From becc6676725252aa951e999c91e58ec143d16454 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Wed, 10 Apr 2024 07:16:01 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Update github-labels.rst (#1781) Fix formatting --- .../internal/newsfragments/1781.clarification | 1 + meta/github-labels.rst | 14 +++++++------- 2 files changed, 8 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) create mode 100644 changelogs/internal/newsfragments/1781.clarification diff --git a/changelogs/internal/newsfragments/1781.clarification b/changelogs/internal/newsfragments/1781.clarification new file mode 100644 index 00000000..4fb58650 --- /dev/null +++ b/changelogs/internal/newsfragments/1781.clarification @@ -0,0 +1 @@ +Fix `github-labels.rst` diff --git a/meta/github-labels.rst b/meta/github-labels.rst index 14fb9f69..44c52185 100644 --- a/meta/github-labels.rst +++ b/meta/github-labels.rst @@ -1,7 +1,7 @@ The following labels are used to help categorize issues: `spec-omission `_ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Things which have been implemented but not currently specified. These may range from entire API endpoints, to particular options or return parameters. @@ -17,7 +17,7 @@ Examples: `_ `clarification `_ --------------------------------------------------------------------------------- +--------------------------------------------------------------------------------- An area where the spec could do with being more explicit. @@ -30,7 +30,7 @@ Examples: `_ `spec-bug `_ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- +----------------------------------------------------------------------- Something which is in the spec, but is wrong. @@ -47,7 +47,7 @@ Examples: `_ `improvement `_ ----------------------------------------------------------------------------- +----------------------------------------------------------------------------- A suggestion for a relatively simple improvement to the protocol. @@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ Examples: `_ `feature `_ --------------------------------------------------------------------- +--------------------------------------------------------------------- A suggestion for a significant extension to the matrix protocol which needs considerable consideration before implementation. @@ -72,7 +72,7 @@ Examples: `wart `_ --------------------------------------------------------------- +--------------------------------------------------------------- A point where the protocol is inconsistent or inelegant, but which isn't really causing anybody any problems right now. Might be nice to consider fixing one @@ -80,7 +80,7 @@ day. `question `_ ----------------------------------------------------------------------- +----------------------------------------------------------------------- A thought or idea about the protocol which we aren't really sure whether to pursue or not.