|
|
|
@ -219,7 +219,7 @@ reasonable to relax the requirement for a signed certificate for such traffic.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Conclusion
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that requiring homservers to present an X.509 certificate signed by
|
|
|
|
|
We believe that requiring homeservers to present an X.509 certificate signed by
|
|
|
|
|
a recognised Certificate Authority will improve security, reduce
|
|
|
|
|
centralisation, and eliminate some common deployment pitfalls.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|