Merge pull request #2290 from matrix-org/anoa/msc_separate_hs_api

MSC2290: Separate Endpoints for Threepid Binding
travis/msc/integrations/select-none
Travis Ralston 5 years ago committed by GitHub
commit f608c48f8a
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 4AEE18F83AFDEB23

@ -1,5 +1,16 @@
# Allowing 3PID Owners to Rebind
## Note: This MSC has been made obsolete by MSC2290.
MSC2290 provides two separate API endpoints, one for adding a 3PID to the
homeserver, and another for binding to an identity server. These new
endpoints will allow the homeserver to enforce rules on emails that already
exist on the homeserver, only when modifying homeserver email, while only
needing to forward requests when binding to an identity server. This removes
the problem MSC2229 is trying to solve, and it is thus made obselete.
---
```
3PID
noun

@ -0,0 +1,223 @@
# Separate Endpoints for Binding Threepids
*Note: This MSC obsoletes
[MSC2229](https://github.com/matrix-org/matrix-doc/pull/2229), which dealt
with changing the rules of the `bind` flag on [POST
/account/3pid](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.5.0#post-matrix-client-r0-account-3pid).
That endpoint is being deprecated as part of this MSC, thus MSC2229 is no
longer relevant.*
On the Client Server API there is currently a single endpoint for binding a
threepid (an email or a phone number): [POST
/account/3pid](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.5.0#post-matrix-client-r0-account-3pid).
Depending on whether the `bind` flag is `true` or `false`, the threepid will
be bound to either a user's account on the homeserver, or both the homeserver
and an identity server. Note that we use the term `add` when talking about
adding a threepid to a homeserver, and `bind` when binding a threepid to an
identity server. This terminology will be used throughout the rest of this
proposal.
Typically, when using the `/account/3pid` endpoint, the identity server
handles the verification -- either by sending an email to an email address,
or a SMS message to a phone number. Once completed, the homeserver will check
with the identity server that verification had indeed happened, and if so,
the threepid would be either added to the homeserver, or added to the
homeserver and bound to the identity server simultaneously.
Now, consider the fact that the identity server used in this process is
provided by the user, using the endpoint's `id_server` parameter. If the user were
to supply a malicious identity server that would immediately answer "yes" to
any threepid validation, then the user could add any threepid to their
account on the homeserver (which is likely not something homeserver admins want).
To be clear, this is not a long-standing security issue. It is not a problem
in any released version of Synapse, as Synapse keeps a list of "trusted
identity servers" that acts a whitelist for what identity servers a user can
specify.
The concept of this whitelist is being removed in this MSC however, as part
of lessening the reliance of homeservers on identity servers. This cannot be
done while the homeserver is still trusting an identity server for validation
of threepids. If the endpoints are split, the homeserver will handle the
validation of threepids being added to user accounts, and identity servers
will validate threepids being bound to themselves.
## Proposal
To solve this problem, two new endpoints will be added to the Client Server
API: `POST /account/3pid/bind` and `POST /account/3pid/add`. Binding to an
identity server will require standard authentication, whereas adding a 3pid
to a user account will require [User-Interactive
Authentication](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.5.0#user-interactive-authentication-api).
The latter is to prevent someone from adding a 3pid (which can be used to
reset passwords) to someone who's left their account open on a public
computer, without needing their password to do so.
Both endpoints will be rate-limited. The request parameters of `POST
/account/3pid/bind` are the same as [POST
/account/3pid](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.5.0#post-matrix-client-r0-account-3pid),
minus the `bind` flag, and the contents of `three_pid_creds` have been
brought to the top level of the request body. The request parameters of `POST
/account/3pid/add` will simply consist of a JSON body containing
`client_secret` and `sid`.
The homeserver should prevent a threepid being added to a user's account if
it's already part of another user's account. However, the homeserver should not
check for existing threepids when binding to an identity server. Identity
servers do not enforce this requirement and neither should the proxying
homeserver.
An example of binding a threepid to an identity server with this new endpoint
is as follows:
First the client must request the threepid be validated by its chosen
identity server.
```
POST https://identity.server/_matrix/identity/v2/validate/email/requestToken
{
"client_secret": "don'tT3ll",
"email": "bob@example.com",
"send_attempt": 1
}
```
The identity server must send an email to the specified address, including a
link to a URL on the identity server which will accept the validation session
ID, the given client_secret, and a randomly-generated token.
Once an email has been sent, the user clicks the link in the email, which
notifies the identity server that the email has been verified.
Next, the client completes the bind by calling the new endpoint on the
homeserver:
```
POST https://home.server/_matrix/client/r0/account/3pid/bind
{
"id_server": "example.org",
"id_access_token": "abc123_OpaqueString",
"sid": "abc123987",
"client_secret": "don'tT3ll"
}
```
The homeserver will then make a bind request to the specified identity server
on behalf of the user. The homeserver will record if the bind was successful
and notify the user. The homeserver will remember this bind and the identity
server it occurred on so that it can perform an unbind later if the user
requests it or their account is deactivated.
The threepid has now been bound on the user's requested identity server
without causing that threepid to be used for password resets or any other
homeserver-related functions.
For completeness, here is an example of adding a threepid to the homeserver
only, using the `/account/3pid/add` endpoint:
The homeserver is validating the threepid in this instance, so the client
must use the `/requestToken` endpoint of the homeserver:
```
POST https://home.server/_matrix/client/r0/account/3pid/email/requestToken
{
"client_secret": "don'tT3ll",
"email": "bob@example.com",
"send_attempt": 1,
}
```
Here the homeserver must send an email to the specified address, including a
link to a URL on the homeserver which will accept the validation session ID,
the given client_secret, and a randomly-generated token.
Once an email has been sent, the user clicks the link in the email, which
notifies the homeserver that the threepid has been verified.
The client then sends a request to the endpoint on the homeserver to add
the threepid to a user's account.
```
POST https://home.server/_matrix/client/r0/account/3pid/add
{
"sid": "abc123987",
"client_secret": "don'tT3ll"
}
```
The homeserver checks the threepid validation session referred to by the
given ID and client_secret was validated, and if so adds the threepid to the
user's account.
To achieve the above flows, some changes need to be made to existing
endpoints. The [POST
/account/3pid](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.5.0#post-matrix-client-r0-account-3pid)
endpoint is deprecated as the two new endpoints replace its functionality.
The `bind` parameter is to be removed, with the endpoint functioning as if
`bind` was `false`. Allowing an endpoint to add a threepid to both the
identity server and homeserver at the same time requires one to trust the
other, which is the exact behaviour we're trying to eliminate. Doing this
also helps backward compatibility, as explained in [Backwards
compatibility](#backwards-compatibility).
Either the homeserver itself or a service that the homeserver delegates to
should be handling the sending of validation messages, not a user-provided
server. Any mention of the homeserver being able to proxy to an identity
server in the below endpoint descriptions:
* [POST /account/3pid/email/requestToken](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.5.0#post-matrix-client-r0-account-3pid-email-requesttoken)
* [POST /account/3pid/msisdn/requestToken](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.5.0#post-matrix-client-r0-account-3pid-msisdn-requesttoken)
* [POST /register/email/requestToken](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.5.0#post-matrix-client-r0-register-email-requesttoken)
* [POST /register/msisdn/requestToken](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.5.0#post-matrix-client-r0-register-msisdn-requesttoken)
* [POST /account/password/email/requestToken](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.5.0#post-matrix-client-r0-account-password-email-requesttoken)
* [POST /account/password/msisdn/requestToken](https://matrix.org/docs/spec/client_server/r0.5.0#post-matrix-client-r0-account-password-msisdn-requesttoken)
As well as the text "It is imperative that the homeserver keep a list of
trusted Identity Servers and only proxies to those that it trusts." is to be
removed from all parts of the spec, as the homeserver should no longer need
to trust any identity servers.
## Tradeoffs
One may question why clients don't just contact an identity server directly
to bind a threepid, bypassing the implications of binding through a
homeserver. While this will work, binds should still occur through a
homeserver such that the homeserver can keep track of which binds were made,
which is important when a user wishes to deactivate their account (and remove
all of their bindings made on different identity servers).
A verification could occur on an identity server, which could then tell the
homeserver that a validation happened, but then there are security
considerations about how to authenticate an identity server in that instance
(and prevent people pretending to be identity servers and telling homeservers
about hundreds of fake threepid additions to a user's account).
## Backwards compatibility
A new flag will be added to `/versions`' unstable_features section,
`m.separate_add_and_bind`. If this flag is present and set to `true`, then
clients should use the new API endpoints to carry out threepid adds and
binds. If this flag is not present or set to `false`, clients should use
`/account/3pid`, being aware that they can only bind threepids to the
homeserver, not the identity server.
Old matrix clients will continue to use the `/account/3pid` endpoint. This
MSC removes the `bind` parameter and forces `/account/3pid` calls to act as
if `bind` was set to `false`. Old clients will still be able to add 3pids to
the homeserver, but not bind to the identity server. New homeservers must
ignore any `id_server` information passed to this endpoint.
## Security considerations
Reducing the homeserver's trust in identity servers should be a boost to
security and improve decentralisation in the Matrix ecosystem to boot.
Some endpoints of the Client Server API allow a user to provide an
`id_server` parameter. Caution should be taken for homeserver developers to
stop using these user-provided identity servers for any sensitive tasks where
possible, such as password reset or account registration, if it removes the
concept of a trusted identity server list.
Loading…
Cancel
Save