|
|
|
# Remove references to presence lists
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
[Presence](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.4.0.html#id107) lists
|
|
|
|
allow a given user the ability to subscribe to other users and be alerted to
|
|
|
|
their current presence status.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
While spec'd, no established client has implemented support and the only server
|
|
|
|
side implementation raises privacy concerns.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The proposal is to simply remove references to presence lists with a view to
|
|
|
|
revisiting the same ideas in the future.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This MSC addresses
|
|
|
|
[#1810](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/issues/1810)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Proposal
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Presence lists seem like a good fit for ['MSC1769: Extensible profiles as
|
|
|
|
rooms'](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/1769) proposal, meaning
|
|
|
|
that the current design will most likely be superceded.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Additionally, no major client has implemented the behaviour to date and the
|
|
|
|
only server implementation of presence lists (Synapse) auto-accepts invites
|
|
|
|
leading to privacy concerns in the wild.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
With this in mind the most pragmatic solution is to remove presence lists ahead
|
|
|
|
of the r0 release.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Specifically:-
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
CS API: Remove
|
|
|
|
* [POST
|
|
|
|
/_matrix/client/r0/presence/list/{userId}](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.4.0.html#post-matrix-client-r0-presence-list-userid)
|
|
|
|
* [GET
|
|
|
|
/_matrix/client/r0/presence/list/{userId}](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.4.0.html#get-matrix-client-r0-presence-list-userid)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
SS API: Remove
|
|
|
|
* [m.presence_invite](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/server_server/unstable.html#m-presence-invite-schema)
|
|
|
|
* [m.presence_accept](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/server_server/unstable.html#m-presence-accept-schema)
|
|
|
|
* [m.presence_deny](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/server_server/unstable.html#m-presence-deny-schema)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Tradeoffs
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Ideally this proposal would also come with an alternative design for this
|
|
|
|
functionality. Out of pragmatism the proposal only covers removal of what is
|
|
|
|
there today.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Conclusions
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This is a common sense attempt to remove unused portions of the spec ahead of
|
|
|
|
an r0 release. It does not suggest that the ability to subscribe to the
|
|
|
|
presence of others is undesirable and assumes that this behvaiour will return
|
|
|
|
again in some form.
|