* Spec MSC3771: Threaded read receipts
Note: this builds on a (as of writing) non-existent "threading" section, which is part of a different commit.
* Spec MSC3773: Threaded notifications
* changelog
* Various clarifications per review
* Spec MSC3440: Threading (just the base)
Other threading MSCs to follow
* Spec MSC3856: Threads list API
* Spec MSC3715: Add`dir` to `/relations`
* changelog
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Patrick Cloke <clokep@users.noreply.github.com>
* Update changelogs/client_server/newsfragments/1254.feature
Co-authored-by: Patrick Cloke <clokep@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Patrick Cloke <clokep@users.noreply.github.com>
* Convert `m.receipt.yaml` to traditional YAML
* Spec MSC2285 (private read receipts)
* Add some obvious copyright headers
* Add changelog entries
* Appease the linter
Apparently it hates it when you do this.
* Allow m.fully_read on /receipts
* Apply suggestions from code review
Co-authored-by: Matthew Hodgson <matthew@matrix.org>
Co-authored-by: Matthew Hodgson <matthew@matrix.org>
* Add CORP headers to media repo
MSC: https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3828
* Write weird CSS rules to make added-in work inline in the CS spec
Even though our content doesn't need 2 paragraphs, it's good to have the capability to render it in the future.
* Remove test paragraph
* Refine prose
* spelling is key
* Remove redundant call to resolve-allof
All of the callers to resolve-additional-types already call resolve-allof (or
if not, they should), so this is redundant.
* Update `resolve-additional-types` to take a dict
I want to add more params to this, so first make it take a dict.
* `render-object-table`: take a "title" rather than a "caption"
... which means we can use the result from resolve-additional-types directly.
* render-object-table: support adding an anchor to generated tables.
* resolve-additional-types: generate an id for each returned type
* render-event: pass an anchor_base into resolve-additional-types
This means that it will generate an anchor for each type, whihc will then be
passed into render-object-table and used as an `id` for the table.
* render-operation: pass an anchor_base into resolve-additional-types
* newsfiles
* Fix typo in m.secret.request device event name
I don't think this is supposed to be plural according to the various SDKs
* Add changelog
* Update changelogs/client_server/newsfragments/1135.clarification
* Update changelogs/client_server/newsfragments/1135.clarification
Co-authored-by: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com>
Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travpc@gmail.com>
* Clarify that /invite will respond with 200 if the user is already in the room
* Create 1084.clarification
* Update changelogs/client_server/newsfragments/1084.clarification
Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travpc@gmail.com>
* Revert "Note a more efficient computation of the auth difference. (#1119)"
This reverts commit a707266e50.
* Changelog
* Delete 1132.misc
Co-authored-by: Travis Ralston <travpc@gmail.com>
* Arrange a few titles
Before this change, PublicRoomsChunk in the spec text could be found in
two places (actually three but the third one is identical to the first
one), defining two (_mostly_ identical but) different schemas.
Ctrl-F'ing through the spec may confuse you with the "wrong" definition.
This commit gives distinct schemas distinct names; aside from
PublicRoomChunk, the same story happens with the derivative of
stripped_state.yaml used in space_hierarchy.yaml (it's not exactly
StrippedStateEvent either).
As for the removal of `PublicRoomsChunks` (plural) - this title is
unnecessary because the tooling would place rather self-explanatory
`[PublicRoomsChunk]` without it, whereas the plural title ends up with
no definition in the spec text.
* Add changelog
* keys.yml: fix one_time_keys object contents
The alternatives previously listed under two additionalProperties levels
are actually one _more_ level deeper; we still can't define them in
a formal way before moving to OpenAPI 3 but at least let's be honest
and say there's always a dict where there's always a dict. Also,
since the same data structure is used in three places now, at least
give it a name, and document the actual definition (once) separately
(not using it now because it's OpenAPI 3).
* Changelog