Do not update typos

pull/1660/head
Kévin Commaille 8 months ago
parent 634717c2f4
commit afed585b01
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 29A48C1F03620416

@ -14,6 +14,6 @@ jobs:
uses: actions/checkout@v4
- name: Check spelling of proposals
uses: crate-ci/typos@4550e7d4371fcf55649adfcda9b77716658504b1
uses: crate-ci/typos@9be36f97fdbe645ee9a12449fb13aca856c2516a
with:
config: ${{github.workspace}}/.github/_typos.toml

@ -209,7 +209,7 @@ paths:
based on a preset.
If unspecified, the server should use the `visibility` to determine
which preset to use. A visibility of `public` equates to a preset of
which preset to use. A visbility of `public` equates to a preset of
`public_chat` and `private` visibility equates to a preset of
`private_chat`.
is_direct:

@ -39,7 +39,7 @@ paths:
In v1.7 of the specification, transmission of the generated token to an unauthenticated client is
left as an implementation detail. Future MSCs such as [MSC3906](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-spec-proposals/pull/3906)
might standardise a way to transmit the token between clients.
might standarise a way to transmit the token between clients.
The generated token MUST only be valid for a single login, enforced by the server. Clients which
intend to log in multiple devices must generate a token for each.

@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ paths:
exception of the response format being fixed.
This endpoint is preferred over the v1 API as it provides
a more standardised response format. Senders which receive
a more standarised response format. Senders which receive
a 400, 404, or other status code which indicates this endpoint
is not available should retry using the v1 API instead.

@ -27,7 +27,7 @@ paths:
exception of the response format being fixed.
This endpoint is preferred over the v1 API as it provides
a more standardised response format. Senders which receive
a more standarised response format. Senders which receive
a 400, 404, or other status code which indicates this endpoint
is not available should retry using the v1 API instead.

@ -191,4 +191,4 @@ Describing grammar
Use `RFC5234-style ABNF <https://datatracker.ietf.org/doc/html/rfc5234>`_ when describing
the grammar for something in the spec, such as user IDs or server names. Use lowercase
and underscore-delimited element names (`user_id`, not `UserID` or `user-id`).
and underscore-deliminated element names (`user_id`, not `UserID` or `user-id`).

@ -31,7 +31,7 @@ day until the release has actually happened & blog post published.
Once a release is scheduled, the SCT will begin planning what the next release is
expected to look like. The plan should be included in the spec release blog post,
and be ready for execution on spec release day. Plans are guides and not promises.
and be ready for exeuction on spec release day. Plans are guides and not promises.
A blog post for the SCT members to review should be ready at minimum 1 week before
the target release date. 1-2 days before the release itself, the prerequisite steps

Loading…
Cancel
Save