Update transaction ID scope (#1526)

pull/1531/head
Richard van der Hoff 1 year ago committed by GitHub
parent 188d568f3a
commit c1ac9a9ad7
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

@ -0,0 +1 @@
Update the scope of transaction IDs, as per [MSC3970](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3970).

@ -237,19 +237,32 @@ For example, `PUT /_matrix/client/v3/rooms/{roomId}/send/{eventType}/{txnId}`
would return a `200 OK` with the `event_id` of the original request in
the response body.
As well as the HTTP path, the scope of a transaction ID is a "client
session", where that session is identified by a particular access token.
When [refreshing](#refreshing-access-tokens) an access token, the
transaction ID's scope is retained. This means that if a client with
token `A` uses `TXN1` as their transaction ID, refreshes the token to
`B`, and uses `TXN1` again it'll be assumed to be a duplicate request
and ignored. If the client logs out and back in between the `A` and `B`
tokens, `TXN1` could be used once for each.
The scope of a transaction ID is for a single [device](../index.html#devices),
and a single HTTP endpoint. In other words: a single device could use the same
transaction ID for a request to [`PUT
/_matrix/client/v3/rooms/{roomId}/send/{eventType}/{txnId}`](#put_matrixclientv3roomsroomidsendeventtypetxnid)
and [`PUT
/_matrix/client/v3/sendToDevice/{eventType}/{txnId}`](#put_matrixclientv3sendtodeviceeventtypetxnid),
and the two requests would be considered distinct because the two are
considered separate endpoints. Similarly, if a client logs out and back in
between two requests using the same transaction ID, the requests are distinct
because the act of logging in and out creates a new device (unless an existing
`device_id` is passed to [`POST
/_matrix/client/v3/login`](#post_matrixclientv3login)). On the other hand, if a
client re-uses a transaction ID for the same endpoint after
[refreshing](#refreshing-access-tokens) an access token, it will be assumed to
be a duplicate request and ignored. See also
[Relationship between access tokens and devices](#relationship-between-access-tokens-and-devices).
Some API endpoints may allow or require the use of `POST` requests
without a transaction ID. Where this is optional, the use of a `PUT`
request is strongly recommended.
{{% boxes/rationale %}}
Prior to `v1.7`, transaction IDs were scoped to "client sessions" rather than
devices.
{{% /boxes/rationale %}}
## Web Browser Clients
It is realistic to expect that some clients will be written to be run
@ -2671,4 +2684,3 @@ systems.
{{< cs-module name="event_annotations" >}}
{{< cs-module name="threading" >}}
{{< cs-module name="reference_relations" >}}

Loading…
Cancel
Save