--- type: module --- ### Receipts {{< changed-in v="1.4" >}} Added private read receipts. This module adds in support for receipts. These receipts are a form of acknowledgement of an event. This module defines the `m.read` receipt for indicating that the user has read up to a given event, and `m.read.private` to achieve the same purpose without any other user being aware. Primarily, `m.read.private` is intended to clear [notifications](#receiving-notifications) without advertising read-up-to status to others. Sending a receipt for each event can result in sending large amounts of traffic to a homeserver. To prevent this from becoming a problem, receipts are implemented using "up to" markers. This marker indicates that the acknowledgement applies to all events "up to and including" the event specified. For example, marking an event as "read" would indicate that the user had read all events *up to* the referenced event. See the [Receiving notifications](#receiving-notifications) section for more information on how read receipts affect notification counts. #### Events Each `user_id`, `receipt_type` pair must be associated with only a single `event_id`. {{% event event="m.receipt" %}} #### Client behaviour In `/sync`, receipts are listed under the `ephemeral` array of events for a given room. New receipts that come down the event streams are deltas which update existing mappings. Clients should replace older receipt acknowledgements based on `user_id` and `receipt_type` pairs. For example: Client receives m.receipt: user = @alice:example.com receipt_type = m.read event_id = $aaa:example.com Client receives another m.receipt: user = @alice:example.com receipt_type = m.read event_id = $bbb:example.com The client should replace the older acknowledgement for $aaa:example.com with this one for $bbb:example.com Clients should send read receipts when there is some certainty that the event in question has been **displayed** to the user. Simply receiving an event does not provide enough certainty that the user has seen the event. The user SHOULD need to *take some action* such as viewing the room that the event was sent to or dismissing a notification in order for the event to count as "read". Clients SHOULD NOT send read receipts for events sent by their own user. A client can update the markers for its user by interacting with the following HTTP APIs. {{% http-api spec="client-server" api="receipts" %}} ##### Private read receipts {{% added-in v="1.4" %}} Some users would like to mark a room as read, clearing their [notification counts](#receiving-notifications), but not give away the fact that they've read a particular message yet. To achieve this, clients can send `m.read.private` receipts instead of `m.read` to do exactly that: clear notifications and not broadcast the receipt to other users. Servers MUST NOT send the `m.read.private` receipt to any other user than the one which originally sent it. Between `m.read` and `m.read.private`, the receipt which is more "ahead" or "recent" is used when determining the highest read-up-to mark. See the [notifications](#receiving-notifications) section for more information on how this affects notification counts. If a client sends an `m.read` receipt which is "behind" the `m.read.private` receipt, other users will see that change happen but the sending user will not have their notification counts rewound to that point in time. While uncommon, it is considered valid to have an `m.read` (public) receipt lag several messages behind the `m.read.private` receipt, for example. #### Server behaviour For efficiency, receipts SHOULD be batched into one event per room before delivering them to clients. Some receipts are sent across federation as EDUs with type `m.receipt`. The format of the EDUs are: ``` { : { : { : { } }, ... }, ... } ``` These are always sent as deltas to previously sent receipts. Currently only a single `` should be used: `m.read`. `m.read.private` MUST NOT appear in this federated `m.receipt` EDU. #### Security considerations As receipts are sent outside the context of the event graph, there are no integrity checks performed on the contents of `m.receipt` events.