Part of MSC2140
Convert status codes to strings if there is a string status code. Fixes a build error when we mix 4xx and 403 in the same definition. We also have to correct stringified numbers to pass the build.
The spec states that the action of a room key request cancellation
should be "cancel_request" but every known implementation uses
"request_cancellation" instead.
This patch fixes the spec to reflect the implementations.
This clarifies the `.m.rule.room_one_to_one` push rule by adding a condition on
event type. Some parts of the spec already had this info, while others were
missing it. Synapse has had this behaviour since the push rule appeared.
Fixes https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/2150
* Switch "an SAS" back to "a SAS"
* Remove the `next_method` field from m.key.verification.start$m.sas.v1
but add additional clarification to its description on
m.key.verification.start that it is never present for methods that
verify keys both ways.
Currently the *m.key.verification.start* event appears twice with the
exact same title, in the "Key verification framework" section and the
"Short Authentication (SAS) verification" section. It's not immediately
clear that the first occurrence describes the format of the event in
general terms and that the second occurrence describes the fields when
the *m.sas.v1* verification method is being used. This is a similar
relationship to the *m.room.message* event and its various *msgtype*
variants.
This commit does three things:
* It tweaks the generation of the documentation to change the title
of the second occurrence of *m.key.verification.start* to
distinguish it from the first.
* It updates the language in the description of the two versions of the
event to better describe the relationship between the two.
* It adds the optional `next_method` field to the schema of the
*m.sas.v1* variant, as specified in the general form of
*m.key.verification.start*.
Signed-off-by: Jimmy Cuadra <jimmy@jimmycuadra.com>
m.room.message msgtypes.
Now that content referenced by the *m.audio*, *m.file*, *m.image*, and
*m.video* message types can be encrypted, the `url` field is required
*only* if the content is unencrypted. The "required" designation in the
event schemas (which prefixes the field description with "Required" in
bold in the generated HTML) is used to indicate fields which must always
be present, and this is no longer the case.
Signed-off-by: Jimmy Cuadra <jimmy@jimmycuadra.com>
Fixes https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1166
Fixes https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1527
Fixes https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1827
Note: In order to fix the "state events have the following fields: [no words]" bug (1827) we need to resolve references on common event types. When doing this we ultimately end up with more fields than may be required to explain the section, however this commit alters the section descriptions to just say "these fields" instead of "these additional fields".
This is also preferable over trying to get the inheritance reversed in the common event types, as the `/sync` endpoint has a high amount of reliance on partial events definitions.
Fixes https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/2066
The expectation everywhere is that the `sender` is required. `/initialSync` references StrippedState through a `m.room.member` event reference, and does not need editing.
# is reserved by the swagger validator as a way to include partial content from a JSON object (eg: "#/path" would include {"test": true} from the object {"path":{"test":true}}). Instead of trying to convince the validator that it is wrong, we'll just use a different character.
Note that our rendering tools do not care about #-style references to objects. It's still somewhat worth changing the character though.
As per [MSC1452](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1452)
Fixes https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1254
Although MSC1452 focuses on just the warnings part of the server notices, the base for notices has not been established in the spec. This commit adds the needed support to be able to handle notices.
No intentional divergences from the proposal are included in this changeset. There are a few additions which are used in practice although not defined in the proposal, such as who is responsible for aesthetics, sending notices, and other misc rules.
Travis Ralston