|
|
|
|
|
|
|
### Threading
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{% added-in v="1.4" %}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threads allow users to visually branch their conversations in a room. Typically mostly used
|
|
|
|
when a room is discussing multiple topics, threads provide more organisation of communication
|
|
|
|
that traditional [rich replies](#rich-replies) can't always offer.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients SHOULD render threads differently to regular messages or replies in the timeline, such
|
|
|
|
as by providing some context to what is going on in the thread but keeping the full conversation
|
|
|
|
history behind a disclosure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Threads are established using a `rel_type` of `m.thread` and reference the
|
|
|
|
*thread root* (the main timeline event to which the thread events refer). It is not possible to create a thread from an event which itself
|
|
|
|
is the child of an event relationship (i.e., one with an `m.relates_to`
|
|
|
|
property with a `rel_type` property - see [Relationship types](#relationship-types)).
|
|
|
|
It is therefore also not possible to nest threads.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Unlike rich reply chains, all events in a thread reference the thread root
|
|
|
|
instead of the most recent message.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As a worked example, the following represents a thread and how it would be formed:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// irrelevant fields excluded
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.message",
|
|
|
|
"event_id": "$alice_hello",
|
|
|
|
"sender": "@alice:example.org",
|
|
|
|
"content": {
|
|
|
|
"msgtype": "m.text",
|
|
|
|
"body": "Hello world! How are you?"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// irrelevant fields excluded
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.message",
|
|
|
|
"event_id": "$bob_hello",
|
|
|
|
"sender": "@bob:example.org",
|
|
|
|
"content": {
|
|
|
|
"m.relates_to": {
|
|
|
|
"rel_type": "m.thread",
|
|
|
|
"event_id": "$alice_hello"
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
"msgtype": "m.text",
|
|
|
|
"body": "I'm doing okay, thank you! How about yourself?"
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
// irrelevant fields excluded
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.message",
|
|
|
|
"event_id": "$alice_reply",
|
|
|
|
"sender": "@alice:example.org",
|
|
|
|
"content": {
|
|
|
|
"m.relates_to": {
|
|
|
|
"rel_type": "m.thread",
|
|
|
|
"event_id": "$alice_hello" // note: always references the *thread root*
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
"msgtype": "m.text",
|
|
|
|
"body": "I'm doing great! Thanks for asking."
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As shown, any event without a `rel_type` can become a thread root by simply referencing it
|
|
|
|
using an `m.thread` relationship.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Fallback for unthreaded clients
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients which understand how to work with threads should simply do so, however clients which
|
|
|
|
might not be aware of threads (due to age or scope) might not be able to helpfully represent
|
|
|
|
the conversation history to its users.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To work around this, events sent by clients which understand threads SHOULD include [rich reply](#rich-replies)
|
|
|
|
metadata to attempt to form a reply chain representation of the conversation. This representation
|
|
|
|
is not ideal for heavily threaded rooms, but allows for users to have context as to what is
|
|
|
|
being discussed with respect to other messages in the room.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
This representation is achieved by merging the two relationships and setting a new `is_falling_back`
|
|
|
|
flag to `true`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
|
|
// within an event's content...
|
|
|
|
"m.relates_to": {
|
|
|
|
// The m.thread relationship structure
|
|
|
|
"rel_type": "m.thread",
|
|
|
|
"event_id": "$root",
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// The rich reply structure
|
|
|
|
"m.in_reply_to": {
|
|
|
|
// The most recent message known to the client in the thread.
|
|
|
|
// This should be something with a high chance of being rendered by the other client,
|
|
|
|
// such as an `m.room.message` event.
|
|
|
|
"event_id": "$target"
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
// A flag to denote that this is a thread with reply fallback
|
|
|
|
"is_falling_back": true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
For `m.room.message` events represented this way, no [reply fallback](#fallbacks-for-rich-replies)
|
|
|
|
is specified. This allows thread-aware clients to discard the `m.in_reply_to` object entirely
|
|
|
|
when `is_falling_back` is `true`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{% boxes/note %}}
|
|
|
|
Clients which are acutely aware of threads (they do not render threads, but are otherwise
|
|
|
|
aware of the feature existing in the spec) can treat rich replies to an event with a `rel_type`
|
|
|
|
of `m.thread` as a threaded reply, for conversation continuity on the threaded client's side.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
To do this, copy the `event_id` (thread root) from the event being replied to, add the
|
|
|
|
`m.in_reply_to` metadata, and add `is_falling_back: true` to `m.relates_to`.
|
|
|
|
{{% /boxes/note %}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Replies within threads
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
In the [fallback for unthreaded clients](#fallback-for-unthreaded-clients) section, a new
|
|
|
|
`is_falling_back` flag is added to `m.relates_to`. This flag defaults to `false` when not
|
|
|
|
provided, which also allows a threaded message to contain a reply itself.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Aside from `is_falling_back` being `false` (or not specified), the fallback for unthreaded
|
|
|
|
clients is used to create a reply within a thread: clients should render the event accordingly.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Server behaviour
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
##### Validation of `m.thread` relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Servers SHOULD reject client requests which attempt to start a thread off an
|
|
|
|
event with an `m.relates_to` property. If the client attempts to target an event which itself
|
|
|
|
has an `m.relates_to` property, then it should receive a HTTP 400 error
|
|
|
|
response with appropriate error message, as per the [standard error
|
|
|
|
response](#standard-error-response) structure.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{% boxes/note %}}
|
|
|
|
A specific error code is not currently available for this case: servers should use `M_UNKNOWN`
|
|
|
|
alongside the HTTP 400 status code.
|
|
|
|
{{% /boxes/note %}}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
##### Server-side aggregation of `m.thread` relationships
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Given threads always reference the thread root, an event can have multiple
|
|
|
|
"child" events which then form the thread itself. These events should be
|
|
|
|
[aggregated](#aggregations-of-child-events) by the server.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
The aggregation for threads includes some information about the user's participation in the thread,
|
|
|
|
the approximate number of events in the thread (as known to the server), and the most recent event
|
|
|
|
in the thread (topologically).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
As with any other aggregation of child events, the `m.thread` aggregation is
|
|
|
|
included under the `m.relations` property in `unsigned` for the thread root. For example:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
```json
|
|
|
|
{
|
|
|
|
"event_id": "$root_event",
|
|
|
|
// irrelevant fields not shown
|
|
|
|
"unsigned": {
|
|
|
|
"m.relations": {
|
|
|
|
"m.thread": {
|
|
|
|
"latest_event": {
|
|
|
|
// A serialized copy of the latest event in the thread.
|
|
|
|
// Some fields are not shown here for brevity.
|
|
|
|
"event_id": "$message",
|
|
|
|
"sender": "@alice:example.org",
|
|
|
|
"room_id": "!room:example.org",
|
|
|
|
"type": "m.room.message",
|
|
|
|
"content": {
|
|
|
|
"msgtype": "m.text",
|
|
|
|
"body": "Woo! Threads!"
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
"unsigned": {
|
|
|
|
"m.relations": {
|
|
|
|
// ...
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
},
|
|
|
|
"count": 7,
|
|
|
|
"current_user_participated": true
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
}
|
|
|
|
```
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`latest_event` is the most recent event (topologically to the server) in the thread sent by an
|
|
|
|
un-[ignored user](#ignoring-users).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Note that, as in the example above, child events of the `latest_event` should
|
|
|
|
themselves be aggregated and included under `m.relations` for that event. The
|
|
|
|
server should be careful to avoid loops, though loops are not currently
|
|
|
|
possible due to `m.thread` not being permitted to target an event with an
|
|
|
|
`m.relates_to` property.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`count` is simply the number of events using `m.thread` as a `rel_type` pointing to the target event.
|
|
|
|
It does not include events sent by [ignored users](#ignoring-users).
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
`current_user_participated` is `true` when the authenticated user is either:
|
|
|
|
1. The `sender` of the thread root event.
|
|
|
|
2. The `sender` of an event which references the thread root with a `rel_type` of `m.thread`.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
#### Querying threads in a room
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Clients looking to get all the events in a thread can use
|
|
|
|
[`GET /relations/{threadRootId}/m.thread`](#get_matrixclientv1roomsroomidrelationseventidreltype),
|
|
|
|
however getting all threads in a room is done through a dedicated API:
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
{{% http-api spec="client-server" api="threads_list" %}}
|