From eda0e44655bed18e83e0b63742c06b9884f9ebe9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: henri2h Date: Tue, 11 Jan 2022 23:36:38 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] random thought on E2EE rooms --- .../MSCZZZZ-matrix-for-the-social-media-use-case.md | 9 +++++++++ 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+) diff --git a/proposals/MSCZZZZ-matrix-for-the-social-media-use-case.md b/proposals/MSCZZZZ-matrix-for-the-social-media-use-case.md index ac6ab8268..55d06e096 100644 --- a/proposals/MSCZZZZ-matrix-for-the-social-media-use-case.md +++ b/proposals/MSCZZZZ-matrix-for-the-social-media-use-case.md @@ -70,6 +70,15 @@ Used by a user to share content with his friends or the world. * Room visibility : public / private. Up to the user. * A user could have multiple of them +Small note about encryption: + +Clients should notify the user that encryption shouldn't be enabled on 'big room'. (1) +On a side note, end-to-end encrypted rooms with a very large number of 'followers' +don't make a lot of change. + +TODO (1) : Define what large room means and what is the recommanded maximum number of +participants in a E2EE room. + **UI considerations :** * Should make clear that this room is owned by a specific user.