* Spec MSC3771: Threaded read receipts
Note: this builds on a (as of writing) non-existent "threading" section, which is part of a different commit.
* Spec MSC3773: Threaded notifications
* changelog
* Various clarifications per review
* Spec MSC3440: Threading (just the base)
Other threading MSCs to follow
* Spec MSC3856: Threads list API
* Spec MSC3715: Add`dir` to `/relations`
* changelog
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Patrick Cloke <clokep@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update changelogs/client_server/newsfragments/1254.feature
Co-authored-by: Patrick Cloke <clokep@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Patrick Cloke <clokep@users.noreply.github.com>
* Convert `m.receipt.yaml` to traditional YAML
* Spec MSC2285 (private read receipts)
* Add some obvious copyright headers
* Add changelog entries
* Appease the linter
Apparently it hates it when you do this.
* Allow m.fully_read on /receipts
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Matthew Hodgson <matthew@matrix.org>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Hodgson <matthew@matrix.org>
* Add CORP headers to media repo
MSC: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3828
* Write weird CSS rules to make added-in work inline in the CS spec
Even though our content doesn't need 2 paragraphs, it's good to have the capability to render it in the future.
* Remove test paragraph
* Refine prose
* spelling is key
* Fix typo in m.secret.request device event name
I don't think this is supposed to be plural according to the various SDKs
* Add changelog
* Update changelogs/client_server/newsfragments/1135.clarification
* Update changelogs/client_server/newsfragments/1135.clarification
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travpc@gmail.com>
* Revert "Note a more efficient computation of the auth difference. (#1119)"
This reverts commit a707266e50.
* Changelog
* Delete 1132.misc
Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travpc@gmail.com>
In #1042 I incorrectly wrote that the conflicted state set is a set of
pairs (K, V). We later take the union of the conflicted state set and
the auth difference. The latter is a set of events (V) only.
Fix this by making the conflicted state set a set of events rather than
a set of pairs. That is, the conflicted state set is a a `Set[Event]`
instead of a `Set[((type, state key), event)]`.
* Commit to show changes to rich replies section
* Move rich replies to a module
* Add remainder of MSC2674
* Pivot away from MSC3440: Threads
* Add changelog entries so far
* Make a note for why we have aggregations/relations if nothing uses it
* Outright remove threads references
Apparently this breaks the table of contents
* Define MSC2675
* Define MSC3666
* Add note for rich replies?
* Update content/client-server-api/_index.md
Co-authored-by: Patrick Cloke <clokep@users.noreply.github.com>
* Clarify how ignoring works for aggregations.
* Try to clarify redactions a bit
* Clarify using parent/child language
* Add missing bits of MSC2675
* Add changelog for aggregations
* Appease the linters
* Update data/api/client-server/relations.yaml
Co-authored-by: Patrick Cloke <clokep@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Try to clarify the return of /relations
* Fix required attribute
* Fix wording round 1
* Try to fix pagination
* Copy/paste the endpoint to make Open API happy
* Fix code block examples for rich replies
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply suggestions on all 3 endpoints
* Fix description of relationships API
* Fix warning about server-side aggregation/bundling
Co-authored-by: Patrick Cloke <clokep@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Clarification on historical power level handling
* Revert "Clarification on historical power level handling"
This reverts commit f443b3d5a9.
* Clean up
* Let us try this again not using VS Code
* Markdown is full of mysteries
* Move stringy power levels to room versions
* Describe range
* Fix minor issues with previous room version stuff
* Copy/paste v9 into v10
* Describe deprecated formatting
* Paste unmodified auth rules from v8 into v10
* Move 9.1 to 9.3, add 9.1 and 9.2 for integer enforcement
* Add knock_restricted to v10 auth
* Misc cleanup and clarification for fragments
* Describe `knock_restricted` client changes
* Changelogs
* spelling
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Apply code review suggestions manually
* Fix v9 redactions
* Fix auth rules clarity issues
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* Remove false integer requirements
Co-authored-by: Neil Alexander <neilalexander@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
* clarify federation Authorization header an add destination property
* add changelogs
* some clarifications
* more clarifications, fixes
* use HTML in the added-in/changed-in shortcodes
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travpc@gmail.com>
Richard van der Hoff