fix up some things

pull/2010/head
Sorunome 5 years ago
parent 70d3fd809e
commit d750115fdc
No known key found for this signature in database
GPG Key ID: 63E31F7B5993A9C4

@ -1,25 +1,48 @@
# MSC 2010: Proposal to add client-side spoilers
Sometimes you are talking about e.g. a new movie and want to discuss the plot without spoiling others. Or you are talking in e.g. some mental health community where, due to triggers, some content shouldn't be immediately visible to everybody. For this the content is hidden and then revealed once interacted somehow (e.g. a click / hover).
Sometimes, while you want to put text into a spoiler to not have people accidentally read things that they don't want to see.
For example, when discussing a new movie or a TV series, not everyone might have watched it yet. In such cases it would make sense to add a spoiler so that only those who have seen the movie or don't mind spoilers read the content.
Another example would be e.g. in mental health communities where certain people have certain triggers. People could put talking about abuse or thelike into a spoiler, to not accidentally trigger anyone just reading along the conversation.
Furthermore this is helpful for bridging to other networks that already have a spoiler feature.
## Proposal
This proposal adds a new attribute, `data-mx-spoiler`, to the `<span>` tag. If the attribute is present the contents of the span tag should be rendered as a spoiler. Optionally, you can specify a reason for the spoiler by setting the attribute string.
To render the spoiler the content is hidden and then revealed once interacted somehow (e.g. a click / hover).
For example:
`Hello there, the movie was <span data-mx-spoiler>awesome</span>` for a spoiler without reason and `Hey <span data-mx-spoiler="movie">the movie was awesome</span>` for a spoiler with the reason "movie".
## Proposal
This proposal is about adding a new attribute to the `formatted_body` of messages with type `m.room.message` and msgtype `m.text`.
It adds a new attribute, `data-mx-spoiler`, to the `<span>` tag. If the attribute is present the contents of the span tag should be rendered as a spoiler. Optionally, you can specify a reason for the spoiler by setting the attribute string.
The plain-text fallback could be rendered as `(Spoiler: <content>)` and `(Spoiler for <reason>: <content>)` respectively.
For example:
`Hi <span data-mx-spoiler>there</span>` would have as fallback `Hi (Spoiler: there)`
`Hi <span data-mx-spoiler="greeting">there</span>` would have as fallback `Hi (Spoiler for greeting: there)`
### Example
Without reason:
```
{
"msgtype": "m.text",
"format": "org.matrix.custom.html",
"body": "Hello there, the movie was (Spoiler: awesome)",
"formatted_body": "Hello there, the movie was <span data-mx-spoiler>awesome</span>"
}
```
With reason:
```
{
"msgtype": "m.text",
"format": "org.matrix.custom.html",
"body": "Hey (Spoiler for movie: the movie was awesome)",
"formatted_body": "Hey <span data-mx-spoiler="movie">the movie was awesome</span>"
}
```
## Tradeoffs
Instead of making this an attribute, an entirely new tag could be introduced (e.g. `<mx-spoiler>`), however that wouldn't be HTML-compliant.
Instead of limiting the proposed `data-mx-spoiler` attribute only to the `<span>`-tag it could be added to all tags, however it might make implementations for clients more complicated.
Clients would have to come up with a way how to input spoilers. This could be done, for example, by adding a custom markdown tag (like discord does), so that you do `Text ||spoiler||`, however that doesn't take a spoiler reason into account.
## Potential issues
Depending on context it might make sense to put other events, such as `m.image`, into spoilers, too. This MSC doesn't address that at all. Using `<span data-mx-spoiler><img src="mxc://server/media"></span>` seems rather sub-optimal for that.
This MSC doesn't take HTML block elements into account.
## Security considerations
The spoiler reason needs to be properly escaped when rendered.

Loading…
Cancel
Save