* clarification around implementation requirement, and mention new label
* add changelog
* fix typo
* Fix typos
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Upgrade most github actions
Gets rid of warning in CI complaining about those actions
using node 12.
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Upgrade node version used to run scripts
Use the latest LTS
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Add changelog
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
... and other improvements
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Specify our usage of ABNF for grammar
* Create 1582.clarification
* Update meta/documentation_style.rst
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
---------
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Bump the version of jsonschema
OpenAPI 3.1 uses JSON Schema Draft 2020-12 so we need a version that
supports it.
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Add changelog
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Fix PR number
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
---------
Signed-off-by: Kévin Commaille <zecakeh@tedomum.fr>
* Add a spec release checklist issue template
because I'm tired of copy/paste
* Document a chunk of our release approach
This should probably go elsewhere, but here is fine for now as a SCT-referenced doc/content.
* changelog
* Brief clarifications
* replace "<content>" with "content"
This parameter that's part of the content-repo openapi spec causes generators to mess up
* added changelogs
* Update changelogs/internal/newsfragments/1370.clarification
Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travpc@gmail.com>
Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travpc@gmail.com>
If an object definition already has an example, we shouldn't try to extend that
definition by adding examples derived from the individual properties. Doing so
is confusing, and there is no way to inhibit it when it is not desired. It's
also not what the RapiDoc viewere does, so we end up with examples being
inconsistent.
I forgot to set the `items` on an array definition, and got an extremely
opaque error. Hopefully this will improve the lives of anyone who makes a
similar mistake in future.
Kévin Commaille