|
|
|
@ -0,0 +1,155 @@
|
|
|
|
|
# Improving the way membership lists are queried
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Problem scope
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A common operation for bots, bridges, scripts, and clients is to determine what rooms the user is a
|
|
|
|
|
member of and who the members of those rooms are. Although possible with the current specification,
|
|
|
|
|
the API can be improved to provide more granular and simplified access to this information.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The affected routes are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* `GET /_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{roomId}/members`
|
|
|
|
|
* `GET /_matrix/client/r0/rooms/{roomId}/joined_members`
|
|
|
|
|
* `GET /_matrix/client/r0/joined_rooms`
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This proposal aims to resolve [matrix-doc#1123](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1123).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Background
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The `/joined_members` and `/joined_rooms` endpoints were originally added in [synapse#1680](https://github.com/matrix-org/synapse/pull/1680)
|
|
|
|
|
during a time when the IRC bridge on matrix.org was under extreme load. The endpoints were fully
|
|
|
|
|
intended to alleviate load by having the bridge do less work and have the server doing more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Proposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This proposal calls for both `/joined_members` and `/joined_rooms` to be deprecated. The
|
|
|
|
|
deprecation is to be coupled with improving how `/members` works and introducing a new `/rooms`
|
|
|
|
|
endpoint, which will work in a very similar way to the updated `/members` endpoint. Both endpoints
|
|
|
|
|
are proposed to get some way to filter based upon membership, as outlined in the options below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Option 1: Query string
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
A new query parameter, `membership`, should be added to the `/members` endpoint. The parameter
|
|
|
|
|
filters the membership list of the room such that only members with a matching `membership` are
|
|
|
|
|
returned. The parameter can be supplied multiple times to filter on multiple membership states. For
|
|
|
|
|
example, the request could be `/members?membership=join&membership=invite` to get all invited and
|
|
|
|
|
joined members for the room. If no `membership` parameter is specified, the default is to return
|
|
|
|
|
all members of the room regardless of membership state.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To compliment the `/members` endpoint, a new endpoint should be added to query the rooms for the
|
|
|
|
|
user. This uses the same style of using a membership query parameter to filter the rooms.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Some examples of using this endpoint are below. The `rooms` field is an object where the key is a
|
|
|
|
|
room ID and the value is information about that room, currently storing a single `membership`
|
|
|
|
|
field. The value is an object to support future expansion of this API.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```json5
|
|
|
|
|
// GET /_matrix/client/r0/rooms?membership=join&membership=invite
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"rooms": {
|
|
|
|
|
"!somewhere:domain.com": {
|
|
|
|
|
"membership": "join"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
"!elsewhere:matrix.org": {
|
|
|
|
|
"membership": "invite"
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```json5
|
|
|
|
|
// GET /_matrix/client/r0/rooms?membership=ban
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"rooms": {
|
|
|
|
|
"!plzno:domain.com": {
|
|
|
|
|
"membership": "ban"
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```json5
|
|
|
|
|
// GET /_matrix/client/r0/rooms
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"rooms": {
|
|
|
|
|
"!somewhere:domain.com": {
|
|
|
|
|
"membership": "join"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
"!elsewhere:matrix.org": {
|
|
|
|
|
"membership": "invite"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
"!plzno:domain.com": {
|
|
|
|
|
"membership": "ban"
|
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
"!curbaf:domain.com": {
|
|
|
|
|
"membership": "leave"
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Option 2: Filter
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As with Option 1, a new endpoint would be added to handle getting the list of rooms. However, instead of both `/members` and `/rooms` taking a query parameter for membership they would instead take a filter (re-using existing matrix concepts). Similar to how `/messages` works, this filter would be a `RoomEventFilter` instead of having all the available options. Additionally, the filter would support a `membership` field to filter based upon membership.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
An example filter for getting members/rooms of membership `invite` or `join` would be:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```json5
|
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
|
"limit": 5, // The maximum number of items to return. Defaults to no limit.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// These only apply when fetching members in a room
|
|
|
|
|
"senders": ["*"],
|
|
|
|
|
"not_senders": [],
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// These only apply when fetching rooms
|
|
|
|
|
"rooms": ["*"],
|
|
|
|
|
"not_rooms": [],
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// NEW! Filter based upon the given membership values.
|
|
|
|
|
"membership": ["join", "invite"],
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// These are copied from the RoomEventFilter schema, but are ignored
|
|
|
|
|
"types": [],
|
|
|
|
|
"not_types": [],
|
|
|
|
|
"contains_url": true,
|
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Option 3: Even more filters
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Expanding on Option 2, we give `/state` the option of a filter (also from Option 2). This would
|
|
|
|
|
require the `types` to be useful, and we could potentially deprecate the `/members` endpoint
|
|
|
|
|
entirely with this approach.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Likewise, `/context` should take a similar filter so clients can get members at a given point in
|
|
|
|
|
history.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Alternative solutions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Using ?membership=join,invite or ?membership=join+invite instead
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The arguments in favour of this approach are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* It doesn’t rely on undefined behaviour in RFC3986
|
|
|
|
|
* Using multiple keys in the query string hasn’t been done before in the matrix spec
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The arguments against this approach are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* It’s not as pretty and may require hex encoding
|
|
|
|
|
* It adds unnecessary complexity given most query string parsers are capable of handling multiple
|
|
|
|
|
keys in the query string. It is additional complexity because implementations would now need to
|
|
|
|
|
do string splitting instead of relying on their already-in-use parsing libraries
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Encoding ?membership as a JSON value
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The arguments in favour of this approach are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* The filtering API already does this
|
|
|
|
|
* It doesn’t rely on undefined behaviour in RFC3986
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The arguments against this approach are:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
* It’s not as pretty and requires hex encoding
|
|
|
|
|
* Implementations would be forced to perform decoding, adding additional complexity (see the con
|
|
|
|
|
for comma-separated values)
|