Instant Messaging ================= .. _module:im: This module adds support for sending human-readable messages to a room. It also adds support for associating human-readable information with the room itself such as a room name and topic. Events ------ {{m_room_message_event}} {{m_room_message_feedback_event}} Usage of this event is discouraged for several reasons: - The number of feedback events will grow very quickly with the number of users in the room. This event provides no way to "batch" feedback, unlike the `receipts module`_. - Pairing feedback to messages gets complicated when paginating as feedback arrives before the message it is acknowledging. - There are no guarantees that the client has seen the event ID being acknowledged. .. _`receipts module`: `module:receipts`_ {{m_room_name_event}} {{m_room_topic_event}} m.room.message msgtypes ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Each `m.room.message`_ MUST have a ``msgtype`` key which identifies the type of message being sent. Each type has their own required and optional keys, as outlined below. If a client cannot display the given ``msgtype`` then it SHOULD display the fallback plain text ``body`` key instead. {{msgtype_events}} Client behaviour ---------------- Clients SHOULD verify the structure of incoming events to ensure that the expected keys exist and that they are of the right type. Clients can discard malformed events or display a placeholder message to the user. Redacted ``m.room.message`` events MUST be removed from the client. This can either be replaced with placeholder text (e.g. "[REDACTED]") or the redacted message can be removed entirely from the messages view. Events which have attachments (e.g. ``m.image``, ``m.file``) SHOULD be uploaded using the `content repository module`_ where available. The resulting ``mxc://`` URI can then be used in the ``url`` key. .. _`content repository module`: `module:content`_ Recommendations when sending messages ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Clients can send messages using ``POST`` or ``PUT`` requests. Clients SHOULD use ``PUT`` requests with `transaction IDs`_ to make requests idempotent. This ensures that messages are sent exactly once even under poor network conditions. Clients SHOULD retry requests using an exponential-backoff algorithm for a certain amount of time T. It is recommended that T is no longer than 5 minutes. After this time, the client should stop retrying and mark the message as "unsent". Users should be able to manually resend unsent messages. Users may type several messages at once and send them all in quick succession. Clients SHOULD preserve the order in which they were sent by the user. This means that clients should wait for the response to the previous request before sending the next request. This can lead to head-of-line blocking. In order to reduce the impact of head-of-line blocking, clients should use a queue per room rather than a global queue, as ordering is only relevant within a single room rather than between rooms. .. _`transaction IDs`: `sect:txn_ids`_ Local echo ~~~~~~~~~~ Messages SHOULD appear immediately in the message view when a user presses the "send" button. This should occur even if the message is still sending. This is referred to as "local echo". Clients SHOULD implement "local echo" of messages. Clients MAY display messages in a different format to indicate that the server has not processed the message. This format should be removed when the server responds. Clients need to be able to match the message they are sending with the same message which they receive from the event stream. The echo of the same message from the event stream is referred to as "remote echo". Both echoes need to be identified as the same message in order to prevent duplicate messages being displayed. Ideally this pairing would occur transparently to the user: the UI would not flicker as it transitions from local to remote. Flickering cannot be fully avoided in the current client-server API. Two scenarios need to be considered: - The client sends a message and the remote echo arrives on the event stream *after* the request to send the message completes. - The client sends a message and the remote echo arrives on the event stream *before* the request to send the message completes. In the first scenario, the client will receive an event ID when the request to send the message completes. This ID can be used to identify the duplicate event when it arrives on the event stream. However, in the second scenario, the event arrives before the client has obtained an event ID. This makes it impossible to identify it as a duplicate event. This results in the client displaying the message twice for a fraction of a second before the the original request to send the message completes. Once it completes, the client can take remedial actions to remove the duplicate event by looking for duplicate event IDs. A future version of the client-server API will resolve this by attaching the transaction ID of the sending request to the event itself. Displaying membership information with messages ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Clients may wish to show the display name and avatar URL of the room member who sent a message. This can be achieved by inspecting the ``m.room.member`` state event for that user ID. When a user paginates the message history, clients may wish to show the **historical** display name and avatar URL for a room member. This is possible because older ``m.room.member`` events are returned when paginating. This can be implemented efficiently by keeping two sets of room state: old and current. As new events arrive and/or the user paginates back in time, these two sets of state diverge from each other. New events update the current state and paginated events update the old state. When paginated events are processed sequentially, the old state represents the state of the room *at the time the event was sent*. This can then be used to set the historical display name and avatar URL. Server behaviour ---------------- Homeservers SHOULD reject ``m.room.message`` events which don't have a ``msgtype`` key, or which don't have a textual ``body`` key, with an HTTP status code of 400. Security considerations ----------------------- Messages sent using this module are not encrypted. Messages can be encrypted using the `E2E module`_. Clients should sanitise **all displayed keys** for unsafe HTML to prevent Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) attacks. This includes room names and topics. .. _`E2E module`: `module:e2e`_