|
|
|
@ -393,7 +393,7 @@ The process for an implementation willing to be ahead of a spec release is:
|
|
|
|
|
to provide forwards/backwards compatibility - e.g. a user authentication change
|
|
|
|
|
which can't be safely rolled back), the implementation should not attempt to
|
|
|
|
|
implement the feature and should instead wait for a spec release.
|
|
|
|
|
* If at any point the idea changes, the feature flag should also change so that
|
|
|
|
|
* If at any point after early release, the idea changes in a backwards-incompatible way, the feature flag should also change so that
|
|
|
|
|
implementations can adapt as needed.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
3. In parallel, or ahead of implementation, open an MSC and solicit review per above.
|
|
|
|
|