Application Service API ======================= The Matrix client-server API and server-server APIs provide the means to implement a consistent self-contained federated messaging fabric. However, they provide limited means of implementing custom server-side behaviour in Matrix (e.g. gateways, filters, extensible hooks etc). The Application Service API (AS API) defines a standard API to allow such extensible functionality to be implemented irrespective of the underlying homeserver implementation. .. TODO-spec Add in Client-Server services? Overview of bots? Seems weird to be in the spec given it is VERY implementation specific. .. contents:: Table of Contents .. sectnum:: Application Services -------------------- Application services are passive and can only observe events from a given homeserver. They can inject events into rooms they are participating in. They cannot prevent events from being sent, nor can they modify the content of the event being sent. In order to observe events from a homeserver, the homeserver needs to be configured to pass certain types of traffic to the application service. This is achieved by manually configuring the homeserver with information about the application service (AS). Registration ~~~~~~~~~~~~ .. NOTE:: Previously, application services could register with a homeserver via HTTP APIs. This was removed as it was seen as a security risk. A compromised application service could re-register for a global ``*`` regex and sniff *all* traffic on the homeserver. To protect against this, application services now have to register via configuration files which are linked to the homeserver configuration file. The addition of configuration files allows homeserver admins to sanity check the registration for suspicious regex strings. .. TODO Removing the API entirely is probably a mistake - having a standard cross-HS way of doing this stops ASes being coupled to particular HS implementations. A better solution would be to somehow mandate that the API done to avoid abuse. Application services register "namespaces" of user IDs, room aliases and room IDs. These namespaces are represented as regular expressions. An application service is said to be "interested" in a given event if one of the IDs in the event match the regular expression provided by the application service. An application service can also state whether they should be the only ones who can manage a specified namespace. This is referred to as an "exclusive" namespace. An exclusive namespace prevents humans and other application services from creating/deleting entities in that namespace. Typically, exclusive namespaces are used when the rooms represent real rooms on another service (e.g. IRC). Non-exclusive namespaces are used when the application service is merely augmenting the room itself (e.g. providing logging or searching facilities). Namespaces are represented by POSIX extended regular expressions and look like: .. code-block:: yaml users: - exclusive: true regex: @irc.freenode.net_.* The registration is represented by a series of key-value pairs, which this specification will present as YAML. An example HS configuration required to pass traffic to the AS is: .. code-block:: yaml id: url: as_token: hs_token: sender_localpart: namespaces: users: # Namespaces of users which should be delegated to the AS - exclusive: regex: - ... aliases: [] # Namespaces of room aliases which should be delegated to the AS rooms: [] # Namespaces of room ids which should be delegated to the AS .. WARNING:: If the homeserver in question has multiple application services, each ``as_token`` and ``id`` MUST be unique per application service as these are used to identify the application service. The homeserver MUST enforce this. Homeserver -> Application Service API ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Pushing events ++++++++++++++ The application service API provides a transaction API for sending a list of events. Each list of events includes a transaction ID, which works as follows: :: Typical HS ---> AS : Homeserver sends events with transaction ID T. <--- : AS sends back 200 OK. AS ACK Lost HS ---> AS : Homeserver sends events with transaction ID T. <-/- : AS 200 OK is lost. HS ---> AS : Homeserver retries with the same transaction ID of T. <--- : AS sends back 200 OK. If the AS had processed these events already, it can NO-OP this request (and it knows if it is the same events based on the transaction ID). The events sent to the application service should be linearised, as if they were from the event stream. The homeserver MUST maintain a queue of transactions to send to the AS. If the application service cannot be reached, the homeserver SHOULD backoff exponentially until the application service is reachable again. As application services cannot *modify* the events in any way, these requests can be made without blocking other aspects of the homeserver. Homeservers MUST NOT alter (e.g. add more) events they were going to send within that transaction ID on retries, as the AS may have already processed the events. Querying ++++++++ The application service API includes two querying APIs: for room aliases and for user IDs. The application service SHOULD create the queried entity if it desires. During this process, the application service is blocking the homeserver until the entity is created and configured. If the homeserver does not receive a response to this request, the homeserver should retry several times before timing out. This should result in an HTTP status 408 "Request Timeout" on the client which initiated this request (e.g. to join a room alias). .. admonition:: Rationale Blocking the homeserver and expecting the application service to create the entity using the client-server API is simpler and more flexible than alternative methods such as returning an initial sync style JSON blob and get the HS to provision the room/user. This also meant that there didn't need to be a "backchannel" to inform the application service about information about the entity such as room ID to room alias mappings. HTTP APIs +++++++++ This contains application service APIs which are used by the homeserver. All application services MUST implement these APIs. These APIs are defined below. {{application_service_as_http_api}} .. _create the user: `sect:asapi-permissions`_ Client-Server API Extensions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ Application services can use a more powerful version of the client-server API by identifying itself as an application service to the homeserver. Identity assertion ++++++++++++++++++ The client-server API infers the user ID from the ``access_token`` provided in every request. It would be an annoying amount of book-keeping to maintain tokens for every virtual user. It would be preferable if the application service could use the CS API with its own ``as_token`` instead, and specify the virtual user they wish to be acting on behalf of. For real users, this would require additional permissions granting the AS permission to masquerade as a matrix user. Inputs: - Application service token (``access_token``) - User ID in the AS namespace to act as. Notes: - This will apply on all aspects of the CS API, except for Account Management. - The ``as_token`` is inserted into ``access_token`` which is usually where the client token is. This is done on purpose to allow application services to reuse client SDKs. :: /path?access_token=$token&user_id=$userid Query Parameters: access_token: The application service token user_id: The desired user ID to act as. Timestamp massaging +++++++++++++++++++ The application service may want to inject events at a certain time (reflecting the time on the network they are tracking e.g. irc, xmpp). Application services need to be able to adjust the ``origin_server_ts`` value to do this. Inputs: - Application service token (``as_token``) - Desired timestamp Notes: - This will only apply when sending events. :: /path?access_token=$token&ts=$timestamp Query Parameters added to the send event APIs only: access_token: The application service token ts: The desired timestamp Server admin style permissions ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++ .. _sect:asapi-permissions: The homeserver needs to give the application service *full control* over its namespace, both for users and for room aliases. This means that the AS should be able to create/edit/delete any room alias in its namespace, as well as create/delete any user in its namespace. No additional API changes need to be made in order for control of room aliases to be granted to the AS. Creation of users needs API changes in order to: - Work around captchas. - Have a 'passwordless' user. This involves bypassing the registration flows entirely. This is achieved by including the AS token on a ``/register`` request, along with a login type of ``m.login.application_service`` to set the desired user ID without a password. :: /register?access_token=$as_token Content: { type: "m.login.application_service", user: "" } Application services which attempt to create users or aliases *outside* of their defined namespaces will receive an error code ``M_EXCLUSIVE``. Similarly, normal users who attempt to create users or aliases *inside* an application service-defined namespace will receive the same ``M_EXCLUSIVE`` error code, but only if the application service has defined the namespace as ``exclusive``. ID conventions ~~~~~~~~~~~~~~ .. TODO-spec - Giving HSes the freedom to namespace still feels like the Right Thing here. - Exposing a public API provides the consistency which was the main complaint against namespacing. - This may have knock-on effects for the AS registration API. E.g. why don't we let ASes specify the *URI* regex they want? This concerns the well-defined conventions for mapping 3P network IDs to matrix IDs, which we expect clients to be able to do by themselves. User IDs ++++++++ Matrix users may wish to directly contact a virtual user, e.g. to send an email. The URI format is a well-structured way to represent a number of different ID types, including: - MSISDNs (``tel``) - Email addresses (``mailto``) - IRC nicks (``irc`` - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-butcher-irc-url-04) - XMPP (XEP-0032) - SIP URIs (RFC 3261) As a result, virtual user IDs SHOULD relate to their URI counterpart. This mapping from URI to user ID can be expressed in a number of ways: - Expose a C-S API on the HS which takes URIs and responds with user IDs. - Munge the URI with the user ID. Exposing an API would allow HSes to internally map user IDs however they like, at the cost of an extra round trip (of which the response can be cached). Munging the URI would allow clients to apply the mapping locally, but would force user X on service Y to always map to the same munged user ID. Considering the exposed API could just be applying this munging, there is more flexibility if an API is exposed. :: GET /_matrix/app/%CLIENT_MAJOR_VERSION%/user?uri=$url_encoded_uri Returns 200 OK: { user_id: } Room Aliases ++++++++++++ We may want to expose some 3P network rooms so Matrix users can join them directly, e.g. IRC rooms. We don't want to expose every 3P network room though, e.g. ``mailto``, ``tel``. Rooms which are publicly accessible (e.g. IRC rooms) can be exposed as an alias by the application service. Private rooms (e.g. sending an email to someone) should not be exposed in this way, but should instead operate using normal invite/join semantics. Therefore, the ID conventions discussed below are only valid for public rooms which expose room aliases. Matrix users may wish to join XMPP rooms (e.g. using XEP-0045) or IRC rooms. In both cases, these rooms can be expressed as URIs. For consistency, these "room" URIs SHOULD be mapped in the same way as "user" URIs. :: GET /_matrix/app/%CLIENT_MAJOR_VERSION%/alias?uri=$url_encoded_uri Returns 200 OK: { alias: } Event fields ++++++++++++ We recommend that any events that originated from a remote network should include an ``external_url`` field in their content to provide a way for Matrix clients to link into the 'native' client from which the event originated. For instance, this could contain the message-ID for emails/nntp posts, or a link to a blog comment when bridging blog comment traffic in & out of Matrix.