for everything should be
@ -57,36 +624,65 @@ func TestInsert(t *testing.T) {
}
func TestInsertShuffled(t *testing.T) {
// The order in which you insert prefixes into a route table
// should not matter, as long as you're inserting the same set of
// routes. Verify that this is true, because ART does execute
// vastly different code depending on the order of insertion, even
// if the end result is identical.
//
// If you're here because this package's tests are slow and you
// want to make them faster, please do not delete this test (or
// any test, really). It may seem excessive to test this, but
// these shuffle tests found a lot of very nasty edge cases during
// development, and you _really_ don't want to be debugging a
// faulty route table in production.
t.Parallel()
pfxs := randomPrefixes(10_000)
pfxs := randomPrefixes(1000)
var pfxs2 []slowPrefixEntry[int]
rt := Table[int]{}
for _, pfx := range pfxs {
rt.Insert(pfx.pfx, pfx.val)
}
defer func() {
if t.Failed() {
t.Logf("pre-shuffle: %#v", pfxs)
t.Logf("post-shuffle: %#v", pfxs2)
}
}()
for i := 0; i < 10; i++ {
pfxs2 := append([]slowPrefixEntry[int](nil), pfxs...)
rand.Shuffle(len(pfxs2), func(i, j int) { pfxs2[i], pfxs2[j] = pfxs2[j], pfxs2[i] })
addrs := make([]netip.Addr, 0, 10_000)
for i := 0; i < 10_000; i++ {
addrs = append(addrs, randomAddr())
}
rt := Table[int]{}
rt2 := Table[int]{}
for _, pfx := range pfxs {
rt.Insert(pfx.pfx, pfx.val)
}
for _, pfx := range pfxs2 {
rt2.Insert(pfx.pfx, pfx.val)
}
// Diffing a deep tree of tables gives cmp.Diff a nervous breakdown, so
// test for equivalence statistically with random probes instead.
for i := 0; i < 10_000; i++ {
a := randomAddr()
for _, a := range addrs {
val1 := rt.Get(a)
val2 := rt2.Get(a)
if val1 == nil && val2 == nil {
continue
}
if (val1 == nil && val2 != nil) || (val1 != nil && val2 == nil) || (*val1 != *val2) {
t.Errorf("get(%q) = %s, want %s", a, printIntPtr(val2), printIntPtr(val1))
t.Fatalf("get(%q) = %s, want %s", a, printIntPtr(val2), printIntPtr(val1))
}
}
}
}
func TestDelete(t *testing.T) {
func TestDeleteCompare(t *testing.T) {
// Create large route tables repeatedly, delete half of their
// prefixes, and compare Table's behavior to a naive and slow but
// correct implementation.
t.Parallel()
const (
@ -104,6 +700,19 @@ func TestDelete(t *testing.T) {
toDelete := append([]slowPrefixEntry[int](nil), all4[deleteCut:]...)
toDelete = append(toDelete, all6[deleteCut:]...)
defer func() {
if t.Failed() {
for _, pfx := range pfxs {
fmt.Printf("%q, ", pfx.pfx)
}
fmt.Println("")
for _, pfx := range toDelete {
fmt.Printf("%q, ", pfx.pfx)
}
fmt.Println("")
}
}()
slow := slowPrefixTable[int]{pfxs}
fast := Table[int]{}
@ -146,6 +755,18 @@ func TestDelete(t *testing.T) {
}
func TestDeleteShuffled(t *testing.T) {
// The order in which you delete prefixes from a route table
// should not matter, as long as you're deleting the same set of
// routes. Verify that this is true, because ART does execute
// vastly different code depending on the order of deletions, even
// if the end result is identical.
//
// If you're here because this package's tests are slow and you
// want to make them faster, please do not delete this test (or
// any test, really). It may seem excessive to test this, but
// these shuffle tests found a lot of very nasty edge cases during
// development, and you _really_ don't want to be debugging a
// faulty route table in production.
t.Parallel()
const (
@ -205,6 +826,29 @@ func TestDeleteShuffled(t *testing.T) {
}
}
type tableTest struct {
// addr is an IP address string to look up in a route table.
addr string
// want is the expected >=0 value associated with the route, or -1
// if we expect a lookup miss.
want int
}
// checkRoutes verifies that the route lookups in tt return the
// expected results on tbl.
func checkRoutes(t *testing.T, tbl *Table[int], tt []tableTest) {
t.Helper()
for _, tc := range tt {
v := tbl.Get(netip.MustParseAddr(tc.addr))
if v == nil && tc.want != -1 {
t.Errorf("lookup %q got nil, want %d", tc.addr, tc.want)
}
if v != nil && *v != tc.want {
t.Errorf("lookup %q got %d, want %d", tc.addr, *v, tc.want)
}
}
}
// 100k routes for IPv6, at the current size of strideTable and strideEntry, is
// in the ballpark of 4GiB if you assume worst-case prefix distribution. Future
// optimizations will knock down the memory consumption by over an order of
@ -402,6 +1046,32 @@ func (t *runningTimer) Elapsed() time.Duration {
return t.cumulative
}
func checkSize(t *testing.T, tbl *Table[int], want int) {
t.Helper()
if got := tbl.numStrides(); got != want {
t.Errorf("wrong table size, got %d strides want %d", got, want)
}
}
func (t *Table[T]) numStrides() int {
seen := map[*strideTable[T]]bool{}
return t.numStridesRec(seen, &t.v4) + t.numStridesRec(seen, &t.v6)
}
func (t *Table[T]) numStridesRec(seen map[*strideTable[T]]bool, st *strideTable[T]) int {
ret := 1
if st.childRefs == 0 {
return ret
}
for i := firstHostIndex; i <= lastHostIndex; i++ {
if c := st.entries[i].child; c != nil && !seen[c] {
seen[c] = true
ret += t.numStridesRec(seen, c)
}
}
return ret
}
// slowPrefixTable is a routing table implemented as a set of prefixes that are
// explicitly scanned in full for every route lookup. It is very slow, but also
// reasonably easy to verify by inspection, and so a good correctness reference
@ -548,3 +1218,26 @@ func roundFloat64(f float64) float64 {
}
return ret
}
func minimize(pfxs []slowPrefixEntry[int], f func(skip map[netip.Prefix]bool) error) (map[netip.Prefix]bool, error) {
if f(nil) == nil {
return nil, nil
}
remove := map[netip.Prefix]bool{}
for lastLen := -1; len(remove) != lastLen; lastLen = len(remove) {
fmt.Println("len is ", len(remove))
for i, pfx := range pfxs {
if remove[pfx.pfx] {
continue
}
remove[pfx.pfx] = true
fmt.Printf("%d %d: trying without %s\n", i, len(remove), pfx.pfx)
if f(remove) == nil {
delete(remove, pfx.pfx)
}
}
}
return remove, f(remove)
}

Loading…
Cancel
Save