From edaf3596f470323a66c74383afb70332d26c28d9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Matthew Hodgson Date: Sat, 12 Jan 2019 23:14:36 +0000 Subject: [PATCH] fix 'which features should go in the spec?' TODO and reword intro --- proposals/1779-open-governance.md | 16 ++++++---------- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/proposals/1779-open-governance.md b/proposals/1779-open-governance.md index 8834da303..9db96756e 100644 --- a/proposals/1779-open-governance.md +++ b/proposals/1779-open-governance.md @@ -1,11 +1,11 @@ # Proposal for Open Governance of Matrix.org -This whole document is a **work in progress** draft of a constitution proposal -for open governance for Matrix.org, and forms the basis of the first full -Articles of Association (AoA) for [The Matrix.org Foundation -C.I.C.](https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/11648710) - a non-profit legal -entity incorporated to act as the neutral guardian of the Matrix decentralised -communication standard on behalf of the whole Matrix community. +This whole document is the proposed constitution proposal for Matrix.org, and +will form the basis of the first full Articles of Association (AoA) for [The +Matrix.org Foundation +C.I.C.](https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/11648710) - a non-profit +legal entity incorporated to act as the neutral guardian of the Matrix +decentralised communication standard on behalf of the whole Matrix community. See https://matrix.org/blog/2018/10/29/introducing-the-matrix-org-foundation-part-1-of-2/ for more context. @@ -121,10 +121,6 @@ rather than closed deployments. For example, if WhatsApp adopted Matrix it wouldn’t be a complete win unless they openly federated with the rest of the Matrix network. -TODO: spell out when features should land in the spec, versus via -integration/widget or other non-core extension. e.g. should video conferencing -be in the spec itself, or done via Jitsi? - ### Values As Matrix evolves, it's critical that the Spec Core Team and Guardians are