From 8a3e7b751ce6591216d710c3ad642c807240340e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Erik Johnston Date: Tue, 11 Dec 2018 10:33:02 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Add missing apostrophe --- proposals/1442-state-resolution.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/proposals/1442-state-resolution.md b/proposals/1442-state-resolution.md index b50612ee..f90533f8 100644 --- a/proposals/1442-state-resolution.md +++ b/proposals/1442-state-resolution.md @@ -464,7 +464,7 @@ disagreeing on who is in the room. Intuitively using rejected events feels dangerous, however: 1. Servers cannot arbitrarily make up state, since they still need to pass the - auth checks based on the events auth chain (e.g. they can't grant themselves + auth checks based on the event's auth chain (e.g. they can't grant themselves power levels if they didn't have them before). 2. For a previously rejected event to pass auth there must be a set of state that allows said event. A malicious server could therefore produce a