From 52dfaaabd416f8fb9ca98361a31aa74cf7abf76c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Richard van der Hoff <1389908+richvdh@users.noreply.github.com> Date: Tue, 23 Mar 2021 11:40:56 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] Update proposals/2801-untrusted-event-data.md Co-authored-by: Jonathan de Jong --- proposals/2801-untrusted-event-data.md | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/proposals/2801-untrusted-event-data.md b/proposals/2801-untrusted-event-data.md index 31e6d539..2b0d16aa 100644 --- a/proposals/2801-untrusted-event-data.md +++ b/proposals/2801-untrusted-event-data.md @@ -109,7 +109,7 @@ events sent over federation; in particular, if subsets of the servers in a room have different ideas as to which events are "valid", then their concepts of the room state can begin to drift, and the room can eventually become "split-brained". This makes it hard to simply say, for example, -"`m.room.member` events with a non-string `displayname` are invald and should +"`m.room.member` events with a non-string `displayname` are invalid and should not form part of the room state": we have a risk that some servers will accept the event, and some will not.