|
|
|
@ -21,12 +21,6 @@ Matrix optionally supports end-to-end encryption, allowing rooms to be created
|
|
|
|
|
whose conversation contents is not decryptable or interceptable on any of the
|
|
|
|
|
participating homeservers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. WARNING::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
End to end encryption is being worked on and will be coming soon. This
|
|
|
|
|
section is incomplete. You can read more about what's underway at
|
|
|
|
|
http://matrix.org/speculator/spec/drafts%2Fe2e/client_server/unstable.html#end-to-end-encryption.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key Distribution
|
|
|
|
|
----------------
|
|
|
|
|
Encryption and Authentication in Matrix is based around public-key
|
|
|
|
@ -159,7 +153,7 @@ It is therefore expected that each client will maintain a list of devices for a
|
|
|
|
|
number of users (in practice, typically each user with whom we share an
|
|
|
|
|
encrypted room). Furthermore, it is likely that this list will need to be
|
|
|
|
|
persisted between invocations of the client application (to preserve device
|
|
|
|
|
verification data and to alert Alice if Bob suddently gets a new
|
|
|
|
|
verification data and to alert Alice if Bob suddenly gets a new
|
|
|
|
|
device).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alice's client can maintain a list of Bob's devices via the following
|
|
|
|
@ -176,9 +170,10 @@ process:
|
|
|
|
|
flag.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. During its normal processing of responses to |/sync|_, Alice's client
|
|
|
|
|
inspects the |device_lists|_ field. If it is tracking the device lists of
|
|
|
|
|
any of the listed users, then it marks the device lists for those users
|
|
|
|
|
outdated, and initiates another request to |/keys/query|_ for them.
|
|
|
|
|
inspects the ``changed`` property of the |device_lists|_ field. If it is
|
|
|
|
|
tracking the device lists of any of the listed users, then it marks the
|
|
|
|
|
device lists for those users outdated, and initiates another request to
|
|
|
|
|
|/keys/query|_ for them.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#. Periodically, Alice's client stores the ``next_batch`` field of the result
|
|
|
|
|
from |/sync|_ in persistent storage. If Alice later restarts her client, it
|
|
|
|
@ -214,6 +209,18 @@ process:
|
|
|
|
|
that the first request's results are ignored (possibly by cancelling the
|
|
|
|
|
request).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. Note::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When Bob and Alice share a room, with Bob tracking Alice's devices, she may leave
|
|
|
|
|
the room and then add a new device. Bob will not be notified of this change,
|
|
|
|
|
as he doesn't share a room anymore with Alice. When they start sharing a
|
|
|
|
|
room again, Bob has an out-of-date list of Alice's devices. In order to address
|
|
|
|
|
this issue, Bob's homeserver will add Alice's user ID to the ``changed`` property of
|
|
|
|
|
the ``device_lists`` field, thus Bob will update his list of Alice's devices as part
|
|
|
|
|
of his normal processing. Note that Bob can also be notified when he stops sharing
|
|
|
|
|
any room with Alice by inspecting the ``left`` property of the ``device_lists``
|
|
|
|
|
field, and as a result should remove her from its list of tracked users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. |device_lists| replace:: ``device_lists``
|
|
|
|
|
.. _`device_lists`: `device_lists_sync`_
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -228,10 +235,238 @@ A homeserver should rate-limit the number of one-time keys that a given user or
|
|
|
|
|
remote server can claim. A homeserver should discard the public part of a one
|
|
|
|
|
time key once it has given that key to another user.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Device verification
|
|
|
|
|
-------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Before Alice sends Bob encrypted data, or trusts data received from him, she
|
|
|
|
|
may want to verify that she is actually communicating with him, rather than a
|
|
|
|
|
man-in-the-middle. This verification process requires an out-of-band channel:
|
|
|
|
|
there is no way to do it within Matrix without trusting the administrators of
|
|
|
|
|
the homeservers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In Matrix, the basic process for device verification is for Alice to verify
|
|
|
|
|
that the public Ed25519 signing key she received via ``/keys/query`` for Bob's
|
|
|
|
|
device corresponds to the private key in use by Bob's device. For now, it is
|
|
|
|
|
recommended that clients provide mechanisms by which the user can see:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
1. The public part of their device's Ed25519 signing key, encoded using
|
|
|
|
|
`unpadded Base64`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
2. The list of devices in use for each user in a room, along with the public
|
|
|
|
|
Ed25519 signing key for each device, again encoded using unpadded Base64.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alice can then meet Bob in person, or contact him via some other trusted
|
|
|
|
|
medium, and ask him to read out the Ed25519 key shown on his device. She
|
|
|
|
|
compares this with the value shown for his device on her client.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Device verification may reach one of several conclusions. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Alice may "accept" the device. This means that she is satisfied that the
|
|
|
|
|
device belongs to Bob. She can then encrypt sensitive material for that
|
|
|
|
|
device, and knows that messages received were sent from that device.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Alice may "reject" the device. She will do this if she knows or suspects
|
|
|
|
|
that Bob does not control that device (or equivalently, does not trust
|
|
|
|
|
Bob). She will not send sensitive material to that device, and cannot trust
|
|
|
|
|
messages apparently received from it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Alice may choose to skip the device verification process. She is not able
|
|
|
|
|
to verify that the device actually belongs to Bob, but has no reason to
|
|
|
|
|
suspect otherwise. The encryption protocol continues to protect against
|
|
|
|
|
passive eavesdroppers.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. NOTE::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Once the signing key has been verified, it is then up to the encryption
|
|
|
|
|
protocol to verify that a given message was sent from a device holding that
|
|
|
|
|
Ed25519 private key, or to encrypt a message so that it may only be
|
|
|
|
|
decrypted by such a device. For the Olm protocol, this is documented at
|
|
|
|
|
https://matrix.org/git/olm/about/docs/signing.rst.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messaging Algorithms
|
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messaging Algorithm Names
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messaging algorithm names use the extensible naming scheme used throughout this
|
|
|
|
|
specification. Algorithm names that start with ``m.`` are reserved for
|
|
|
|
|
algorithms defined by this specification. Implementations wanting to experiment
|
|
|
|
|
with new algorithms must be uniquely globally namespaced following Java's package
|
|
|
|
|
naming conventions.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Algorithm names should be short and meaningful, and should list the primitives
|
|
|
|
|
used by the algorithm so that it is easier to see if the algorithm is using a
|
|
|
|
|
broken primitive.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A name of ``m.olm.v1`` is too short: it gives no information about the primitives
|
|
|
|
|
in use, and is difficult to extend for different primitives. However a name of
|
|
|
|
|
``m.olm.v1.ecdh-curve25519-hdkfsha256.hmacsha256.hkdfsha256-aes256-cbc-hmac64sha256``
|
|
|
|
|
is too long despite giving a more precise description of the algorithm: it adds
|
|
|
|
|
to the data transfer overhead and sacrifices clarity for human readers without
|
|
|
|
|
adding any useful extra information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``m.olm.v1.curve25519-aes-sha2``
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The name ``m.olm.v1.curve25519-aes-sha2`` corresponds to version 1 of the Olm
|
|
|
|
|
ratchet, as defined by the `Olm specification`_. This uses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* Curve25519 for the initial key agreement.
|
|
|
|
|
* HKDF-SHA-256 for ratchet key derivation.
|
|
|
|
|
* Curve25519 for the root key ratchet.
|
|
|
|
|
* HMAC-SHA-256 for the chain key ratchet.
|
|
|
|
|
* HKDF-SHA-256, AES-256 in CBC mode, and 8 byte truncated HMAC-SHA-256 for authenticated encryption.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Devices that support Olm must include "m.olm.v1.curve25519-aes-sha2" in their
|
|
|
|
|
list of supported messaging algorithms, must list a Curve25519 device key, and
|
|
|
|
|
must publish Curve25519 one-time keys.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An event encrypted using Olm has the following format:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: json
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.encrypted",
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {
|
|
|
|
|
"algorithm": "m.olm.v1.curve25519-aes-sha2",
|
|
|
|
|
"sender_key": "<sender_curve25519_key>",
|
|
|
|
|
"ciphertext": {
|
|
|
|
|
"<device_curve25519_key>": {
|
|
|
|
|
"type": 0,
|
|
|
|
|
"body": "<encrypted_payload_base_64>"
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``ciphertext`` is a mapping from device Curve25519 key to an encrypted payload
|
|
|
|
|
for that device. ``body`` is a Base64-encoded Olm message body. ``type`` is an
|
|
|
|
|
integer indicating the type of the message body: 0 for the initial pre-key
|
|
|
|
|
message, 1 for ordinary messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Olm sessions will generate messages with a type of 0 until they receive a
|
|
|
|
|
message. Once a session has decrypted a message it will produce messages with
|
|
|
|
|
a type of 1.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When a client receives a message with a type of 0 it must first check if it
|
|
|
|
|
already has a matching session. If it does then it will use that session to
|
|
|
|
|
try to decrypt the message. If there is no existing session then the client
|
|
|
|
|
must create a new session and use the new session to decrypt the message. A
|
|
|
|
|
client must not persist a session or remove one-time keys used by a session
|
|
|
|
|
until it has successfully decrypted a message using that session.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Messages with type 1 can only be decrypted with an existing session. If there
|
|
|
|
|
is no matching session, the client must treat this as an invalid message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The plaintext payload is of the form:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: json
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "<type of the plaintext event>",
|
|
|
|
|
"content": "<content for the plaintext event>",
|
|
|
|
|
"sender": "<sender_user_id>",
|
|
|
|
|
"recipient": "<recipient_user_id>",
|
|
|
|
|
"recipient_keys": {
|
|
|
|
|
"ed25519": "<our_ed25519_key>"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
"keys": {
|
|
|
|
|
"ed25519": "<sender_ed25519_key>"
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The type and content of the plaintext message event are given in the payload.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Other properties are included in order to prevent an attacker from publishing
|
|
|
|
|
someone else's curve25519 keys as their own and subsequently claiming to have
|
|
|
|
|
sent messages which they didn't.
|
|
|
|
|
``sender`` must correspond to the user who sent the event, ``recipient`` to
|
|
|
|
|
the local user, and ``recipient_keys`` to the local ed25519 key.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients must confirm that the ``sender_key`` and the ``ed25519`` field value
|
|
|
|
|
under the ``keys`` property match the keys returned by |/keys/query|_ for
|
|
|
|
|
the given user, and must also verify the signature of the payload. Without
|
|
|
|
|
this check, a client cannot be sure that the sender device owns the private
|
|
|
|
|
part of the ed25519 key it claims to have in the Olm payload.
|
|
|
|
|
This is crucial when the ed25519 key corresponds to a verified device.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``m.megolm.v1.aes-sha2``
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The name ``m.megolm.v1.aes-sha2`` corresponds to version 1 of the Megolm
|
|
|
|
|
ratchet, as defined by the `Megolm specification`_. This uses:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* HMAC-SHA-256 for the hash ratchet.
|
|
|
|
|
* HKDF-SHA-256, AES-256 in CBC mode, and 8 byte truncated HMAC-SHA-256 for authenticated encryption.
|
|
|
|
|
* Ed25519 for message authenticity.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Devices that support Megolm must support Olm, and include "m.megolm.v1.aes-sha2" in
|
|
|
|
|
their list of supported messaging algorithms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An event encrypted using Megolm has the following format:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: json
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.encrypted",
|
|
|
|
|
"content": {
|
|
|
|
|
"algorithm": "m.megolm.v1.aes-sha2",
|
|
|
|
|
"sender_key": "<sender_curve25519_key>",
|
|
|
|
|
"device_id": "<sender_device_id>",
|
|
|
|
|
"session_id": "<outbound_group_session_id>",
|
|
|
|
|
"ciphertext": "<encypted_payload_base_64>"
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The encrypted payload can contain any message event. The plaintext is of the form:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. code:: json
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"type": "<event_type>",
|
|
|
|
|
"content": "<event_content>",
|
|
|
|
|
"room_id": "<the room_id>"
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We include the room ID in the payload, because otherwise the homeserver would
|
|
|
|
|
be able to change the room a message was sent in.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients must guard against replay attacks by keeping track of the ratchet indices
|
|
|
|
|
of Megolm sessions. They should reject messages with a ratchet index that they
|
|
|
|
|
have already decrypted. Care should be taken in order to avoid false positives, as a
|
|
|
|
|
client may decrypt the same event twice as part of its normal processing.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As with Olm events, clients must confirm that the ``sender_key`` belongs to the user
|
|
|
|
|
who sent the message. The same reasoning applies, but the sender ed25519 key has to be
|
|
|
|
|
inferred from the ``keys.ed25519`` property of the event which established the Megolm
|
|
|
|
|
session.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In order to enable end-to-end encryption in a room, clients can send a
|
|
|
|
|
``m.room.encryption`` state event specifying ``m.megolm.v1.aes-sha2`` as its
|
|
|
|
|
``algorithm`` property.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
When creating a Megolm session in a room, clients must share the corresponding session
|
|
|
|
|
key using Olm with the intended recipients, so that they can decrypt future messages
|
|
|
|
|
encrypted using this session. A ``m.room_key`` event is used to do this. Clients
|
|
|
|
|
must also handle ``m.room_key`` events sent by other devices in order to decrypt their
|
|
|
|
|
messages.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Protocol definitions
|
|
|
|
|
--------------------
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Events
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{m_room_encryption_event}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{m_room_encrypted_event}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{m_room_key_event}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Key management API
|
|
|
|
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{keys_cs_http_api}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -249,6 +484,9 @@ specified). The client is expected to use |/keys/query|_ or |/keys/changes|_
|
|
|
|
|
for the equivalent functionality after an initial sync, as documented in
|
|
|
|
|
`Tracking the device list for a user`_.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It also adds a ``one_time_keys_count`` property. Note the spelling difference
|
|
|
|
|
with the ``one_time_key_counts`` property in the |/keys/upload|_ response.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. todo: generate this from a swagger definition?
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. device_lists: { changed: ["@user:server", ... ]},
|
|
|
|
@ -258,6 +496,9 @@ Parameter Type Description
|
|
|
|
|
============ =========== =====================================================
|
|
|
|
|
device_lists DeviceLists Optional. Information on e2e device updates. Note:
|
|
|
|
|
only present on an incremental sync.
|
|
|
|
|
|device_otk| {string: Optional. For each key algorithm, the number of
|
|
|
|
|
integer} unclaimed one-time keys currently held on the server
|
|
|
|
|
for this device.
|
|
|
|
|
============ =========== =====================================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
``DeviceLists``
|
|
|
|
@ -265,10 +506,20 @@ device_lists DeviceLists Optional. Information on e2e device updates. Note:
|
|
|
|
|
========= ========= =============================================
|
|
|
|
|
Parameter Type Description
|
|
|
|
|
========= ========= =============================================
|
|
|
|
|
changed [string] List of users who have updated their device identity keys
|
|
|
|
|
since the previous sync response.
|
|
|
|
|
changed [string] List of users who have updated their device identity keys,
|
|
|
|
|
or who now share an encrypted room with the client since
|
|
|
|
|
the previous sync response.
|
|
|
|
|
left [string] List of users with whom we do not share any encrypted rooms
|
|
|
|
|
anymore since the previous sync response.
|
|
|
|
|
========= ========= =============================================
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. NOTE::
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For optimal performance, Alice should be added to ``changed`` in Bob's sync only
|
|
|
|
|
when she adds a new device, or when Alice and Bob now share a room but didn't
|
|
|
|
|
share any room previously. However, for the sake of simpler logic, a server
|
|
|
|
|
may add Alice to ``changed`` when Alice and Bob share a new room, even if they
|
|
|
|
|
previously already shared a room.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Example response:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
@ -281,17 +532,27 @@ Example response:
|
|
|
|
|
"changed": [
|
|
|
|
|
"@alice:example.com",
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
"left": [
|
|
|
|
|
"@bob:example.com",
|
|
|
|
|
],
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
"device_one_time_keys_count": {
|
|
|
|
|
"curve25519": 10,
|
|
|
|
|
"signed_curve25519": 20
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. References
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _ed25519: http://ed25519.cr.yp.to/
|
|
|
|
|
.. _curve25519: https://cr.yp.to/ecdh.html
|
|
|
|
|
.. _`Olm specification`: http://matrix.org/docs/spec/olm.html
|
|
|
|
|
.. _`Megolm specification`: http://matrix.org/docs/spec/megolm.html
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. _`Signing JSON`: ../appendices.html#signing-json
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. |m.olm.v1.curve25519-aes-sha2| replace:: ``m.olm.v1.curve25519-aes-sha2``
|
|
|
|
|
.. |device_otk| replace:: device_one_time_keys_count
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
.. |/keys/upload| replace:: ``/keys/upload``
|
|
|
|
|
.. _/keys/upload: #post-matrix-client-%CLIENT_MAJOR_VERSION%-keys-upload
|
|
|
|
|