Merge pull request #2737 from matrix-org/revert-2033-travis/msc/whoami-device
Revert "MSC2033: Adding a device_id to /account/whoami"pull/977/head
commit
a4b5ec8fec
@ -1,30 +0,0 @@
|
||||
# Proposal to include device IDs in `/account/whoami`
|
||||
|
||||
There are some use cases (namely using
|
||||
[Pantalaimon with bots](https://github.com/matrix-org/pantalaimon/issues/14))
|
||||
which could benefit from knowing the `device_id` associated with a token.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Proposal
|
||||
|
||||
The `/account/whoami` endpoint receives an additional response field for the `device_id`
|
||||
associated with the access token. The field is optional because appservice users may not
|
||||
have a real device associated with them. Non-appservice users should always have a device
|
||||
associated with them.
|
||||
|
||||
Access tokens are already associated with at most 1 device, and devices are associated with
|
||||
exactly 1 access token. Because of this, we do not need to worry about multiple devices
|
||||
causing problems. For more information, see
|
||||
https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.4.0.html#relationship-between-access-tokens-and-devices
|
||||
|
||||
*Note*: Pantalaimon would likely require a `device_id` be returned and error requests
|
||||
otherwise. This should be considered expected behaviour by Pantalaimon in the MSC author's
|
||||
opinion.
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
## Tradeoffs
|
||||
|
||||
We could introduce a `/device/whoami` endpoint, however that is a less superior option. Most
|
||||
calls to `/device/whoami` would additionally need to call `/account/whoami` to determine the
|
||||
user ID of the account. We had might as well bundle the two pieces of information into the
|
||||
same request.
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue