From d491acc9e502b960480fa23018fda4093ce9d88b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: David Baker Date: Tue, 8 Jul 2025 12:40:04 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] Clarify that browsers are awful --- proposals/4230-animated-image-flag.md | 3 ++- 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/proposals/4230-animated-image-flag.md b/proposals/4230-animated-image-flag.md index 4928ce5ef..9e7fe4620 100644 --- a/proposals/4230-animated-image-flag.md +++ b/proposals/4230-animated-image-flag.md @@ -52,7 +52,8 @@ allowing for 'jump scares' or similar. Clients may wish to prevent images from b flag is set to false. As above, supporting animated images becomes harder for sending clients because they must work out if -an image is animated in order to set the flag. +an image is animated in order to set the flag. We must accept that some clients, particularly browser-based +clients, may get this wrong. ## Alternatives