You cannot select more than 25 topics
Topics must start with a letter or number, can include dashes ('-') and can be up to 35 characters long.
407 lines
14 KiB
ReStructuredText
407 lines
14 KiB
ReStructuredText
10 years ago
|
Application Service API
|
||
|
=======================
|
||
|
|
||
10 years ago
|
The Matrix client-server API and server-server APIs provide the means to
|
||
|
implement a consistent self-contained federated messaging fabric. However, they
|
||
|
provide limited means of implementing custom server-side behaviour in Matrix
|
||
9 years ago
|
(e.g. gateways, filters, extensible hooks etc). The Application Service API
|
||
|
defines a standard API to allow such extensible functionality to be implemented
|
||
|
irrespective of the underlying homeserver implementation.
|
||
10 years ago
|
|
||
|
.. TODO-spec
|
||
10 years ago
|
Add in Client-Server services? Overview of bots? Seems weird to be in the spec
|
||
|
given it is VERY implementation specific.
|
||
10 years ago
|
|
||
|
Passive Application Services
|
||
|
----------------------------
|
||
9 years ago
|
"Passive" application services can only observe events from a given home server,
|
||
|
and inject events into a room they are participating in.
|
||
10 years ago
|
They cannot prevent events from being sent, nor can they modify the content of
|
||
9 years ago
|
the event being sent. In order to observe events from a homeserver, the
|
||
|
homeserver needs to be configured to pass certain types of traffic to the
|
||
|
application service. This is achieved by manually configuring the homeserver
|
||
|
with information about the AS.
|
||
10 years ago
|
|
||
|
.. NOTE::
|
||
|
Previously, application services could register with a homeserver via HTTP
|
||
|
APIs. This was removed as it was seen as a security risk. A compromised
|
||
|
application service could re-register for a global ``*`` regex and sniff
|
||
|
*all* traffic on the homeserver. To protect against this, application
|
||
|
services now have to register via configuration files which are linked to
|
||
|
the homeserver configuration file. The addition of configuration files
|
||
|
allows homeserver admins to sanity check the registration for suspicious
|
||
|
regex strings.
|
||
10 years ago
|
|
||
|
.. TODO
|
||
|
Removing the API entirely is probably a mistake - having a standard cross-HS
|
||
|
way of doing this stops ASes being coupled to particular HS implementations.
|
||
|
A better solution would be to somehow mandate that the API done to avoid
|
||
|
abuse.
|
||
|
|
||
|
An example HS configuration required to pass traffic to the AS is:
|
||
|
|
||
|
.. code-block:: yaml
|
||
|
|
||
|
url: <base url of AS>
|
||
|
as_token: <token AS will add to requests to HS>
|
||
|
hs_token: <token HS will add to requests to AS>
|
||
|
sender_localpart: <localpart of AS user>
|
||
|
namespaces:
|
||
|
users: # Namespaces of users which should be delegated to the AS
|
||
|
- exclusive: <bool>
|
||
|
regex: <regex>
|
||
|
- ...
|
||
|
aliases: [] # Namespaces of room aliases which should be delegated to the AS
|
||
|
rooms: [] # Namespaces of room ids which should be delegated to the AS
|
||
10 years ago
|
|
||
9 years ago
|
.. WARNING::
|
||
|
If the homeserver in question has multiple application services, each
|
||
|
``as_token`` MUST be unique per application service as this token is used to
|
||
9 years ago
|
identify the application service. The homeserver MUST enforce this.
|
||
9 years ago
|
|
||
10 years ago
|
- An application service can state whether they should be the only ones who
|
||
|
can manage a specified namespace. This is referred to as an "exclusive"
|
||
|
namespace. An exclusive namespace prevents humans and other application
|
||
|
services from creating/deleting entities in that namespace. Typically,
|
||
|
exclusive namespaces are used when the rooms represent real rooms on
|
||
|
another service (e.g. IRC). Non-exclusive namespaces are used when the
|
||
|
application service is merely augmenting the room itself (e.g. providing
|
||
|
logging or searching facilities).
|
||
|
- Namespaces are represented by POSIX extended regular expressions,
|
||
9 years ago
|
e.g:
|
||
10 years ago
|
|
||
10 years ago
|
.. code-block:: yaml
|
||
10 years ago
|
|
||
10 years ago
|
users:
|
||
10 years ago
|
- exclusive: true
|
||
9 years ago
|
regex: @irc.freenode.net_.*
|
||
10 years ago
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Home Server -> Application Service API
|
||
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||
|
This contains application service APIs which are used by the home server. All
|
||
|
application services MUST implement these APIs.
|
||
|
|
||
|
User Query
|
||
|
++++++++++
|
||
|
|
||
|
This API is called by the HS to query the existence of a user on the Application
|
||
|
Service's namespace.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Inputs:
|
||
|
- User ID
|
||
|
- HS Credentials
|
||
|
Output:
|
||
|
- Whether the user exists.
|
||
|
Side effects:
|
||
|
- User is created on the HS by the AS via CS APIs during the processing of this request.
|
||
|
API called when:
|
||
|
- HS receives an event for an unknown user ID in the AS's namespace, e.g. an
|
||
|
invite event to a room.
|
||
|
Notes:
|
||
|
- When the AS receives this request, if the user exists, it must create the user via
|
||
|
the CS API.
|
||
|
- It can also set arbitrary information about the user (e.g. display name, join rooms, etc)
|
||
|
using the CS API.
|
||
|
- When this setup is complete, the AS should respond to the HS request. This means the AS
|
||
|
blocks the HS until the user is created.
|
||
|
- This is deemed more flexible than alternative methods (e.g. returning a JSON blob with the
|
||
|
user's display name and get the HS to provision the user).
|
||
|
Retry notes:
|
||
|
- The home server cannot respond to the client's request until the response to
|
||
|
this API is obtained from the AS.
|
||
|
- Recommended that home servers try a few times then time out, returning a
|
||
|
408 Request Timeout to the client.
|
||
|
|
||
|
::
|
||
|
|
||
|
GET /users/$user_id?access_token=$hs_token
|
||
|
|
||
|
Returns:
|
||
|
200 : User is recognised.
|
||
|
404 : User not found.
|
||
|
401 : Credentials need to be supplied.
|
||
|
403 : HS credentials rejected.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
200 OK response format
|
||
|
|
||
|
{}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Room Alias Query
|
||
|
++++++++++++++++
|
||
|
This API is called by the HS to query the existence of a room alias on the
|
||
|
Application Service's namespace.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Inputs:
|
||
|
- Room alias
|
||
|
- HS Credentials
|
||
|
Output:
|
||
|
- Whether the room exists.
|
||
|
Side effects:
|
||
|
- Room is created on the HS by the AS via CS APIs during the processing of
|
||
|
this request.
|
||
|
API called when:
|
||
|
- HS receives an event to join a room alias in the AS's namespace.
|
||
|
Notes:
|
||
|
- When the AS receives this request, if the room exists, it must create the room via
|
||
|
the CS API.
|
||
|
- It can also set arbitrary information about the room (e.g. name, topic, etc)
|
||
|
using the CS API.
|
||
|
- It can send messages as other users in order to populate scrollback.
|
||
|
- When this setup is complete, the AS should respond to the HS request. This means the AS
|
||
|
blocks the HS until the room is created and configured.
|
||
|
- This is deemed more flexible than alternative methods (e.g. returning an initial sync
|
||
|
style JSON blob and get the HS to provision the room). It also means that the AS knows
|
||
|
the room ID -> alias mapping.
|
||
|
Retry notes:
|
||
|
- The home server cannot respond to the client's request until the response to
|
||
|
this API is obtained from the AS.
|
||
|
- Recommended that home servers try a few times then time out, returning a
|
||
|
408 Request Timeout to the client.
|
||
|
|
||
|
::
|
||
|
|
||
|
GET /rooms/$room_alias?access_token=$hs_token
|
||
|
|
||
|
Returns:
|
||
|
200 : Room is recognised.
|
||
|
404 : Room not found.
|
||
|
401 : Credentials need to be supplied.
|
||
|
403 : HS credentials rejected.
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
200 OK response format
|
||
|
|
||
|
{}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Pushing
|
||
|
+++++++
|
||
|
This API is called by the HS when the HS wants to push an event (or batch of
|
||
|
events) to the AS.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Inputs:
|
||
|
- HS Credentials
|
||
|
- Event(s) to give to the AS
|
||
|
- HS-generated transaction ID
|
||
|
Output:
|
||
|
- None.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Data flows:
|
||
|
|
||
|
::
|
||
|
|
||
|
Typical
|
||
|
HS ---> AS : Home server sends events with transaction ID T.
|
||
|
<--- : AS sends back 200 OK.
|
||
|
|
||
|
AS ACK Lost
|
||
|
HS ---> AS : Home server sends events with transaction ID T.
|
||
|
<-/- : AS 200 OK is lost.
|
||
|
HS ---> AS : Home server retries with the same transaction ID of T.
|
||
|
<--- : AS sends back 200 OK. If the AS had processed these events
|
||
|
already, it can NO-OP this request (and it knows if it is the same
|
||
|
events based on the transacton ID).
|
||
|
|
||
|
|
||
|
Retry notes:
|
||
|
- If the HS fails to pass on the events to the AS, it must retry the request.
|
||
|
- Since ASes by definition cannot alter the traffic being passed to it (unlike
|
||
|
say, a Policy Server), these requests can be done in parallel to general HS
|
||
|
processing; the HS doesn't need to block whilst doing this.
|
||
|
- Home servers should use exponential backoff as their retry algorithm.
|
||
|
- Home servers MUST NOT alter (e.g. add more) events they were going to
|
||
|
send within that transaction ID on retries, as the AS may have already
|
||
|
processed the events.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Ordering notes:
|
||
|
- The events sent to the AS should be linearised, as they are from the event
|
||
|
stream.
|
||
|
- The home server will need to maintain a queue of transactions to send to
|
||
|
the AS.
|
||
|
|
||
|
::
|
||
|
|
||
|
PUT /transactions/$transaction_id?access_token=$hs_token
|
||
|
|
||
|
Request format
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
events: [
|
||
|
...
|
||
|
]
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Client-Server v2 API Extensions
|
||
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||
|
|
||
|
Passive application services can utilise a more powerful version of the
|
||
|
client-server API by identifying itself as an application service to the
|
||
|
home server.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Identity assertion
|
||
|
++++++++++++++++++
|
||
|
The client-server API infers the user ID from the ``access_token`` provided in
|
||
|
every request. It would be an annoying amount of book-keeping to maintain tokens
|
||
|
for every virtual user. It would be preferable if the application service could
|
||
|
use the CS API with its own ``as_token`` instead, and specify the virtual user
|
||
|
they wish to be acting on behalf of. For real users, this would require
|
||
|
additional permissions granting the AS permission to masquerade as a matrix user.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Inputs:
|
||
|
- Application service token (``access_token``)
|
||
|
|
||
|
Either:
|
||
|
- User ID in the AS namespace to act as.
|
||
|
Or:
|
||
|
- OAuth2 token of real user (which may end up being an access token)
|
||
|
Notes:
|
||
|
- This will apply on all aspects of the CS API, except for Account Management.
|
||
|
- The ``as_token`` is inserted into ``access_token`` which is usually where the
|
||
|
client token is. This is done on purpose to allow application services to
|
||
|
reuse client SDKs.
|
||
|
|
||
|
::
|
||
|
|
||
|
/path?access_token=$token&user_id=$userid
|
||
|
|
||
|
Query Parameters:
|
||
|
access_token: The application service token
|
||
|
user_id: The desired user ID to act as.
|
||
|
|
||
|
/path?access_token=$token&user_token=$token
|
||
|
|
||
|
Query Parameters:
|
||
|
access_token: The application service token
|
||
|
user_token: The token granted to the AS by the real user
|
||
|
|
||
|
Timestamp massaging
|
||
|
+++++++++++++++++++
|
||
|
The application service may want to inject events at a certain time (reflecting
|
||
|
the time on the network they are tracking e.g. irc, xmpp). Application services
|
||
|
need to be able to adjust the ``origin_server_ts`` value to do this.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Inputs:
|
||
|
- Application service token (``as_token``)
|
||
|
- Desired timestamp
|
||
|
Notes:
|
||
|
- This will only apply when sending events.
|
||
|
|
||
|
::
|
||
|
|
||
|
/path?access_token=$token&ts=$timestamp
|
||
|
|
||
|
Query Parameters added to the send event APIs only:
|
||
|
access_token: The application service token
|
||
|
ts: The desired timestamp
|
||
|
|
||
|
Server admin style permissions
|
||
|
++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
|
||
|
The home server needs to give the application service *full control* over its
|
||
|
namespace, both for users and for room aliases. This means that the AS should
|
||
|
be able to create/edit/delete any room alias in its namespace, as well as
|
||
|
create/delete any user in its namespace. No additional API changes need to be
|
||
|
made in order for control of room aliases to be granted to the AS. Creation of
|
||
|
users needs API changes in order to:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Work around captchas.
|
||
|
- Have a 'passwordless' user.
|
||
|
|
||
|
This involves bypassing the registration flows entirely. This is achieved by
|
||
|
including the AS token on a ``/register`` request, along with a login type of
|
||
|
``m.login.application_service`` to set the desired user ID without a password.
|
||
|
|
||
|
::
|
||
|
|
||
|
/register?access_token=$as_token
|
||
|
|
||
|
Content:
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
type: "m.login.application_service",
|
||
|
user: "<desired user localpart in AS namespace>"
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Application services which attempt to create users or aliases *outside* of
|
||
|
their defined namespaces will receive an error code ``M_EXCLUSIVE``. Similarly,
|
||
9 years ago
|
normal users who attempt to create users or aliases *inside* an application
|
||
10 years ago
|
service-defined namespace will receive the same ``M_EXCLUSIVE`` error code,
|
||
|
but only if the application service has defined the namespace as ``exclusive``.
|
||
|
|
||
|
ID conventions
|
||
|
~~~~~~~~~~~~~~
|
||
9 years ago
|
.. TODO-spec
|
||
10 years ago
|
- Giving HSes the freedom to namespace still feels like the Right Thing here.
|
||
|
- Exposing a public API provides the consistency which was the main complaint
|
||
|
against namespacing.
|
||
|
- This may have knock-on effects for the AS registration API. E.g. why don't
|
||
|
we let ASes specify the *URI* regex they want?
|
||
|
|
||
|
This concerns the well-defined conventions for mapping 3P network IDs to matrix
|
||
|
IDs, which we expect clients to be able to do by themselves.
|
||
|
|
||
|
User IDs
|
||
|
++++++++
|
||
|
Matrix users may wish to directly contact a virtual user, e.g. to send an email.
|
||
|
The URI format is a well-structured way to represent a number of different ID
|
||
|
types, including:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- MSISDNs (``tel``)
|
||
|
- Email addresses (``mailto``)
|
||
|
- IRC nicks (``irc`` - https://tools.ietf.org/html/draft-butcher-irc-url-04)
|
||
9 years ago
|
- XMPP (XEP-0032)
|
||
10 years ago
|
- SIP URIs (RFC 3261)
|
||
|
|
||
|
As a result, virtual user IDs SHOULD relate to their URI counterpart. This
|
||
|
mapping from URI to user ID can be expressed in a number of ways:
|
||
|
|
||
|
- Expose a C-S API on the HS which takes URIs and responds with user IDs.
|
||
|
- Munge the URI with the user ID.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Exposing an API would allow HSes to internally map user IDs however they like,
|
||
|
at the cost of an extra round trip (of which the response can be cached).
|
||
|
Munging the URI would allow clients to apply the mapping locally, but would force
|
||
|
user X on service Y to always map to the same munged user ID. Considering the
|
||
|
exposed API could just be applying this munging, there is more flexibility if
|
||
|
an API is exposed.
|
||
|
|
||
|
::
|
||
|
|
||
|
GET /_matrix/app/v1/user?uri=$url_encoded_uri
|
||
|
|
||
|
Returns 200 OK:
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
user_id: <complete user ID on local HS>
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Room Aliases
|
||
|
++++++++++++
|
||
|
We may want to expose some 3P network rooms so Matrix users can join them directly,
|
||
9 years ago
|
e.g. IRC rooms. We don't want to expose every 3P network room though, e.g.
|
||
|
``mailto``, ``tel``. Rooms which are publicly accessible (e.g. IRC rooms) can be
|
||
|
exposed as an alias by the application service. Private rooms
|
||
|
(e.g. sending an email to someone) should not
|
||
10 years ago
|
be exposed in this way, but should instead operate using normal invite/join semantics.
|
||
|
Therefore, the ID conventions discussed below are only valid for public rooms which
|
||
|
expose room aliases.
|
||
|
|
||
|
Matrix users may wish to join XMPP rooms (e.g. using XEP-0045) or IRC rooms. In both
|
||
|
cases, these rooms can be expressed as URIs. For consistency, these "room" URIs
|
||
|
SHOULD be mapped in the same way as "user" URIs.
|
||
|
|
||
|
::
|
||
|
|
||
|
GET /_matrix/app/v1/alias?uri=$url_encoded_uri
|
||
|
|
||
|
Returns 200 OK:
|
||
|
{
|
||
|
alias: <complete room alias on local HS>
|
||
|
}
|
||
|
|
||
|
Event fields
|
||
|
++++++++++++
|
||
9 years ago
|
We recommend that any events that originated from a remote network should
|
||
|
include an ``external_url`` field in their content to provide a way for Matrix
|
||
|
clients to link into the 'native' client from which the event originated.
|
||
|
For instance, this could contain the message-ID for emails/nntp posts, or a link
|
||
|
to a blog comment when bridging blog comment traffic in & out of Matrix.
|
||
9 years ago
|
|