|
|
|
# MSC 2010: Proposal to add client-side spoilers
|
|
|
|
Sometimes, while you want to put text into a spoiler to not have people accidentally read things that they don't want to see.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For example, when discussing a new movie or a TV series, not everyone might have watched it yet.
|
|
|
|
In such cases it would make sense to add a spoiler so that only those who have seen the movie or
|
|
|
|
don't mind spoilers read the content.
|
|
|
|
Another example would be e.g. in mental health communities where certain people have certain
|
|
|
|
triggers. People could put talking about abuse or the like into a spoiler, to not accidentally
|
|
|
|
trigger anyone just reading along the conversation.
|
|
|
|
Furthermore this is helpful for bridging to other networks that already have a spoiler feature.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To render the spoiler the content is hidden and then revealed once interacted somehow
|
|
|
|
(e.g. a click / hover).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Proposal
|
|
|
|
This proposal is about adding a new attribute to the `formatted_body` of messages with type
|
|
|
|
`m.room.message` and message types which support the `org.matrix.custom.html` format.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
It adds a new attribute, `data-mx-spoiler`, to the `<span>` tag. If the attribute is present the
|
|
|
|
contents of the span tag should be rendered as a spoiler. Optionally, you can specify a reason for
|
|
|
|
the spoiler by setting the attribute string. It could be rendered, for example, similar to this:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
![Spoiler rendering idea](images/2010-spoiler-example.gif)
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The plaintext fallback supported by the `body` is optional. A recommendation for clients is included
|
|
|
|
below.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To preserve the semantics of a spoiler in the plaintext fallback it is recommended to upload the contents of the spoiler
|
|
|
|
as a text file and then link this: `[Spoiler](mxc://someserver/somefile)` and
|
|
|
|
`[Spoiler for reason](mxc://someserver/somefile)` respectively.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Example
|
|
|
|
Without reason:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
"msgtype": "m.text",
|
|
|
|
"format": "org.matrix.custom.html",
|
|
|
|
"body": "Hello there, the movie was [spoiler](mxc://someserver/somefile)",
|
|
|
|
"formatted_body": "Hello there, the movie was <span data-mx-spoiler>awesome</span>"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
With reason:
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
"msgtype": "m.text",
|
|
|
|
"format": "org.matrix.custom.html",
|
|
|
|
"body": "Hey [Spoiler for movie](mxc://someserver/somefile)",
|
|
|
|
"formatted_body": "Hey <span data-mx-spoiler="movie">the movie was awesome</span>"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Tradeoffs
|
|
|
|
Instead of making this an attribute, an entirely new tag could be introduced (e.g. `<mx-spoiler>`),
|
|
|
|
however that wouldn't be HTML-compliant.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Instead of limiting the proposed `data-mx-spoiler` attribute only to the `<span>`-tag it could be
|
|
|
|
added to all tags, however it might make implementations for clients more complicated.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Alternatively the [details](https://developer.mozilla.org/en-US/docs/Web/HTML/Element/details) tag could
|
|
|
|
be used. This, however, is a block element, and the spoilers are span elements. Furthermore
|
|
|
|
semantically there is a slight difference: with the details tag you hide something for a person
|
|
|
|
as it uses up a lot of screen space, while with a spoiler you hide something as a person might not
|
|
|
|
want to see it.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Potential issues
|
|
|
|
Depending on context it might make sense to put other events, such as `m.image`, into spoilers,
|
|
|
|
too. This MSC doesn't address that at all. Using
|
|
|
|
`<span data-mx-spoiler><img src="mxc://server/media"></span>` seems rather sub-optimal for that.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This MSC doesn't take HTML block elements into account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients would have to come up with a way to input spoilers. This could be done, for example,
|
|
|
|
by adding a custom markdown tag (like discord does), so that you do `Text ||spoiler||`, however
|
|
|
|
that doesn't take a spoiler reason into account.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
## Security considerations
|
|
|
|
The spoiler reason needs to be properly escaped when rendered.
|