|
|
|
# Copyright 2019, David Wilson
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# Redistribution and use in source and binary forms, with or without
|
|
|
|
# modification, are permitted provided that the following conditions are met:
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# 1. Redistributions of source code must retain the above copyright notice,
|
|
|
|
# this list of conditions and the following disclaimer.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# 2. Redistributions in binary form must reproduce the above copyright notice,
|
|
|
|
# this list of conditions and the following disclaimer in the documentation
|
|
|
|
# and/or other materials provided with the distribution.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# 3. Neither the name of the copyright holder nor the names of its contributors
|
|
|
|
# may be used to endorse or promote products derived from this software without
|
|
|
|
# specific prior written permission.
|
|
|
|
#
|
|
|
|
# THIS SOFTWARE IS PROVIDED BY THE COPYRIGHT HOLDERS AND CONTRIBUTORS "AS IS"
|
|
|
|
# AND ANY EXPRESS OR IMPLIED WARRANTIES, INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, THE
|
|
|
|
# IMPLIED WARRANTIES OF MERCHANTABILITY AND FITNESS FOR A PARTICULAR PURPOSE
|
|
|
|
# ARE DISCLAIMED. IN NO EVENT SHALL THE COPYRIGHT HOLDER OR CONTRIBUTORS BE
|
|
|
|
# LIABLE FOR ANY DIRECT, INDIRECT, INCIDENTAL, SPECIAL, EXEMPLARY, OR
|
|
|
|
# CONSEQUENTIAL DAMAGES (INCLUDING, BUT NOT LIMITED TO, PROCUREMENT OF
|
|
|
|
# SUBSTITUTE GOODS OR SERVICES; LOSS OF USE, DATA, OR PROFITS; OR BUSINESS
|
|
|
|
# INTERRUPTION) HOWEVER CAUSED AND ON ANY THEORY OF LIABILITY, WHETHER IN
|
|
|
|
# CONTRACT, STRICT LIABILITY, OR TORT (INCLUDING NEGLIGENCE OR OTHERWISE)
|
|
|
|
# ARISING IN ANY WAY OUT OF THE USE OF THIS SOFTWARE, EVEN IF ADVISED OF THE
|
|
|
|
# POSSIBILITY OF SUCH DAMAGE.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
As Mitogen separates asynchronous IO out to a broker thread, communication
|
|
|
|
necessarily involves context switching and waking that thread. When application
|
|
|
|
threads and the broker share a CPU, this can be almost invisibly fast - around
|
|
|
|
25 microseconds for a full A->B->A round-trip.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
However when threads are scheduled on different CPUs, round-trip delays
|
|
|
|
regularly vary wildly, and easily into milliseconds. Many contributing factors
|
|
|
|
exist, not least scenarios like:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. A is preempted immediately after waking B, but before releasing the GIL.
|
|
|
|
2. B wakes from IO wait only to immediately enter futex wait.
|
|
|
|
3. A may wait 10ms or more for another timeslice, as the scheduler on its CPU
|
|
|
|
runs threads unrelated to its transaction (i.e. not B), wake only to release
|
|
|
|
its GIL, before entering IO sleep waiting for a reply from B, which cannot
|
|
|
|
exist yet.
|
|
|
|
4. B wakes, acquires GIL, performs work, and sends reply to A, causing it to
|
|
|
|
wake. B is preempted before releasing GIL.
|
|
|
|
5. A wakes from IO wait only to immediately enter futex wait.
|
|
|
|
6. B may wait 10ms or more for another timeslice, wake only to release its GIL,
|
|
|
|
before sleeping again.
|
|
|
|
7. A wakes, acquires GIL, finally receives reply.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Per above if we are unlucky, on an even moderately busy machine it is possible
|
|
|
|
to lose milliseconds just in scheduling delay, and the effect is compounded
|
|
|
|
when pairs of threads in process A are communicating with pairs of threads in
|
|
|
|
process B using the same scheme, such as when Ansible WorkerProcess is
|
|
|
|
communicating with ContextService in the connection multiplexer. In the worst
|
|
|
|
case it could involve 4 threads working in lockstep spread across 4 busy CPUs.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Since multithreading in Python is essentially useless except for waiting on IO
|
|
|
|
due to the presence of the GIL, at least in Ansible there is no good reason for
|
|
|
|
threads in the same process to run on distinct CPUs - they always operate in
|
|
|
|
lockstep due to the GIL, and are thus vulnerable to issues like above.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Linux lacks any natural API to describe what we want, it only permits
|
|
|
|
individual threads to be constrained to run on specific CPUs, and for that
|
|
|
|
constraint to be inherited by new threads and forks of the constrained thread.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This module therefore implements a CPU pinning policy for Ansible processes,
|
|
|
|
providing methods that should be called early in any new process, either to
|
|
|
|
rebalance which CPU it is pinned to, or in the case of subprocesses, to remove
|
|
|
|
the pinning entirely. It is likely to require ongoing tweaking, since pinning
|
|
|
|
necessarily involves preventing the scheduler from making load balancing
|
|
|
|
decisions.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
from __future__ import absolute_import, division, print_function
|
|
|
|
__metaclass__ = type
|
|
|
|
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
import ctypes
|
|
|
|
import logging
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
import mmap
|
|
|
|
import multiprocessing
|
|
|
|
import os
|
|
|
|
import struct
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
import mitogen.core
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
import mitogen.parent
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
LOG = logging.getLogger(__name__)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
_libc = ctypes.CDLL(None, use_errno=True)
|
|
|
|
_strerror = _libc.strerror
|
|
|
|
_strerror.restype = ctypes.c_char_p
|
|
|
|
_sem_init = _libc.sem_init
|
|
|
|
_sem_wait = _libc.sem_wait
|
|
|
|
_sem_post = _libc.sem_post
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
_sched_setaffinity = _libc.sched_setaffinity
|
|
|
|
except (OSError, AttributeError):
|
|
|
|
_libc = None
|
|
|
|
_strerror = None
|
|
|
|
_sem_init = None
|
|
|
|
_sem_wait = None
|
|
|
|
_sem_post = None
|
|
|
|
_sched_setaffinity = None
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class sem_t(ctypes.Structure):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Wrap sem_t to allow storing a lock in shared memory.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
_fields_ = [
|
|
|
|
('data', ctypes.c_uint8 * 128),
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def init(self):
|
|
|
|
if _sem_init(self.data, 1, 1):
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
raise Exception(_strerror(ctypes.get_errno()))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def acquire(self):
|
|
|
|
if _sem_wait(self.data):
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
raise Exception(_strerror(ctypes.get_errno()))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def release(self):
|
|
|
|
if _sem_post(self.data):
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
raise Exception(_strerror(ctypes.get_errno()))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class State(ctypes.Structure):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Contents of shared memory segment. This allows :meth:`Manager.assign` to be
|
|
|
|
called from any child, since affinity assignment must happen from within
|
|
|
|
the context of the new child process.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
_fields_ = [
|
|
|
|
('lock', sem_t),
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
('counter', ctypes.c_uint8),
|
|
|
|
]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class Policy(object):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Process affinity policy.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
def assign_controller(self):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Assign the Ansible top-level policy to this process.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assign_muxprocess(self, index):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Assign the MuxProcess policy to this process.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assign_worker(self):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Assign the WorkerProcess policy to this process.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assign_subprocess(self):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Assign the helper subprocess policy to this process.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class FixedPolicy(Policy):
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
:class:`Policy` for machines where the only control method available is
|
|
|
|
fixed CPU placement. The scheme here was tested on an otherwise idle 16
|
|
|
|
thread machine.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
- The connection multiplexer is pinned to CPU 0.
|
|
|
|
- The Ansible top-level (strategy) is pinned to CPU 1.
|
|
|
|
- WorkerProcesses are pinned sequentually to 2..N, wrapping around when no
|
|
|
|
more CPUs exist.
|
|
|
|
- Children such as SSH may be scheduled on any CPU except 0/1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
If the machine has less than 4 cores available, the top-level and workers
|
|
|
|
are pinned between CPU 2..N, i.e. no CPU is reserved for the top-level
|
|
|
|
process.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This could at least be improved by having workers pinned to independent
|
|
|
|
cores, before reusing the second hyperthread of an existing core.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A hook is installed that causes :meth:`reset` to run in the child of any
|
|
|
|
process created with :func:`mitogen.parent.popen`, ensuring CPU-intensive
|
|
|
|
children like SSH are not forced to share the same core as the (otherwise
|
|
|
|
potentially very busy) parent.
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
def __init__(self, cpu_count=None):
|
|
|
|
#: For tests.
|
|
|
|
self.cpu_count = cpu_count or multiprocessing.cpu_count()
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
self.mem = mmap.mmap(-1, 4096)
|
|
|
|
self.state = State.from_buffer(self.mem)
|
|
|
|
self.state.lock.init()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if self.cpu_count < 2:
|
|
|
|
# uniprocessor
|
|
|
|
self._reserve_mux = False
|
|
|
|
self._reserve_controller = False
|
|
|
|
self._reserve_mask = 0
|
|
|
|
self._reserve_shift = 0
|
|
|
|
elif self.cpu_count < 4:
|
|
|
|
# small SMP
|
|
|
|
self._reserve_mux = True
|
|
|
|
self._reserve_controller = False
|
|
|
|
self._reserve_mask = 1
|
|
|
|
self._reserve_shift = 1
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
# big SMP
|
|
|
|
self._reserve_mux = True
|
|
|
|
self._reserve_controller = True
|
|
|
|
self._reserve_mask = 3
|
|
|
|
self._reserve_shift = 2
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _set_affinity(self, descr, mask):
|
|
|
|
if descr:
|
|
|
|
LOG.debug('CPU mask for %s: %#08x', descr, mask)
|
|
|
|
mitogen.parent._preexec_hook = self._clear
|
|
|
|
self._set_cpu_mask(mask)
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _balance(self, descr):
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
self.state.lock.acquire()
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
n = self.state.counter
|
|
|
|
self.state.counter += 1
|
|
|
|
finally:
|
|
|
|
self.state.lock.release()
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
self._set_cpu(descr, self._reserve_shift + (
|
|
|
|
(n % (self.cpu_count - self._reserve_shift))
|
|
|
|
))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _set_cpu(self, descr, cpu):
|
|
|
|
self._set_affinity(descr, 1 << (cpu % self.cpu_count))
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _clear(self):
|
|
|
|
all_cpus = (1 << self.cpu_count) - 1
|
|
|
|
self._set_affinity(None, all_cpus & ~self._reserve_mask)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assign_controller(self):
|
|
|
|
if self._reserve_controller:
|
|
|
|
self._set_cpu('Ansible top-level process', 1)
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
self._balance('Ansible top-level process')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assign_muxprocess(self, index):
|
|
|
|
self._set_cpu('MuxProcess %d' % (index,), index)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assign_worker(self):
|
|
|
|
self._balance('WorkerProcess')
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def assign_subprocess(self):
|
|
|
|
self._clear()
|
ansible: new multiplexer/workers configuration
Following on from 152effc26c9a5918cb7ead7a97fe7fa7f81b6764,
* Pin mux to CPU 0
* Pin top-level CPU 1
* Pin workers sequentially to CPU 2..n
Nets 19.5% improvement on issue_140__thread_pileup.yml when targetting
64 Docker containers on the same 8 core/16 thread machine.
Before (prior to last scheme, no affinity at all):
2294528.731458 task-clock (msec) # 6.443 CPUs utilized
10,429,745 context-switches # 0.005 M/sec
2,049,618 cpu-migrations # 0.893 K/sec
8,258,952 page-faults # 0.004 M/sec
5,532,719,253,824 cycles # 2.411 GHz (83.35%)
3,267,471,616,230 instructions # 0.59 insn per cycle
# 1.22 stalled cycles per insn (83.35%)
662,006,455,943 branches # 288.515 M/sec (83.33%)
39,453,895,977 branch-misses # 5.96% of all branches (83.37%)
356.148064576 seconds time elapsed
After:
2226463.958975 task-clock (msec) # 7.784 CPUs utilized
9,831,466 context-switches # 0.004 M/sec
180,065 cpu-migrations # 0.081 K/sec
5,082,278 page-faults # 0.002 M/sec
5,592,548,587,259 cycles # 2.512 GHz (83.35%)
3,135,038,855,414 instructions # 0.56 insn per cycle
# 1.32 stalled cycles per insn (83.32%)
636,397,509,232 branches # 285.833 M/sec (83.30%)
39,135,441,790 branch-misses # 6.15% of all branches (83.35%)
286.036681644 seconds time elapsed
6 years ago
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
class LinuxPolicy(FixedPolicy):
|
|
|
|
def _mask_to_bytes(self, mask):
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
Convert the (type long) mask to a cpu_set_t.
|
|
|
|
"""
|
|
|
|
chunks = []
|
|
|
|
shiftmask = (2 ** 64) - 1
|
|
|
|
for x in range(16):
|
|
|
|
chunks.append(struct.pack('<Q', mask & shiftmask))
|
|
|
|
mask >>= 64
|
|
|
|
return mitogen.core.b('').join(chunks)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _get_thread_ids(self):
|
|
|
|
try:
|
|
|
|
ents = os.listdir('/proc/self/task')
|
|
|
|
except OSError:
|
|
|
|
LOG.debug('cannot fetch thread IDs for current process')
|
|
|
|
return [os.getpid()]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
return [int(s) for s in ents if s.isdigit()]
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
def _set_cpu_mask(self, mask):
|
|
|
|
s = self._mask_to_bytes(mask)
|
|
|
|
for tid in self._get_thread_ids():
|
|
|
|
_sched_setaffinity(tid, len(s), s)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
if _sched_setaffinity is not None:
|
|
|
|
policy = LinuxPolicy()
|
|
|
|
else:
|
|
|
|
policy = Policy()
|